J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29(01): 057-062
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326743
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Predictive Value of SIEV Caliber and Superficial Venous Dominance in Free DIEP Flaps

K. W. Sadik
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana/Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
J. Pasko
2   Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
A. Cohen
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana/Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
J. Cacioppo
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Indiana/Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 April 2012

29 May 2012

Publication Date:
23 October 2012 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) is recognized as an important potential venous conduit in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps.[1] [2] [3] [4] Diffuse flap congestion, despite a patent deep inferior epigastric venous anastomosis, occurs in 2% of cases. The SIEV can augment venous outflow and decrease flap congestion. Although a poorly understood phenomenon, the likelihood of its use was thought to be directly proportional to the SIEV size and caliber.[5] [6] Herein we investigate this correlation.

Aim To determine whether the diameter of SIEV in patients undergoing DIEP flaps was predictive of a superficial venous system dominance, necessitating its use in alleviating venous congestion.

Patients/Methods The in situ SIEV diameter of 39 sequential patients undergoing DIEP flaps was measured on computed tomography (CT) angiography preoperatively as well as intraoperatively from 2008 to 2009. Three patients were excluded for aborted DIEP flap attempt. Six flaps subsequently required venous outflow augmentation with the SIEV. This data was examined using Spearman's correlation analysis.

Results No correlation between SIEV diameter (in situ and radiographic) and eventual use was noted. Other factors such as body mass index (BMI), age, and BMI:SIEV size ratio also failed to predict venous congestion and eventual SIEV use. Flap outcomes are reported herein.

Conclusion Our findings suggest that SIEV diameter is not an indicator of superficial epigastric venous dominance and therefore is not predictive of venous congestion nor of its use in increasing venous outflow. This contradicts previously held assumptions that larger caliber SIEVs were indicative of a dominant superficial venous system and more likely to result in their use as an alternate route for venous outflow. Our findings suggest that the SIEV should be prophylactically dissected and harvested in raising every DIEP flap, regardless of its caliber.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rohde C, Keller A. Novel technique for venous augmentation in a free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 528-530
  • 2 Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K , et al. Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1295-1299
  • 3 Blondeel PN ; PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 104-111
  • 4 Wechselberger G, Schoeller T, Bauer T, Ninkovic M, Otto A, Ninkovic M. Venous superdrainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 162-166
  • 5 Cavadas PC. Unusual intraoperative venous complication in a free DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1312-1313
  • 6 Blondeel P, Morris S, Hallock G, Neligan P , eds. History of flap surgery. In: Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006
  • 7 Schaverien MV, Ludman CN, Neil-Dwyer J , et al. Relationship between venous congestion and intraflap venous anatomy in DIEP flaps using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 385-392