Aktuelle Standards und Perspektiven in der koloskopischen Adenomdetektion

M. Anders; T. Erichsen

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1385809

Endoskopie heute, Table of Contents

Endoskopie heute 2014; 27(04): 205-210
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385809

Originalarbeit

Aktuelle Standards und Perspektiven in der koloskopischen Adenomdetektion

Standards and Perspectives in Endoscopic Detection of Colorectal Adenomas

M. Anders

,

T. Erichsen

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Durch endoskopische Entfernung von Adenomen kann deren Progress zu kolorektalen Karzinomen vermieden und die Zahl der Todesfälle aufgrund von kolorektalen Karzinomen reduziert werden. Das Übersehen von Adenomen bedroht diese Effekte und kann im Auftreten von Intervallkarzinomen resultieren. Somit bedarf es der weiteren Optimierung der koloskopischen Vorsorge. Sowohl untersucherbezogene Aspekte als auch neue technische Entwicklungen werden nachfolgend diskutiert.

Abstract

Endoscopic removal of adenomas may prevent development of colon cancer and reduce colon cancer related death. Precursor lesions missed during endoscopy however, may hamper this effect and account for interval cancers. Therefore, measures are needed to further improve the quality of colonoscopic surveillance. Both, factors related to the endoscopist as well as new technical developments are discussed.

Schlüsselwörter

kolorektales Karzinom - Adenome - endoskopische Detektion

Key words

colon cancer - adenoma - endoscopic detection

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108
2 Cho KR, Vogelstein B. Genetic alterations in the adenoma – carcinoma sequence. Cancer 1992; 70: 1727-1731
3 Müller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 904-910
4 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
5 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
6 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
7 Corley DA, Levin TR, Doubeni CA. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2541
8 van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350
9 Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-290
10 Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008; 299: 1027-1035
11 Kim MJ, Lee EJ, Suh JP et al. Traditional serrated adenoma of the colorectum: clinicopathologic implications and endoscopic findings of the precursor lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 2013; 140: 898-911
12 Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885
13 Harris JK, Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V et al. Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: An EPAGE Study. Digestive and Liver Disease 2007; 39: 678-689
14 Eckert LD, Short MW, Domagalski JE et al. Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1: 89-92
15 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
16 Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. YMGE 2000; 51: 33-36
17 Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. YMGE 2005; 61: 378-384
18 Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 456-460
19 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
20 Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352-359
21 Rex DK, Khashab M. Colonoscopic polypectomy in retroflexion. YMGE 2006; 63: 144-148
22 Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 519-522
23 Hewett DG, Rex DK. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 246-252
24 Chandran S, Parker F, Vaughan R et al. Right-sided adenoma detection with retroflexion versus forward-view colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Published Online First: 29 October 2014;
25 de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 1426-1434
26 Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 75-81
27 Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 41-46
28 Ng SC, Tsoi KKF, Hirai HW et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1165-1173
29 Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 402-408
30 Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy – a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e114267
31 Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A et al. Novel Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Increases the Polyp Detection Rate: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Gastroenterol Published Online First: 11 June 2014,
32 Hasan N, Gross SA, Gralnek IM et al. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 1135-1140
33 Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 480-489
34 Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2000-2005
35 Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2138-2142
36 Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 109-114
37 Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J et al. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 155-159
38 Subramanian V, Mannath J, Hawkey CJ et al. High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 499-505
39 Gralnek IM, Carr-Locke DL, Segol O et al. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 472-479
40 Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 353-360
41 Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 657-666
42 Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 940-951
43 Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 511-518
44 Pohl J, Messer I, Behrens A et al. Water infusion for cecal intubation increases patient tolerance, but does not improve intubation of unsedated colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 1039-1043, e1
45 Radaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A et al. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 701-709
46 Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R et al. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U. S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 103-110
47 Leung FW, Aharonian HS, Leung JW et al. Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U. S. veterans. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 546-550
48 Leung JW, Do LD, Siao-Salera RM et al. Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate – a hypothesis generating observation. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 3-7
49 Ramirez FC, Leung FW. A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 130-135
50 Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 693-700
51 Leung JW, Ransibrahmanakul K, Toomsen L et al. The water method combined with chromoendoscopy enhances adenoma detection. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 53-58
52 Yen AW, Leung JW, Leung FW. A new method for screening and surveillance colonoscopy: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 114-119
53 Brown SR, Baraza W. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 6: CD006439, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006439.pub3
54 Pohl J, Schneider A, Vogell H et al. Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 2011; 60: 485-490
55 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. YGAST 2007; 132: 874-882
56 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M et al. Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. YGAST 2003; 124: 880-888
57 Biancone L, Michetti P, Travis S et al. European evidence-based Consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: Special situations. J Crohns Colitis 2008; 2: 63-92
58 Lecomte T, Cellier C, Meatchi T et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. YJCGH 2005; 3: 897-902
59 Stoffel EM, Turgeon DK, Stockwell DH et al. Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2008; 1: 470-475
60 East JE, Suzuki N, Stavrinidis M et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut 2008; 57: 65-70
61 Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 410-416, e1-quiz715
62 Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. YGAST 2007; 133: 42-47
63 Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al. Autofluorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1006-1013
64 van den Broek FJC, Fockens P, Van Eeden S et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 288-295
65 Kuiper T, van den Broek FJC, Naber AH et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1887-1894
66 Goetz M, Ziebart A, Foersch S et al. In vivo molecular imaging of colorectal cancer with confocal endomicroscopy by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 435-446
67 Keller R, Winde G, Terpe HJ et al. Fluorescence endoscopy using a fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal carcinoma and adenoma. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 801-807
68 Hsiung PL, Hsiung PL, Hardy J et al. Detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo using a targeted heptapeptide and confocal microendoscopy. Nat Med 2008; 14: 454-458
69 Goetz M, Wang TD. Molecular imaging in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 828-833, e1
70 Alencar H, Funovics MA, Figueiredo J et al. Colonic adenocarcinomas: near-infrared microcatheter imaging of smart probes for early detection – study in mice. Radiology 2007; 244: 232-238