Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(07): 515-518
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310522
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Recurrent Shoulder Dystocia: Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors

Joseph G. Ouzounian
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
Robert B. Gherman
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Suneet Chauhan
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
,
Leah R. Battista
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Baldwin Park, California
,
Richard H. Lee
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 October 2011

29 December 2011

Publication Date:
11 April 2012 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objectives To determine the rate and associated risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia (SD).

Study design A retrospective analysis was performed of patients delivered from January 1991 to June 2001. Patients with and without recurrent SD were identified and compared.

Results Among the 267,228 vaginal births during the study period, there were 1904 cases of SD (0.7%) and 270 patients with one additional vaginal birth. The recurrent SD rate was higher than the general population (3.7% versus 0.7%, odds ratio 7.36, 95% confidence interval 3.68 to 14.23, p < 0.001). Patients with recurrent SD had a slightly higher mean birth weight with the second delivery, but this difference was not statistically significant (4173 ± 544 g versus 4017 ± 577 g, p = 0.39).

Conclusion Prior SD is a risk factor for recurrence in a subsequent delivery, but our results demonstrate that the rate appears to be lower than previously estimated. Most variables, including birth weight, do not appear to be useful parameters in predicting recurrence.