physioscience 2013; 9(1): 9-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325587
Fallbericht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Orthesengestütztes Eigentraining im häuslichen Umfeld führt zu motorisch-funktioneller Verbesserung bei einem Patienten nach Schlaganfall

Orthotic-Aided Self-Administered Home Exercise Leads to Improved Motor Hand Function in a Patient after Stroke
T. Jaenecke
,
K.-F. Heise
,
F. C. Hummel
Further Information

Publication History

25 June 2012

22 October 2012

Publication Date:
26 February 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Für mittelgradig bis schwer betroffene Patienten nach Schlaganfall sind die Möglichkeiten der Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen limitiert. Bisherige Evidenz spricht dafür, dass repetitives, aufgabenspezifisches Training zu motorischen Verbesserungen der Hand- und Armfunktion bei chronischen Schlaganfallpatienten führt.

Ziel: Der Fallbericht beschreibt die nachhaltige Verbesserung der motorischen Funktion der oberen Extremität infolge eines orthesengestützten Eigentrainings bei einem 54-jährigen Patienten mit spastischer Hemiparese rechts zu Beginn des Trainings knapp 4 Jahre nach Schlaganfall.

Methode: Die Intervention beinhaltete ein 5-tägiges Intensivtraining à 3 Stunden unter therapeutischer Anleitung, gefolgt von einem täglichen selbstständig durchgeführten Eigentraining im häuslichen Umfeld und begleitet von regelmäßiger Supervision und Evaluation (Fugl-Meyer-Test, Action Research Arm Test, Ashworth-Skala, isometrische Griffkraft, Stroke Impact Skala) über 9 Monate sowie 2-maliger Injektion mit Botulinumtoxin.

Ergebnisse: Der Patient zeigte über die 9 Monate eine deutliche Verbesserung der motorischen Funktion und schätzte die negativen Auswirkungen des Schlaganfalls auf seine Lebensqualität nach dem Eigentraining als prägnanter ein.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Ergebnisse deuten daraufhin, dass ein systematisches, therapeutisch supervidiertes orthesengestütztes Eigentraining die aktive Trainingszeit erhöhen und zu nachhaltigen motorisch-funktionellen Verbesserungen bei Patienten im chronischen Stadium führen kann.

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic interventions are limited for patients with moderate to severe impairment of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Current evidence suggests repetitive, task-oriented training to improve motor hand and arm function in chronic stroke patients.

Objective: This case study describes sustained improvement of upper extremities’ motor function resulting from orthotic-aided self-administered exercise in a 54-year old patient with right-sided spastic hemiparesis at the beginning of the training barely 4 years after stroke.

Method: Treatment included a 3 hours intensive tutorial training followed by daily independent self-administered orthotic-aided home exercise and accompanied by regular supervision and evaluation (Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test, Ashworth Spasticity Scale, Grip and Pinch Force, Stroke Impact Scale) during 6 months as wells as 2 botulinumtoxin injections.

Results: Over the period of 9 months the patient showed distinct improvement of motor function and after the self-administered training reassessed the negative stroke impacts on his quality of life more coherently.

Conclusion: The results point out that a systematic therapeutically-supervised orthotic-aided home exercise programme may increase the active practice period and result in distinct motor function improvement in chronic stroke patients.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Butler A, Blanton S, Rowe V et al. Attempting to improve function and quality of life using the FTM Protocol: case report. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2006; 30: 148-156
  • 2 Carroll D. Hand Function in Hemiplegia. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1965; 18: 493-500
  • 3 Choquette S, Hamel M, Boissy P. Accelerometer-based wireless body area network to estimate intensity of therapy in post-acute rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2008; 5: 20-30
  • 4 Cooke EV, Mares K, Clark A et al. The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2010; 8: 60-72
  • 5 Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy during Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment after Ischemic Stroke?. Stroke 2000; 31: 2984-2988
  • 6 Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM et al. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: Evaluation of Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity to Change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131-2140
  • 7 Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG et al. Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability, and health domains. J Hand Ther 2011; 24: 257-264 ; quiz: 265
  • 8 Farrell JF, Hoffman HB, Snyder JL et al. Orthotic aided training of the paretic upper limb in chronic stroke: results of a phase 1 trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22: 99-103
  • 9 Ferrarello F, Baccini M, Rinaldi LA et al. Efficacy of physiotherapy interventions late after stroke: a meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2011; 82: 136-143
  • 10 French B, Thomas L, Leathley M et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2010; 42: 9-14
  • 11 Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1975; 7: 13-31
  • 12 Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232-240
  • 13 Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL. Responsiveness of two Upper Extremity Function Instruments for Stroke Inpatients Receiving Rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 617-624
  • 14 Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2004; 22: 281-299
  • 15 Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. Journal of Neurology 2002; 72: 473-479
  • 16 Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke – A Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2004; 35: 2529-2539
  • 17 Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 823-830
  • 18 Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ et al. Forced Use of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke Patients. Results From a Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-2375
  • 19 Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ et al. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2001; 33: 110-113
  • 20 Marshall RS, Zarahn E, Alon L et al. Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol 2009; 65: 596-602
  • 21 Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically Important Differences for the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in People with Minimal to Moderate Impairment Due to Chronic Stroke. Phys Ther 2012; 92: 791-798
  • 22 Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A Multicentre Study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2005; 19: 404-411
  • 23 Ploughman M, Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1417-1423
  • 24 Tarkka IM, Pitkänen K, Sivenius J. Paretic hand rehabilitation with constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 501-505
  • 25 Taub E, Uswatte G, Kind DK et al. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 1045-1049
  • 26 Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PC et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 1-8
  • 27 Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA – The Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 296: 2095-2104
  • 28 Woodbury X, Velozo X et al. ((restl. bibl. Angaben?)). 2007;
  • 29 World Health Organisation (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2001 www.who.int/classifications/icf/en