Endoscopy 2011; 43(3): 177-183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256095
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett’s esophagus

L.  Alvarez Herrero1,2 , R.  E.  Pouw2 , F.  G.  I.  van Vilsteren2 , F.  J.  W.  ten Kate3 , M.  Visser3 , C.  A.  Seldenrijk4 , M.  I.  van Berge Henegouwen5 , B.  L.  A.  M.  Weusten1 , J.  J.  G.  H.  M.  Bergman2
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Pathology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
  • 5Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 5 August 2010

accepted after revision 16 November 2010

Publication Date:
01 March 2011 (online)

Introduction: Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) is a relatively new technique for endoscopic resection in Barrett’s esophagus. This ligate-cut technique uses a modified variceal band ligator allowing for six consecutive resections without prior submucosal lifting. The aim was to evaluate the safety of MBM and its efficacy for complete endoscopic removal of delineated target areas in Barrett’s esophagus.

Methods: Prospective registration of all MBM procedures in Barrett’s esophagus was carried out between November 2004 and October 2009 in two hospitals. Prior to MBM, the target area was delineated with coagulation markings, followed by endoscopic resection until the delineated area was completely resected. Primary end points were acute (during procedure) plus early complications (< 30 days) and the rate of complete endoscopic resection of the delineated target area.

Results: A total of 243 MBM procedures, with 1060 resections, were performed in 170 patients. MBM was performed for focal lesions (n = 113), for Barrett’s esophagus removal as part of a (stepwise) radical endoscopic resection protocol (n = 117), and as escape treatment after radiofrequency ablation (n = 13). The only acute complication was bleeding (in 3 %, endoscopically managed); no perforations occurred despite absence of submucosal lifting. Early complications consisted of delayed bleeding (in 2 %, endoscopically managed) and stenosis, which occurred in 48 % of patients treated in a (stepwise) radical resection protocol; patients treated for focal lesions or in escape treatment showed no stenosis. Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 91 % of the focal lesions, in 86 % of cases treated under the (stepwise) radical endoscopic resection protocol, and 100 % for escape treatment after radiofrequency ablation.

Conclusion: MBM is a safe and effective technique for the removal of delineated target areas in Barrett’s esophagus.

References

  • 1 Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 58-62
  • 2 Ell C, May A, Gossner L et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 670-677
  • 3 Peters F P, Brakenhoff K P, Curvers W L et al. Endoscopic cap resection for treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia is safe: a prospective analysis of acute and early complications in 216 procedures.  Dis Esophagus. 2007;  20 510-515
  • 4 Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S et al. Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 847-852
  • 5 Seewald S, Ang T L, Omar S et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of early esophageal squamous cell cancer using the Duette mucosectomy kit.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1029-1031
  • 6 Peters F P, Kara M A, Curvers W L et al. Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  19 311-315
  • 7 Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D et al. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  131 1392-1399
  • 8 Peters F P, Kara M A, Rosmolen W D et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1449-1457
  • 9 Pouw R E, Seewald S, Gondrie J J et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett’s oesophagus with early neoplasia in a cohort of 169 patients.  Gut. 2010;  59 1169-1177
  • 10 Van Vilsteren F G, Pouw R E, Seewald S et al. A multi-center randomized trial comparing stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett esophagus containing high-grade dysplasia and/or early cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB133-AB134
  • 11 Pouw R E, Gondrie J J, Sondermeijer C M et al. Eradication of Barrett esophagus with early neoplasia by radiofrequency ablation, with or without endoscopic resection.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;  12 1627-1636
  • 12 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C M et al. Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: results of the first prospective series of 11 patients.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 359-369
  • 13 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C M et al. Effective treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia with stepwise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 370-379
  • 14 Pouw R E, Wirths K, Eisendrath P et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with endoscopic resection for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  8 23-29
  • 15 Pouw R E, Bergman J J. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal and gastric neoplasia.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 929-943
  • 16 Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R E, van Vilsteren F GI et al. Risk of lymph node metastases in deeper invading early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a study based on endoscopic resection specimens.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 1030-1036
  • 17 Peters F P, Brakenhoff K P, Curvers W L et al. Histologic evaluation of resection specimens obtained at 293 endoscopic resections in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 604-609
  • 18 Hamilton S R, Aaltonen L A. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000
  • 19 Gardner M J, Gardner S B, Winter P D. Confidence interval analysis. London: BMJ Books; 1999
  • 20 May A, Gossner L, Behrens A et al. A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 167-175
  • 21 Gerke H, Siddiqui J, Parekh K R et al. Esophageal perforation complicating band ligator-assisted mucosal resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 153-154
  • 22 Pouw R E, Peters F P, Sempoux C et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: report on a Brussels cohort.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 892-898
  • 23 Chennat J, Konda V J, Ross A S et al. Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma – an American single-center experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 2684-2692
  • 24 Katada C, Muto M, Manabe T et al. Esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 165-169
  • 25 Pouw R E, Herrero L A, Van Vilsteren F G et al. A randomized prospective trial in 74 patients comparing the ER-cap technique and multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.  Gut. 2009;  58 A47-A48

J. J. G. H. M. BergmanMD, PhD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Academic Medical Center

Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ, Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31 20 691 7033

Email: j.j.bergman@amc.uva.nl

    >