Survival Outcomes of Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome Stage I: A Systematic Review of Literature

Abstract

Objective To review literature about treatment of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) stage I.

Materials A search in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and reference lists was performed. Inclusion criteria were TTTS diagnosed with standard criteria and classified with Quintero staging and survival rates (SR) stratified for stage and first-choice treatment. Outcomes were SR and progression to advanced stages. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

Results Seven articles pooled 262 twin sets treated with amnioreduction (16%), conservative management (22%), and laser therapy (62%). The overall SR was 77% after amnioreduction, 86% in the conservative management group, and 85% in the laser therapy group. Progression rate occurred in 30%, 15%, and 0%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between laser therapy as first- versus second-choice treatment. Because most studies were observational and not comparative, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Conclusion Conservative management of TTTS stage I is a reasonable option until randomized clinical trials are presented.

Keywords

twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) - Quintero staging system - stage I - laser therapy - conservative management

Note

This review was presented by the first author to the First World Conference in Pediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynecology, OMICS group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (December 6 to 8, 2011) as oral presentation.

• References

• 1 Berghella V, Kaufmann M. Natural history of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 480-484
• 2 Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Allen MH, Bornick PW, Johnson PK, Kruger M. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19 (8 Pt 1) 550-555
• 3 Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Laser therapy and serial amnioreduction as treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a metaanalysis and review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 147-152
• 4 Wagner MM, Lopriore E, Klumper FJ, Oepkes D, Vandenbussche FP, Middeldorp JM. Short- and long-term outcome in stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery compared with conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 286 , e1–e6
• 5 O'Donoghue K, Cartwright E, Galea P, Fisk NM. Stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome: rates of progression and regression in relation to outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 958-964
• 6 Bebbington MW, Tiblad E, Huesler-Charles M, Wilson RD, Mann SE, Johnson MP. Outcomes in a cohort of patients with stage I twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 48-51
• 7 Chmait RH, Kontopoulos EV, Korst LM, Llanes A, Petisco I, Quintero RA. Stage-based outcomes of 682 consecutive cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery: the USFetus experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 393 , e1–e6
• 8 Fichera A, Lanna M, Fratelli N, Rustico M, Frusca T. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome presenting at early stages: is there still a possible role for amnioreduction?. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 144-148
• 9 Huber A, Diehl W, Bregenzer T, Hackelöer BJ, Hecher K. Stage-related outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic laser coagulation. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 333-337
• 10 Meriki N, Smoleniec J, Challis D, Welsh AW. Immediate outcome of twin-twin transfusion syndrome following selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels at the NSW Fetal Therapy Centre. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 112-119
• 11 Yang X, Leung TY, Ngan Kee WD, Chen M, Chan LW, Lau TK. Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation in the management of twin-twin transfusion syndrome: local experience from Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16: 275-281
• 12 Jain V, Fisk NM. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 181-202
• 13 Rossi AC, D'Addario V. The efficacy of Quintero staging system to assess severity of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 537-544