J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(05): 348-354
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546421
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Impact of Specialty Training on the Association between Flap Size and Incidence of Complications following Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction for Cancer

Anaeze C. Offodile II
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
,
Andrew S. Aherrera
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
,
Julia Wenger
2   Department of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Thomas Tsai
3   Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Dennis P. Orgill
3   Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Lifei Guo
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 October 2014

20 December 2014

Publication Date:
13 March 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background The scope of otolaryngology and plastic surgery overlap within head and neck reconstruction is increasing; yet comparative outcome studies between these two subspecialties are limited.

Methods A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction of a postablative head and neck defect at a quaternary academic medical center between January 2000 and October 2011. Postoperative outcomes were reviewed by subspecialty and Mann–Whitney analysis was used to investigate any flap size differences between cohorts with and without complications.

Results A consecutive series of 129 (66.8%) otolaryngology cases and 64 (33.2%) plastic surgery cases comprised the entire study sample. Plastic surgery flaps were significantly larger than otolaryngology flaps (9.7 vs. 8.5 cm, p = 0.004). Flap complication rates (31.8 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.429) and flap failure rates (5.4 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.429) were comparable between subspecialties. However, a significant difference in flap size was evident between the cohorts with and without flap complications following microvascular reconstruction by otolaryngology (9.18 vs. 8.15 cm, p = 0.042). This difference was not detected following reconstruction by plastic surgery (9.34 vs. 9.04 cm, p = 0.225). For the overall sample, there was a correlation between increasing flap size and higher tumor stages (significant at T4, p = 0.003) as well as advanced T-stage and medical complications (p = 0.004).

Conclusion Plastic surgeons should maintain an active role in the reconstruction of complex, microvascular head and neck cases such as those that require larger flaps and/or of advanced T-stages.

 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64 (1) 9-29
  • 2 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR , et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (3) 711-721
  • 3 Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP , et al. Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (3) 459-463
  • 4 Singh B, Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Shaha AR, Pfister DG, Shah JP. Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (2) 403-411
  • 5 Finical SJ, Doubek WG, Yugueros P, Johnson CH. The fate of free flaps used to reconstruct defects in recurrent head and neck cancers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (6) 1363-1366 , discussion 1367–1368
  • 6 Urken ML, Weinberg H, Buchbinder D , et al. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Report of 200 cases and review of complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120 (6) 633-640
  • 7 Pattani KM, Byrne P, Boahene K, Richmon J. What makes a good flap go bad? A critical analysis of the literature of intraoperative factors related to free flap failure. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (4) 717-723
  • 8 Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Suárez C, Wei WI, Bradley PJ, Ferlito A. Complications of free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. Oral Oncol 2004; 40 (10) 979-984
  • 9 Chen YW, Chen CY, Chiang SC, Lui MT, Kao SY, Yang MH. Predictors and impact of microsurgical complications in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2012; 103 (9) 1672-1678
  • 10 Kruse AL, Luebbers HT, Grätz KW, Obwegeser JA. Factors influencing survival of free-flap in reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck: a literature review. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (3) 242-248
  • 11 Selber JC, Xue A, Liu J , et al. Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction outcomes following 349 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (9) 641-654
  • 12 Spyropoulou GA, Jeng SF, Hsieh CH, Tsimponis A, Shih HS. Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer in elderly patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (2) 91-96
  • 13 Bhama PK, Patel SA, Khan U, Bhrany AD, Futran ND. Head and neck free flap reconstruction in patients older than 80 years. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (8) 523-530
  • 14 Butala PCM, Wilk A, Anolik R, Hollenbeck ST. Comparison of early outcomes between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists performing head and neck free flap reconstruction: based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (Suppl): 989-990
  • 15 Moon SJ, Hong JP, Kang SR, Suh HS. Survey of reconstructive microsurgery training in Korea. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (1) 54-58
  • 16 Frederick JW, Sweeny L, Carroll WR, Peters GE, Rosenthal EL. Outcomes in head and neck reconstruction by surgical site and donor site. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (7) 1612-1617
  • 17 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H , et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (6) 363-368 , discussion 369
  • 18 Pohlenz P, Klatt J, Schön G, Blessmann M, Li L, Schmelzle R. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery: complications and outcome of 1000 flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (6) 739-743
  • 19 Eckardt A, Meyer A, Laas U, Hausamen JE. Reconstruction of defects in the head and neck with free flaps: 20 years experience. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45 (1) 11-15
  • 20 Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L , et al. Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 125 (1) 10-17
  • 21 le Nobel GJ, Higgins KM, Enepekides DJ. Predictors of complications of free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: analysis of 304 free flap reconstruction procedures. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (5) 1014-1019
  • 22 Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Kroll SS, Marchi M, Goepfert H. A single center's experience with 308 free flaps for repair of head and neck cancer defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (3) 472-478 , discussion 479–480
  • 23 Simpson KH, Murphy PG, Hopkins PM, Batchelor AG. Prediction of outcomes in 150 patients having microvascular free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49 (5) 267-273
  • 24 Blackwell KE, Brown MT, Gonzalez D. Overcoming the learning curve in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (12) 1332-1335
  • 25 Khouri RK. Free flap surgery. The second decade. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (4) 757-761
  • 26 Khouri RK. Avoiding free flap failure. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (4) 773-781
  • 27 Spiegel JH, Polat JK. Microvascular flap reconstruction by otolaryngologists: prevalence, postoperative care, and monitoring techniques. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (3) 485-490