Imaging Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

Inge C.M. Mos; Frederikus A. Klok; Lucia J.M. Kroft; Albert de Roos; Menno V. Huisman

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1311792

Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 33(02): 138-143
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311792

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Imaging Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

Inge C.M. Mos

¹Department of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center), Leiden, The Netherlands.

,

Frederikus A. Klok

¹Department of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center), Leiden, The Netherlands.

,

Lucia J.M. Kroft

²Department of Radiology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

,

Albert de Roos

²Department of Radiology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

,

Menno V. Huisman

¹Department of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center), Leiden, The Netherlands.

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Imaging modalities play an essential role in diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). Clinical outcome studies demonstrated that PE can be safely ruled out in patients with unlikely clinical probability in combination with a normal D-dimer test result; in all other patients additional imaging is needed. The aim is to accurately confirm or rule out the diagnosis of PE, after which, if indicated, anticoagulant treatment can be initiated. Various diagnostic tests are available, and this article reviews the different imaging techniques in patients with suspected PE. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the imaging test of choice because of its high sensitivity and specificity. Compression ultrasonography and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy are reserved for patients with concomitant suspicion of deep vein thrombosis or contraindication for CTPA. Furthermore the diagnostic process in patients with clinically suspected recurrent PE, PE during pregnancy, and PE in the elderly and in patients with malignancy are discussed.

Keywords

pulmonary embolism - venous thromboembolism - imaging - CT angiogram - ventilation/perfusion scan - compression ultrasonography - D-dimer

Full Text

References

References
1 Bounameaux H, Perrier A, Righini M. Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: an update. Vasc Med 2010; 15 (5) 399-406
2 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83 (5) 657-660
3 Wood KE. Major pulmonary embolism: review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Chest 2002; 121 (3) 877-905
4 Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR , et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2007; 245 (2) 315-329
5 Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S , et al; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008; 29 (18) 2276-2315
6 Huisman MV, Klok FA. Diagnostic management of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (Suppl. 01) 312-317
7 van Beek EJ, Brouwerst EM, Song B, Stein PD, Oudkerk M. Clinical validity of a normal pulmonary angiogram in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism—a critical review. Clin Radiol 2001; 56 (10) 838-842
8 van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV , et al; Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295 (2) 172-179
9 Mos IC, Klok FA, Kroft LJ, DE Roos A, Dekkers OM, Huisman MV. Safety of ruling out acute pulmonary embolism by normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with an indication for computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (9) 1491-1498
10 Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA , et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 298 (23) 2743-2753
11 Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS , et al. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (8) 1716-1722
12 Le Gal G, Righini M, Parent F, van Strijen M, Couturaud F. Diagnosis and management of subsegmental pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (4) 724-731
13 Donato AA, Khoche S, Santora J, Wagner B. Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography. Thromb Res 2010; 126 (4) e266-e270
14 Mortelé KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (1) 31-34
15 Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (1) 50-54
16 Kooiman J, Klok FA, Mos IC , et al. Incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy following CT-angiography for clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (2) 409-411
17 Mamlouk MD, vanSonnenberg E, Gosalia R , et al. Pulmonary embolism at CT angiography: implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology 2010; 256 (2) 625-632
18 Kruip MJ, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, Prins MH, Büller HR. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138 (12) 941-951
19 The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263 (20) 2753-2759
20 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ , et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98 (6) 891-899
21 de Groot MR, Turkstra F, van Marwijk Kooy M, Oostdijk AH, van Beek EJ, Büller HR. Value of chest X-ray combined with perfusion scan versus ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83 (3) 412-415
22 Sostman HD, Miniati M, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Stein PD, Pistolesi M. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med 2008; 49 (11) 1741-1748
23 Miniati M, Sostman HD, Gottschalk A, Monti S, Pistolesi M. Perfusion lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a reappraisal and review of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis methods. Semin Nucl Med 2008; 38 (6) 450-461
24 Douma RA, Kamphuisen PW, Rijnders AJ, Ten Wolde M, Büller HR. An alternative diagnostic strategy in young women with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (4) 725-727
25 Douma RA, Kamphuisen PW, Rijnders AJ, Ten Wolde M, Büller HR. An alternative diagnostic strategy in young women with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (4) 725-727
26 Kuiper JW, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NA, Teeuwisse W, Pattynama PM. Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (7) 1496-1500
27 Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D , et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 2004; 116 (5) 291-299
28 Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D , et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2008; 371 (9621) 1343-1352
29 Le Gal G, Righini M, Sanchez O , et al. A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95 (6) 963-966
30 Turkstra F, Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, Brandjes DP, ten Cate JW, Büller HR. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126 (10) 775-781
31 Mac Gillavry MR, Sanson BJ, Büller HR, Brandjes DP. ; ANTELOPE-Study Group. Compression ultrasonography of the leg veins in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is a more extensive assessment of compressibility useful?. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84 (6) 973-976
32 Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P , et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359 (9318) 1643-1647
33 Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 1997; 336 (20) 1422-1427
34 Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM , et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210 (2) 353-359
35 Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE , et al; PIOPED III (Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis III) Investigators. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010; 152 (7) 434-443 , W142-3
36 Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for acute pulmonary embolism: results of the “IRM-EP” study. J Thromb Haemost 2012; Feb 9. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04652.x. [Epub ahead of print]
37 Pontana F, Faivre JB, Remy-Jardin M , et al. Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol 2008; 15 (12) 1494-1504
38 Chae EJ, Seo JB, Jang YM , et al. Dual-energy CT for assessment of the severity of acute pulmonary embolism: pulmonary perfusion defect score compared with CT angiographic obstruction score and right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (3) 604-610
39 Frauenfelder T, Appenzeller P, Karlo C , et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (4) 789-799
40 Stein PD, Freeman LM, Sostman HD , et al. SPECT in acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med 2009; 50 (12) 1999-2007
41 Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P , et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2009; 136 (6) 1546-1553
42 Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV , et al. Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun 2010; 31 (1) 82-86
43 Nijkeuter M, Hovens MM, Davidson BL, Huisman MV. Resolution of thromboemboli in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Chest 2006; 129 (1) 192-197
44 Nijkeuter M, Kwakkel-van Erp H, Söhne M , et al; Christopher Study Investigators. Clinically suspected acute recurrent pulmonary embolism: a diagnostic challenge. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97 (6) 944-948
45 Le Gal G, Kovacs MJ, Carrier M , et al. Validation of a diagnostic approach to exclude recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (5) 752-759
46 Chan WS, Ginsberg JS. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Thromb Res 2002; 107 (3–4) 85-91
47 Nijkeuter M, Geleijns J, De Roos A, Meinders AE, Huisman MV. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: rationalizing fetal radiation exposure in radiological procedures. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2 (10) 1857-1858
48 Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE , et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186 (3) 871-876
49 Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 2002; 224 (2) 487-492
50 Engbers MJ, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR. Venous thrombosis in the elderly: incidence, risk factors and risk groups. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (10) 2105-2112
51 Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. The challenge of diagnosing pulmonary embolism in elderly patients: influence of age on commonly used diagnostic tests and strategies. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (6) 1039-1045
52 Douma RA, le Gal G, Söhne M , et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ 2010; 340: c1475
53 Khorana AA. Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res 2010; 125 (6) 490-493
54 Sohne M, Kruip MJ, Nijkeuter M , et al; Christoper Study Group. Accuracy of clinical decision rule, D-dimer and spiral computed tomography in patients with malignancy, previous venous thromboembolism, COPD or heart failure and in older patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (5) 1042-1046
55 Gosselin MV, Rubin GD, Leung AN, Huang J, Rizk NW. Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. Radiology 1998; 208 (1) 209-215
56 den Exter PL, Hooijer J, Dekkers OM, Huisman MV. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with cancer incidentally diagnosed with pulmonary embolism: a comparison with symptomatic patients. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (17) 2405-2409