Endoscopy 2011; 43(2): 87-93
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255919
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Differentiation of colonic polyps by confocal laser endomicroscopy

X.  J.  Xie1 , 2 , C.  Q.  Li1 , X.  L.  Zuo1 , T.  Yu1 , X.  M.  Gu1 , Z.  Li1 , R.  Ji1 , Q.  Wang2 , Y.  Q.  Li1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, China
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 14 November 2009

accepted after revision 26 August 2010

Publication Date:
29 October 2010 (online)

Background and study aim: The real-time identification and removal of adenomas is a cost-effective strategy to improve the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) could provide real-time histological-level observation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CLE diagnosis using a simple classification system that differentiates adenomas from non-neoplastic polyps with intravenous fluorescein staining alone.

Patients and methods: An endoscope integrated confocal laser microscopy system was used in this study. CLE images of 35 colonic polyps, including 15 hyperplastic polyps and 20 adenomas confirmed by histology, were first evaluated to develop criteria for diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. The diagnostic criteria included goblet cell depletion, villous architecture, and microvascular alterations. We then performed a prospective study of colonic polyps found during CLE and classified them according to the established criteria. A total of 115 patients with 115 colonic polyps were included. The real-time CLE diagnosis was compared with that from histology. The stored CLE images were evaluated later by a blinded observer.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of real-time CLE in identifying colonic adenomas were 93.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 85.4 – 97.6), 95.9 % (95 % CI 86.2 – 98.9), 96.9 % (95 % CI 89 – 99), and 92.2 % (95 % CI 81 – 97), respectively, compared with histological results. Interobserver agreement between real-time and post-CLE still-image evaluation was excellent (kappa = 0.929). Goblet cell depletion alone had a sensitivity of 84.9 % (95 % CI 73 – 92) and a specificity of 87.8 % (95 % CI 75 – 95), as well as excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.824).

Conclusions: Endoscope integrated CLE with fluorescein staining may reliably assist in the real-time identification of colonic adenomas. Among three diagnostic categories, goblet cell depletion can be used to distinguish adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

References

  • 1 Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 544-560
  • 2 Wehrmann K, Fruhmorgen P. [Removing adenomas reduces colon carcinoma risk up to 90 %. Effective cancer prevention with the endoscope.] [Article in German.].  MMW Fortschritte der Medizin. 2000;  142 26-29
  • 3 Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T et al. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 1602-1608
  • 4 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 874-882
  • 5 Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M et al. In vivo histology of Barrett’s esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 979-987
  • 6 Sanduleanu S, Driessen A, Hameeteman W et al. Inflammatory cloacogenic polyp: diagnostic features by confocal endomicroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 595-598
  • 7 Sanduleanu S, Driessen A, Gomez-Garcia E et al. In vivo diagnosis and classification of colorectal neoplasia by chromoendoscopy-guided confocal laser endomicroscopy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;  8 371-378
  • 8 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713
  • 9 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Angus E M et al. Identification of epithelial gaps in human small and large intestine by confocal endomicroscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 1769-1778
  • 10 Guo Y T, Li Y Q, Yu T et al. Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia with confocal laser endomicroscopy in vivo: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 547-553
  • 11 Roy H K, Gomes A, Turzhitsky V et al. Spectroscopic microvascular blood detection from the endoscopically normal colonic mucosa: biomarker for neoplasia risk.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 1069-1078
  • 12 Hamilton S R, Aaltonen L A. Pathology and genetics. Tumours of the digestive system.  WHO Classification of Tumours. 2000;  2 2
  • 13 Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.  BMJ. 2003;  326 41-44
  • 14 Levin B, Lieberman D A, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 1570-1595
  • 15 Eisen G M, Kim C Y, Fleischer D E et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 687-694
  • 16 van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B, Curvers W L et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 124-135
  • 17 Kiesslich R, Bergh M von, Hahn M et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1006
  • 18 Hurlstone D P, Thomson M, Brown S et al. Confocal endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis: differentiating dysplasia-associated lesional mass and adenoma-like mass.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1235-1241
  • 19 Wang H W, Willis J, Canto M I et al. Quantitative laser scanning confocal autofluorescence microscopy of normal, premalignant, and malignant colonic tissues.  IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 1999;  46 1246-1252
  • 20 Buchner A M, Shahid M W, Heckman M G et al. Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps.  Gastroenterology. 2010;  138 834-842
  • 21 Goetz M, Toermer T, Vieth M et al. Simultaneous confocal laser endomicroscopy and chromoendoscopy with topical cresyl violet.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 959-968
  • 22 Snover D C, Jass J R, Fenoglio-Preiser C, Batts K P. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;  124 380-391
  • 23 Goetz M, Ziebart A, Foersch S et al. In vivo molecular imaging of colorectal cancer with confocal endomicroscopy by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor.  Gastroenterology. 2010;  138 435-446

Y. Q. LiMD 

Department of Gastroenterology
Shandong University Qilu Hospital

No. 107 Wenhuaxi Road
Jinan
China 250012

Fax: 8653182169236

Email: liyanqing@sdu.edu.cn

    >