Hebammengeleitete Schwangerenvorsorge im Vergleich zu anderen Betreuungsmodellen

Weltweit sind verschiedene Berufsgruppen an der Schwangerenvorsorge beteiligt. Meist sind dies Gynäkologen, Allgemeinmediziner und/oder Hebammen. Welche Unterschiede gibt es zwischen den einzelnen Modellen bei den Outcomes in der Betreuung von low-risk Schwangeren?

• Literatur

• 1 Bernloehr A, Smith P, Vydelingum V. Antenatal care in the European Union: A survey on guidelines in all 25 member states of the Community. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2005; 122(1): 22-32
• 2 Blanchette H. Comparison of obstetric outcome of a primary-care access clinic staffed by certified nurse-midwives and a private practice group of obstetricians in the same community. American Journal of Obstetrics and gynecology 1995; 172(6): 1864-1871
• 3 Di Mario S et al. What is the effectiveness of antenatal care?. [Supplement] Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (Health Evidence Network report) 2005 http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/74660/E87997.pdf
• 4 Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio GG. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy [elektronische Version]. 2010 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (10)
• 5 Europäische Union. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the Recognition of Professional Qualifications. 2005 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:255:0022:0142:en:PDF
• 6 Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women [elektronische Version]. 2009 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3)
• 7 HebG (Bundesgesetz über den Hebammenberuf). 1994 (Österreichisches Bundesrecht) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10010804&ShowPrintPreview=True
• 8 Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. Hebammen-Gesamtvertrag 2010. https://www.avsv.at/avi/dokument/pdf_dokumentanzeige_frameset.xhtml?dokid=2010%3D305&dokStat=0&csrId=2718&tlId=1295456194187
• 9 KBGG (Kinderbetreuungsgeldgesetz) 2001. (Österreichisches Bundesrecht) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung/Bundesnormen/20001474/KBGG%2c%20Fassung%20vom%2013.12.2011.pdf
• 10 MuKiPassV (Mutter-Kind-Pass-Verordnung) 2002. (Österreichischer Bundesminister für soziale Sicherheit und Generationen) http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung/Bundesnormen/20001694/MuKiPassV%2c%20Fassung%20vom%2013.12.2011.pdf
• 11 NICE. Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. 2008 http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11947/40145/40145.pdf
• 12 O’Brien B, Harvey S, Sommerfeldt S, Beischel S, Newburn-Cook C, Schopflocher D. Comparison of costs and associated outcomes between women choosing newly integrated autonomous midwifery care and matched controls: a pilot study. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada 2010; 32(7): 650-656
• 13 O’Brien B, Chalmers B, Fell D, Heaman M, Darling EK, Herbert P. The Experience of Pregnancy and Birth with Midwives: Results from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Birth 2011; 38(3): 207-215
• 14 Oakley D, Murtland T, Mayes F, Hayashi R, Petersen BA, Rorie C, Andersen F. Processes of care: Comparisons of certified Nurse-Midwives and Obstetricians. Journal of Nurse Midwifery 1995; 40(5): 399-409
• 15 RCOG. Standards for Maternity Care-Report of a Working Party. 2008 http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/engagement/clinical/ncls/midwives/rcogstandards.pdf
• 16 Turnbull D, Baghurst P, Collins C, Cornwell C, Nixon A, Donnelan-Fernandez R, Antoniou G. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. . Part I: Clinical effectiveness Women and Birth 2009; 22(1): 3-9