Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377761
Trocar-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal debridement. Non-NOTES salvage therapy for severe necrotizing pancreatitis
Publication History
Publication Date:
14 October 2014 (online)

A 68-year-old patient with severe biliary pancreatitis developed extensive retroperitoneal necroses, with air collections, extending from the pancreatic compartment to the pelvis ([Fig. 1 a, b]). Percutaneous and transgastric drainage (twice each) did not resolve the solid calcified infected material (vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Neisseria subflava, Haemophilus influenzae, Candida albicans), which could not be adequately accessed transluminally [1]. Laparotomy was deemed too risky for this moribund patient (30-kg loss of body weight), who had persistent sepsis 9 weeks after presentation.


A guidewire (Jagwire, 0.035 inch, 460 mm; Boston-Scientific, Ratingen, Germany) was inserted through the drainage access in the left lower quadrant, and a thin endoscope (outer diameter 6.3 mm; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) was percutaneously advanced into the retroperitoneal space under fluoroscopy. A 10-mm laparoscopic trocar (Kii Fios First Entry; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, USA), which was loaded onto the endoscope, was inserted under optical guidance to secure the retroperitoneal access ([Fig. 2]). Debridement was then performed with a standard gastroscope (9.8 mm; Pentax) through the trocar ([Video 1]), with the patient in the supine position under propofol sedation. Debridement was performed from the pelvic space, through the retrosplenic and retrorenal areas and up to the pancreatic area. Craniocaudal trocar movements facilitated the maneuverability of the endoscope. A large bore drainage catheter (Thal-Quick 28 Fr; Cook Medical, Limerick, Ireland) was then placed to secure the access.


Quality:
Clinical, radiological, and serological improvement were observed, and the procedure was repeated 8 days later. Lavage with sterile saline was then continued in an outpatient setting. A third percutaneous endoscopy (without trocar) after 4 months demonstrated vital retroperitoneal tissue and closure of most of the pelvic and retrosplenic access routes ([Fig. 3]). These findings were confirmed by computed tomography ([Fig. 1 c, d]). One year later, the patient was well, although still suffering from pancreatic insufficiency.


In trocar-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal debridement, a stiff trocar stabilizes and guides the endoscope and allows repeated extraction of debris through the abdominal wall, similar to videoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal debridement [2]. At the same time, flexible endoscopic maneuverability and instrumentation is maintained in the retroperitoneal space, similar to transmural procedures, but with more direct access. Such a procedure (with re-interventions “on demand”) may be adequate in an interdisciplinary step-up approach [3] for infected pancreatic necroses.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD
-
References
- 1 Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut 2009; 58: 1260-1266
- 2 Horvath KD, Kao LS, Wherry KL et al. A technique for laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1221-1225
- 3 Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB et al. Minimally invasive ‘step-up approach’ versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC Surg 2006; 6: 6