The Mathematical Basis of Adjunctive Techniques for Enhancement of Vessel Caliber to Maximize Coupler Ring Size for Microanastomoses

ABSTRACT

The use of ring-pin devices as a nonsuture alternative for microanastomoses is expedient and highly practical, with excellent patency rates. A frequently encountered problem, though, is a significant discrepancy between the donor and recipient vessel lumen size. Rather than accepting the choice of a smaller ring size corresponding to the caliber of the smaller vessel, it may be preferable to instead increase the latter's circumference for potential eversion on the pins by either beveling or “fish-mouthing” the end of the vessel. Arithmetical calculations suggest that a 25% increase in dimensions can thereby be possible at least for thin-walled venous structures. Not only does the capability for selection of a size larger ring simplify drawing the vessel wall through the ring orifice prior to pin impalement, but the resulting larger anastomotic lumen should theoretically increase the potential flow rate across the microanastomosis.

KEYWORDS

Ring-pin coupler - microanastomosis - microsurgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Daniel R K, Olding M. An absorbable anastomotic device for microvascular surgery: experimental studies.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  74(3) 329-336
• 2 Ahn C Y, Shaw W W, Berns S, Markowitz B L. Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93(7) 1481-1484
• 3 Yap L H, Constantinides J, Butler C E. Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  57(6) 666-669
• 4 Sullivan S K, Dellacroce F, Allen R. Management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;  19(6) 377-380
• 5 Hallock G G, Rice D C. Early experience with the new ‘megacoupler’ ring-pins for microvascular anastomoses.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  61(8) 974-976
• 6 Hallock G G, Rice D C. On “Management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler” (J Reconstr Microsurgery 2003;19:377-380) (Letter).  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;  20(1) 59
• 7 Ellipse W. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipse#Circumference
• 8 Hallock G G, Rice D C. Use of a microvascular coupler for repair of major distal upper extremity artery injuries.  J Hand Microsurg. 2009;  1 3-6