Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Imaging Blunt Abdominal Trauma – Indications, Description of the Technique and Imaging Review

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit stumpfem Bauchtrauma werden zunächst mit Ultraschall (US) untersucht, um das freie Bauchwasser zu bewerten. Dabei können allerdings Verletzungen der festen Organe übersehen werden. Obwohl die Computertomografie (CT) die Goldstandardtechnik zur Darstellung von Bauchverletzungen ist, sind deren wohlbekannte Nachteile die zu häufige Anwendung, die ionisierende Strahlung, der nötige Transport des Patienten und mögliche Artefakte. Die kontrastverstärkte Ultrasonografie (CEUS) kann als bildgebendes Verfahren zwischen diesen beiden Methoden angesiedelt werden. Sie entdeckt einfach und verlässlich Verletzungen der Bauchorgane bei Patienten mit energiearmen lokalisierten Traumata und verringert die Anzahl der CT-Untersuchungen. Die Durchführung erfolgt sehr schnell am Bett des Patienten, sodass sich ein Transport erübrigt. Es gibt nur sehr wenige Kontraindikationen und äußerst selten anaphylaktoide Reaktionen. Insgesamt hat sich CEUS als sehr hilfreich bei der anfänglichen Darstellung traumatischer Läsionen von Leber, Niere und Milz sowie bei der Nachuntersuchung der Patienten erwiesen.

Abstract

Patients with blunt abdominal trauma are initially imaged with ultrasound (US) for the evaluation of free abdominal fluid. However, lacerations of solid organs can be overlooked. Although computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard technique for abdominal trauma imaging, overutilization, ionizing radiation, need to transport the patient and potential artifacts are well known disadvantages. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can be used as an imaging tool between the two methods. It can easily and reliably reveal solid abdominal organ injuries in patients with low-energy localized trauma and decrease the number of CT scans performed. It can be rapidly performed at the patient’s bedside with no need for transportation. There are only very few contraindications and anaphylactoid reactions are extremely rare. Altogether, CEUS has proved to be very helpful for the initial imaging of traumatic lesions of the liver, kidney and spleen, as well as for patient follow-up.

abdomen - ultrasound - contrast agents - CEUS

References

• 1 Kretschmer K H, Bohndorf K, Pohlenz O. The role of sonography in abdominal trauma: the European experience.  Emerg Radiol. 1997;  2 62-67
• 2 Yoshii H, Sato M, Yamamoto S et al. Usefulness and limitations of ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.  J Trauma. 1998;  45 45-51
• 3 Healy M A, Simons R K, Winchell R J et al. A prospective evaluation of abdominal ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: is it useful?.  J Trauma. 1996;  40 875-883
• 4 Leen E, Moug S J, Horgan P. Potential impact and utilization of ultrasound contrast media.  Eur Radiol Suppl. 2004;  14 P16-P24
• 5 Scalea T M, Rodriguez A, Chiu W C et al. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference.  J Trauma. 1999;  46 466-472
• 6 Rozycki G S, Ochsner M G, Jaffin J H. A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment.  J Trauma. 1995;  39 492-498
• 7 Brown M A, Sirlin C B, Hoyt D B et al. Screening ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma.  J Intensive Care Med. 2006;  18 253-260
• 8 Pearl W S, Todd K H. Ultrasonography for the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective trials.  Ann Emerg Med. 1996;  27 353-361
• 9 Chiu W C, Cushing B M, Rodriguez A et al. Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST).  J Trauma. 1997;  42 617-625
• 10 Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis S E, Sherbourne C D et al. Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.  Radiology. 1999;  212 423-430
• 11 Thorelius L. Emergency real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for detection of solid organ injuries.  Eur Radiol Suppl. 2007;  17 F107-F112
• 12 Valentino M, Ansaloni L, Catena F et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: considerations after 5 years of experience.  Radiol Med. 2009;  114 1080-1093
• 13 Catalano O, Aiani L, Barozzi L et al. CEUS in abdominal trauma: multi-center study.  Abdom Imaging. 2009;  34 225-234
• 14 Morin S H, Lim A KP, Cobbold J FL et al. Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 5963-5970
• 15 Brannigan M, Burns P N, Wilson S R. Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US.  Radiographics. 2004;  24 921-935
• 16 Cosgrove D, Blomley M. Liver tumors: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Abdom Imaging. 2004;  29 446-454
• 17 Bauer A, Solbiati L. Ultrasound contrast agents. In: Solbiati L, (ed). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver diseases.. Milan: Springer; 2003: 21-26
• 18 Burns P. Contrast ultrasound technology. In: (ed). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver diseases.. Milan: Springer; 2003: 1-18
• 19 Correas J M, Bridal L, Lesavre A et al. Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 1316-1328
• 20 EFSUMB study group . Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)-Update 2008.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 28-44
• 21 Uhlendorf V, Scholle F D, Reinhardt M. Acoustic behaviour of current ultrasound contrast agents.  Ultrasonics. 2000;  38 81-86
• 22 Seitz K, Bernatik T, Strobel D et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions in clinical practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial): CEUS vs. MRI – a prospective comparison in 269 patients.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  31(5) 492-499
• 23 Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions – prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos.  Ultraschall in Med. 2009;  30 383-389
• 24 Bernatik T, Seitz K, Blank W. Unclear focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography – lessons to be learned from the DEGUM multicenter study for the characterization of liver tumors.  Ultraschall in Med. 2010;  31 577-581
• 25 Seitz K. CEUS for Liver Tumors: Facts, Studies, Relevance and Reality in the Clinical Routine.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 485-487
• 26 Main M L, Goldman J H, Grayburn P A. Thinking Outside the “Box” – The Ultrasound Contrast Controversy.  JACC. 2007;  50 2434-2437
• 27 Burns P N, Wilson S R, Simpson D H. Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast.  Invest Radiol. 2000;  35 58-71
• 28 Yegiyants S, Abou-Lahoud G, Taylor E. The management of blunt abdominal trauma patients with computed tomography scan findings of free peritoneal fluid and no evidence of solid organ injury.  Am Surg. 2006;  72 943-946
• 29 Brenchley J, Walker A, Sloan J P et al. Evaluation of focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) by UK emergency physicians.  Emerg Med J. 2006;  23 446-448
• 30 Kornezos I, Chatziioannou A, Kokkonouzis I et al. Findings and limitations of focused ultrasound as a possible screening test in stable adult patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a Greek study.  Eur Radiol. 2010;  20 234-238
• 31 Valentino M, Serra C, Zironi G et al. Emergency Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Detection of Solid Organ Injuries.  AJR. 2006;  186 1361-1367
• 32 Martegani A, Aiani L, Borghi C. The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in large vessels.  Eur Radiol Suppl. 2004;  14 P73-P86
• 33 Catalano O, Cusati B, Nunziata A et al. Active abdominal bleeding: contrast-enhanced sonography.  Abdom Imaging. 2006;  31 9-16
• 34 Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Raso M M et al. Real-Time, Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: A New Tool for Detecting Active Bleeding.  J Trauma. 2005;  59 933-939