Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2011; 24(2): 073-082
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280874
SPECIAL FOCUS SECTION

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Special Considerations for ACL Graft Selection in the Young, Active Military Patient

Jessica H. Ryu1 , CDR Matthew T. Provencher2
  • 1Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 June 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is an extremely common injury in the young, physically demanding active duty military population. The diagnosis of an ACL injury in active duty military personnel often requires special consideration in terms of return to function, reliability, and performance of the knee—often in life-threatening situations when one has to rely on a stable knee for survival. This article outlines the considerations of ACL surgical treatment in the active duty military population, with an emphasis on the young, physically competitive athlete to optimize outcomes. Numerous treatment options and controversies regarding ACL surgery will be reviewed to provide a framework for which to perform a reliable and effective ACL surgery in active duty military personnel.

KEYWORDS

Anterior cruciate ligament - knee injury - military - athlete - ligament

REFERENCES

  • 1 DeFranco M J, Bach Jr B R. A comprehensive review of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  91 (1) 198-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Prodromos C C, Fu F H, Howell S M, Johnson D H, Lawhorn K. Controversies in soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: grafts, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;  16 (7) 376-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Poehling G G, Curl W W, Lee C A et al.. Analysis of outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament repair with 5-year follow-up: allograft versus autograft.  Arthroscopy. 2005;  21 (7) 774-785
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wang J H, Kropf E J, Fu F H. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In: Ryu R K, series ed. The Knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010: 191-203
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Steiner M E, Murray M M, Rodeo S A. Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement.  Am J Sports Med. 2008;  36 (1) 176-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bonnarens F O, Drez D. Clinical examination of the knee for anterior cruciate ligament laxity. In: Jackson D W, Drez D, eds. The Anterior Cruciate Deficient Knee: New Concepts in Ligament Repair. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company; 1987: 72-89
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ryu R K, Dunbar V W H, Morse G G. Meniscal allograft replacement: a 1-year to 6-year experience.  Arthroscopy. 2002;  18 (9) 989-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dempsey A R, Lloyd D G, Elliott B C, Steele J R, Munro B J, Russo K A. The effect of technique change on knee loads during sidestep cutting.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 (10) 1765-1773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Woo S LY, Vogrin T M, Abramowitch S D. Healing and repair of ligament injuries in the knee.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;  8 (6) 364-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Junkin D M, Johnson D L, Fu F H. Knee ligament injuries. In: Kibler B, ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Sports Medicine 4th Edition. 2009. 12: 135-153
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Falciglia F, Mastantuoni G, Guzzanti V. Segond fracture with anterior cruciate ligament tear in an adolescent.  J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;  9 (3) 167-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Feagin Jr J A, Wills R P, Lambert K L, Mott H W, Cunningham R R. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bone-patella tendon-bone versus semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;  341 (341) 69-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Vasiliadis H S, Giakas G, Georgoulis A D. Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Arthroscopy. 2005;  21 (11) 1323-1329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Georgoulis A D, Ristanis S, Moraiti C O et al.. ACL injury and reconstruction: Clinical related in vivo biomechanics.  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;  96 (8, Suppl) S119-S128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (9, Suppl) S21-S34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bedi A, Musahl V, O'Loughlin P et al.. A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.  Am J Sports Med. 2010;  38 (9) 1788-1794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tajima G, Iriuchishima T, Ingham S J et al.. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores patellofemoral contact areas and pressures more closely than nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (10) 1302-1310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 van Eck C F, Schreiber V M, Mejia H A et al.. “Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (9, Suppl) S2-S12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Musahl V, Voos J E, O'Loughlin P F et al.. Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (9, Suppl) S41-S48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T et al.. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques.  Arthroscopy. 2007;  23 (6) 618-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Park S J, Jung Y B, Jung H J et al.. Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a preliminary 2-year prospective study.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (5) 630-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yamamoto Y, Hsu W H, Woo S L et al.. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement.  Am J Sports Med. 2004;  32 (8) 1825-1832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kopf S, Pombo M W, Shen W, Irrgang J J, Fu F H. The ability of 3 different approaches to restore the anatomic anteromedial bundle femoral insertion site during anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Arthroscopy. 2011;  27 (2) 200-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Raffo C S, Pizzarello P, Richmond J C, Pathare N. A reproducible landmark for the tibial tunnel origin in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: avoiding a vertical graft in the coronal plane.  Arthroscopy. 2008;  24 (7) 843-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Jepsen C F, Lundberg-Jensen A K, Faunoe P. Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study.  Arthroscopy. 2007;  23 (12) 1326-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Smith F W, Rosenlund E A, Aune A K, MacLean J A, Hillis S W. Subjective functional assessments and the return to competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Br J Sports Med. 2004;  38 (3) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Greenberg D D, Robertson M, Vallurupalli S, White R A, Allen W C. Allograft compared with autograft infection rates in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;  92 (14) 2402-2408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Carey J L, Dunn W R, Dahm D L, Zeger S L, Spindler K P. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  91 (9) 2242-2250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Barrett G R, Luber K, Replogle W H, Manley J L. Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: tegner activity level and failure rate.  Arthroscopy. 2010;  26 (12) 1593-1601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Shelton W. Anterior cruciate ligament repair. In: Ryu R K, series ed. The Knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010: 178-183
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Joshi S M, Mastrangelo A N, Magarian E M, Fleming B C, Murray M M. Collagen-platelet composite enhances biomechanical and histologic healing of the porcine anterior cruciate ligament.  Am J Sports Med. 2009;  37 (12) 2401-2410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Murray M M, Magarian E M, Harrison S L et al.. The effect of skeletal maturity on functional healing of the anterior cruciate ligament.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;  92 (11) 2039-2049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Beynnon B D, Uh B S, Johnson R J et al.. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals.  Am J Sports Med. 2005;  33 (3) 347-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 van Grinsven S, van Cingel R E, Holla C J, van Loon C J. Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;  18 (8) 1128-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ardern C L, Webster K E, Taylor N F, Feller J A. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery.  Am J Sports Med. 2011;  39 (3) 538-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Grant J A, Mohtadi N G. Two- to 4-year follow-up to a comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Am J Sports Med. 2010;  38 (7) 1389-1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Biau D J, Katsahian S, Kartus J et al.. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data.  Am J Sports Med. 2009;  37 (12) 2470-2478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Goldblatt J P, Fitzsimmons S E, Balk E, Richmond J C. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft.  Arthroscopy. 2005;  21 (7) 791-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Zaffagnini S, Bruni D, Marcheggiani G M et al.. Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;  19 (3) 390-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

CDR Matthew T ProvencherM.D. 

Naval Medical Center San Diego – Division of Sports Surgery

34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 112, San Diego, CA 92134-1112

Email: matthew.provencher@med.navy.mil

      >