J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(02): 145-153
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394101
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Survival of Abdominal Perforator Flaps: An Experimental Study in Rats with Slowly Induced Diabetes Mellitus

Authors

  • Bogdan Ionut Baldea

    1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Clinical Emergency County Hospital Brasov, Brasov, Romania
  • Septimiu Toader

    2   Center of Experimental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu” Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania
  • Pavel Orbai PhD

    3   Department of Clinical Endocrinology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu” Cluj Napoca, Romania
  • Simona Barsan

    4   Department of Plastic Surgery, Children's Emergency Hospital Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania
  • Radu Olariu

    5   University Hospital “Inselspital” and University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland
  • Dan Ovidiu Grigorescu

    1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Clinical Emergency County Hospital Brasov, Brasov, Romania
  • Marius Penciu

    6   Department of Pathology, Clinical Emergency County Hospital Brasov, Brasov, Romania
  • Andras Laszlo Nagy

    7   Department of Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Alexandru Valentin Georgescu

    8   Department of Plastic Surgery, Clinical Recovery Hospital Cluj Napoca, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Cluj, Romania
Further Information

Publication History

17 February 2014

06 August 2014

Publication Date:
31 October 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Lower limb ulcers are a major source of morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Surgical coverage of these wounds is fraught with a high complication rate. Although clinically perforator flaps lead to good results in diabetic patients, there is little experimental data to support this finding.

Methods A total of 60 Wistar rats were randomly assigned either to the diabetic (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin injection at 50 mg/kg body weight and was confirmed by blood glucose levels > 180 mg/dL preoperatively. In all rats, a cranial epigastric artery perforator flap was raised. At postoperative day 7, all flaps were raised, photographed by digital planimetry, and analyzed histologically.

Results Mean glycemic levels preoperatively were 207.8 ± 16 in the diabetic group and 82.8 ± 5.1 in the control group (p < 0.05). Ninety percent of the flaps survived completely in the control group, compared with 66.7% in the diabetic group (p < 0.05). The mean flap survival area was lower in the diabetic group (83.3 ± 16.5%) than in the control group (96 ± 4%). There were significantly more perioperative complications in the diabetic group (46.7%) than in the control group (16.7%), but these did not affect flap survival. Superficial ulceration appeared only in the diabetic group as a complication.

Conclusion Perforator flaps can be successfully used for coverage of cutaneous defects in a rat diabetic model. These flaps show higher complication rates in diabetic versus nondiabetic animals; however, this complication rate has little influence on flap survival.