Priorities, Satisfaction and Treatment Goals in Psychosis Patients: An Online Consumer’s Survey

Abstract

Background:

An insight into preferences, satisfaction and treatment goals of patients is important for reaching treatment alliance and may increase the success of initiated treatment.

Methods:

Participants from the Netherlands, with at least one psychotic episode, were asked to fill in an online questionnaire. Participants ranked their priorities in treatment content, stated whether they were satisfied on these items and ranked a list of treatment goals.

Results:

462 respondents ranked their treatment preferences regarding treatment content (mean age: 40.3 years; mean duration of illness: 13.5 years). Items ranked most important: “prompt assistance, preferably in own environment”, “attention for medication”, “appropriate attitude of the professional caregiver”. More than 50% rated “unsatisfied” or “very unsatisfied” for: “practical help in resocialization”, “aid to acquire autonomy” and “help with physical health”. 345 participants ranked treatment goals (mean age: 40.4 years; mean duration of illness: 13.7 years). Items ranked most important: “reducing apathy and lack of initiative”, “reducing disturbing or unusual experiences”, “reducing confusion and concentration problems”.

Conclusion:

Psychiatric services should pay great attention to early outpatient intervention with supportive counseling and an appropriate attitude of the caregiver with attention for medication use. Improvement is warranted for practical assistance, help in regaining autonomy and help with physical health.

Key words

psychosis - schizophrenia - patient perspectives - treatment preferences - treatment satisfaction

• References

• 1 Fischer EP, Shumway M, Owen RR. Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 724-729
• 2 de Haan L, van Raaij B, van den Berg R et al. Preferences for treatment during a first psychotic episode. Eur Psychiatry 2001; 16: 83-89
• 3 de Haan L, Kramer L, van Raay B et al. Priorities and satisfaction on the help needed and provided in a first episode of psychosis. A survey in five European Family Associations. Eur Psychiatry 2002; 17: 425-433
• 4 Leavey G, King M, Cole E et al. First-onset psychotic illness: patient’s and relatives’ satisfaction with services. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 170: 53-57
• 5 Rosenheck R, Stroup S, Keefe RS et al. Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 529-536
• 6 Korver N, Quee PJ, Boos H et al. Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) Investigators. genetic risk and outcome of psychosis, a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene-environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2012; [Epub ahead of print]
• 7 Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T et al. Measuring patients’ views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis. Psychol Med 2011; 41: 277-289
• 8 Drake RE, Cimpean D, Torrey WC. Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2009; 11: 455-463
• 9 Marshall M, Rathbone J. Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 6 CD004718
• 10 Tunner TP, Salzer MS. Consumer perspectives on quality of care in the treatment of schizophrenia. Adm Policy Ment Health 2006; 33: 674-681
• 11 Mason K, Olmos-Gallo A, Bacon D et al. Exploring the consumer’s and provider’s perspective on service quality in community mental health care. Community Mental Health J 2004; 40: 33-46
• 12 Lester H, Tritter JQ, England E. Satisfaction with primary care: the perspectives of people with schizophrenia. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 508-513
• 13 Chue P. The relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 2006; 20 (6 suppl) 38-56
• 14 Brewin CR, Wing JK, Mangen SP et al. Principles and practice of measuring needs in the long-term mentally ill: the MRC needs for care assessment. Psychol Med 1987; 17: 971-981
• 15 Svensson B, Hansson L. Patient satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric care. The influence of personality traits, diagnosis and perceived coercion. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 90: 379-384
• 16 Hätönen H, Suhonen R, Warro H et al. Patients’ perceptions of patient education on psychiatric inpatient wards: a qualitative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2010; 17: 335-341
• 17 Mizrahi R, Bagby RM, Zipursky RB et al. How antipsychotics work: the patients’ perspective. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005; 29: 859-864
• 18 Van Os J, Altamura AC, Bobes J et al. Evaluation of the two-way communication checklist as a clinical intervention. Results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 79-83
• 19 Whitehead LC. Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: An integrated review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65: 782-791
• 20 Fischbacher C, Chappel D, Edwards R et al. Health surveys via the Internet: quick and dirty or rapid and robust?. J R Soc Med 2000; 93: 356-359
• 21 Core figures. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Statistics Netherlands) 2012 www.cbs.nl
• 22 Van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Aiello M et al. Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e24
• 23 Braithwaite D, Emery J, de Lusignan S et al. Using the internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 545-551
• 24 Klovning A, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1068-1074