Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229(09): 910-916
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314984
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Infektionen nach Linsenchirurgie: Implikationen für die refraktive Chirurgie

Infections after Intraocular Lens Surgery: Implications for Refractive Surgery
S. Taneri
1   Zentrum für Refraktive Chirurgie, Augenabteilung am St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster
,
A. Heiligenhaus
1   Zentrum für Refraktive Chirurgie, Augenabteilung am St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 05 January 2012

akzeptiert 14 May 2012

Publication Date:
12 September 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Neben der klassischen Indikationsstellung der Kataraktoperation bei Vorliegen einer visusmindernden Trübung in der kristallinen Linse gewinnt die Extraktion der noch nicht getrübten Linse auch als primär refraktiver Eingriff zunehmend an Bedeutung. Die vorliegende Literaturübersicht soll unter Berücksichtigung der gültigen Empfehlungen verschiedener Fachgesellschaften und neuerer Studien helfen, die Inzidenz einer postoperativen Endophthalmitis einzuschätzen und evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zur Prophylaxe, Diagnose und Therapie geben.

Die nach Kataraktextraktion berichtete Inzidenz beträgt in den meisten umfangreichen Studien zwischen 0,04 % und 0,3 %. Die beiderseitige Kataraktoperation am selben Tag findet international zunehmend Verbreitung. Ob dabei das Endophthalmitisrisiko verändert ist, bleibt derzeit schwierig abzuschätzen. Von einer postoperativen Endophthalmitis ist das Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS) abzugrenzen. Dabei handelt es sich um eine akut auftretende sterile Entzündung nach Kataraktoperation. Reste von Reinigungs- und Sterilisationsmitteln am chirurgischen Instrumentarium werden als Hauptauslöser vermutet. Zudem gilt die unsachgemäße Präparation von intrakameralen Spüllösungen und Antibiotika als ein bedeutsamer Grund. Ein TASS wurde auch nach Implantation einer irisgestützten Vorderkammerlinse in ein phakes Auge berichtet. Das in der ESCRS-Studie zur Endophthalmitisprophylaxe verwendete und für die kataraktchirurgische Routine anempfohlene Cefuroxim ist in Deutschland nicht als fertige Lösung für die intraoperative Applikation kommerziell erhältlich. Zur Prophylaxe der postoperativen Endophthalmitis werden in verschiedenen Ländern unterschiedliche Maßnahmen praktiziert, deren Wert nicht exakt quantifizierbar ist. Die Povidon-Iod-Antisepsis gilt immer noch als am besten abgesicherte Komponente zur Endophthalmitisprophylaxe. Zur Therapie der akuten postoperativen Endophthalmitis wird ergänzend zur intravitrealen Instillation von Antibiotika deren systemische Gabe empfohlen. Wenige Kasuistiken wurden publiziert, in denen eine Infektion nach Implantation von refraktiven Linsen in ein phakes Auge beschrieben wurde, jedoch konnten wir keine aussagekräftige Angabe zur Inzidenz der Endophthalmitis nach Implantation von refraktiven Intraokularlinsen finden. Aufgrund der Tatsache, dass die Introkularlinse nicht in den Kapselsack implantiert wird, sondern vor die Augenlinse bzw. in die Vorderkammer, und der insgesamt vermutlich besseren antimikrobiellen Abwehrlage in dieser überwiegend jüngeren Population im Vergleich zu Kataraktpatienten kann vermutet werden, dass die Infektionsrate niedriger ist als nach der Kataraktoperation. Dennoch erscheint ein prospektives Register zur Dokumentation möglichst aller Endophthalmitispatienten wünschenswert.

Abstract

Apart from the classical indication of removing an opaque lens that is compromising vision, extraction of the crystalline lens is gaining increasing importance as a refractive procedure. This literature review which considers the present guidelines of various ophthalmological societies and recently published studies is intended to give an estimate of the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis and evidence-based recommendations for its prophylaxis, diagnosis, and therapy. The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract extraction is reported to be 0.04 % to 0.3 % in most sizeable studies. Immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery is internationally gaining popularity. It remains difficult to estimate whether or not the risk of endophthalmitis is affected with this approach. A toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) needs to be differentiated from postoperative endophthalmitis. TASS is an acute sterile inflammation after cataract surgery. Remnants of detergents and antiseptics on the surgical instruments are supposed to be main triggers. Additionally, the inappropriate preparation of solutions and antibiotics for intracameral use is considered to be a major cause. A case of TASS was also reported after implantation of an iris-fixated anterior chamber lens in a phakic eye. The cefuroxime solution that was prophylactically used in the ESCRS study and that is recommended for routine cataract surgery is not commercially available in Germany as a ready preparation for intraoperative application. Different measures are undertaken in different countries to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis, whose values are not exactly quantifiable. Antisepsis with povidone-iodine is still considered to be the component with the best evidence. For management of acute postoperative endophthalmitis, the systemic application of antibiotics is recommended in addition to their intravitreal injection. Few case reports have been published describing an infection after the implantation of refractive intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a phakic eye. However, we could not find meaningful information regarding the incidence of endophthalmitis after implantation of refractive IOLs. Based on the fact that these IOLs are not implanted into the capsular bag but in front of the crystalline lens or into the anterior chamber, and the presumably better anti-microbial immunity of this younger population compared to cataract patients, one may assume that the infection rate is lower than after cataract surgery. Nevertheless, a prospective register to document all endophthalmitis cases is desirable.

 
  • Referenzen

  • 1 Behrens-Baumann W, Augustin A, Dick B et al. Leitlinie zur Prophylaxe und Therapie von Endophthalmitiden. Deutschsprachigen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation und refraktive Chirurgie (DGII); 2005: 1-28
  • 2 Haryy P, Scal D, Cottinby G et al. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 978-988
  • 3 Barry P, Behrens-Baumann W, Pleyer U et al. ESCRS Guidelines on prevention, investigation and management of post-operative endophthalmitis. The European Society for Cataract & Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS); 2007: 1-35
  • 4 Mamalis N. Toxic anterior segment syndrome update. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1067-1068
  • 5 Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1479-1496
  • 6 Miller JJ et al. Acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2000–2004): incidence, clinical settings, and visual acuity outcomes after treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 983-987
  • 7 Lundstrom M et al. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a nationwide prospective study evaluating incidence in relation to incision type and location. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 866-870
  • 8 Sheng Y et al. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in China, 1995–2009. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1715-1722
  • 9 Taban M et al. Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 613-620
  • 10 Jensen MK et al. Third- and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: retrospective comparison of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed over 10 years. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1460-1467
  • 11 Melo GB et al. Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002–2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2010; 73: 505-507
  • 12 Arshinoff SA, Bastianelli PA. Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 2105-2114
  • 13 Tan CS, Wong HK, Yang FP. Epidemiology of postoperative endophthalmitis in an Asian population: 11-year incidence and effect of intracameral antibiotic agents. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 425-430
  • 14 Jambulingam M et al. A study on the incidence, microbiological analysis and investigations on the source of infection of postoperative infectious endophthalmitis in a tertiary care ophthalmic hospital: an 8-year study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010; 58: 297-302
  • 15 Dickey JB, Thompson KD, Jay WM. Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112: 278-282
  • 16 Taylor AW, Kaplan HJ. Ocular immune privilege in the year 2010: ocular immune privilege and uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010; 18: 488-492
  • 17 Zhou R, Caspi RR. Ocular immune privilege. F1000 Biol Rep 2010; 2: 3
  • 18 Kamalarajah S et al. Presumed infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery in the UK: a case-control study of risk factors. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21: 580-586
  • 19 Hatch WV et al. Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a population-based study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 425-430
  • 20 Hori Y et al. Susceptibility comparisons of normal preoperative conjunctival bacteria to fluoroquinolones. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 475-479
  • 21 Packer M et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1699-1714
  • 22 Yiu G et al. Prophylaxis against postoperative endophthalmitis in cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011; 51: 67-83
  • 23 Faoagali J et al. Comparison of the immediate, residual, and cumulative antibacterial effects of Novaderm R,* Novascrub R,* Betadine Surgical Scrub, Hibiclens, and liquid soap. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23: 337-343
  • 24 Yagci R et al. Penetration of second-, third-, and fourth-generation topical fluoroquinolone into aqueous and vitreous humour in a rabbit endophthalmitis model. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21: 990-994
  • 25 McCulley JP et al. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolone penetration into the aqueous humor in humans. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 955-959
  • 26 Shirodkar AR et al. The comparison of clinical outcomes of endophthalmitis from fluoroquinolone-resistant and susceptible bacteria. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 211-214
  • 27 Raizman MB. Determining the role for antibiotics in the prevention of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 501-502
  • 28 Mistlberger A et al. Anterior chamber contamination during cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 1064-1069
  • 29 Miller KM, Glasgow BJ. Bacterial endophthalmitis following sutureless cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 377-379
  • 30 Ang GS, Barras CW. Prophylaxis against infection in cataract surgery: a survey of routine practice. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006; 16: 394-400
  • 31 Ferguson AW et al. Comparison of 5 % povidone-iodine solution against 1 % povidone-iodine solution in preoperative cataract surgery antisepsis: a prospective randomised double blind study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 163-167
  • 32 Hansmann F et al. [Lavasept as an alternative to PVP-iodine as a preoperative antiseptic in ophthalmic surgery. Randomized, controlled, prospective double-blind trial]. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 1043-1046 1048–1050
  • 33 Leong JK et al. Bacterial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 826-833
  • 34 Ciulla TA, Starr MB, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 13-24
  • 35 Wallin T et al. Cohort study of 27 cases of endophthalmitis at a single institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 735-741
  • 36 Nagaki Y et al. Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery. effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 20-26
  • 37 Shirodkar AR et al. Delayed- versus acute-onset endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 153: 391-398.e2
  • 38 Becker MD, Mackensen F. [Treatment of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. New aspects in an emergency situation]. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 947-951
  • 39 Behrens-Baumann W. [Current therapy for postoperative endophthalmitis]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2008; 225: 919-923
  • 40 Gonzalez-Ruiz A et al. Clinical experience with daptomycin in Europe: the first 2.5 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 912-919
  • 41 Bazan JA, Martin SI, Kaye KM. Newer beta-lactam antibiotics: doripenem, ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and cefepime. Med Clin North Am 2011; 95: 743-760 , viii
  • 42 Haas W et al. Integrated analysis of three bacterial conjunctivitis trials of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 0.6 %: etiology of bacterial conjunctivitis and antibacterial susceptibility profile. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5: 1369-1379
  • 43 Das T et al. Intravitreal dexamethasone in exogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: results of a prospective randomised study. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 1050-1055
  • 44 Oum BS et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa after phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation to correct high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: e209-e210
  • 45 Jalili M et al. Aspergillus endophthalmitis in one eye subsequent to bilateral anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 363-365
  • 46 Davis MJ et al. Culture-positive endophthalmitis after implantation of intraocular Collamer lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1826-1828
  • 47 Allan BD, Argeles-Sabate I, Mamalis N. Endophthalmitis rates after implantation of the intraocular Collamer lens: survey of users between 1998 and 2006. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 766-769