Long-term Outcome of Using Posterior-thigh Fasciocutaneous Flaps for the Treatment of Ischial Pressure Sores

ABSTRACT

Among the many difficult problems presented by patients with spinal cord injuries, management of ischial pressure ulcers remains challenging for reconstructive surgeons. This study describes the long-term outcome of using posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flaps for the treatment of ischial pressure sores. Between January 1999 and June 2003, 12 patients with ischial sores were enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent early aggressive surgical debridement followed by surgical reconstruction with a laterally based posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flap. The follow-up period ranged from 24 months to 97 months (mean, 62 months). All the flaps survived, and there were no partial flap losses. Primary-wound healing occurred in all the cases. In two patients, Grade II ischial pressure sores recurred 24 months and 27 months after the operation. There was no recurrence in the other 10 patients. The posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous pedicled flap was a good method for treating ischial bed sores. This flap could be used to treat recurrences observed after primary bed-sore treatment with other methods. The flap was easy to raise, and it did not cause any donor-site morbidity. The long-term outcome of using posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flaps for the treatment of ischial pressure sores was generally good.

Fasciocutaneous flap - pressure sore - reconstruction

REFERENCES

• 1 Petersen N C, Bittmann S. The epidemiology of pressure sores.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;  5 62-66
• 2 Akgüner M, Karaca C, Atabey A, Menderes A, Top H. Surgical treatment for ischial pressure sores with gracilis myocutaneous flap.  J Wound Care. 1998;  7 276-278
• 3 McGregor J C, Buchan A C. Our clinical experience with the tensor fasciae latae myocutaneous flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1980;  33 270-276
• 4 Tobin G R, Sanders B P, Man D, Weiner L J. The biceps femoris myocutaneous advancement flap: a useful modification for ischial pressure ulcer reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1981;  6 396-401
• 5 Stevenson T R, Pollock R A, Rohrich R J, VanderKolk C A. The gluteus maximus musculocutaneous island flap: refinements in design and application.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;  79 761-768
• 6 Jósvay J, Donáth A. Modified hamstring musculocutaneous flap for the coverage of ischial pressure sores.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 1715-1718
• 7 Yu P, Sanger J R, Matloub H S, Gosain A, Larson D. Anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous island flaps in perineoscrotal reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 610-616 discussion 617-618
• 8 Higgins J P, Orlando G S, Blondeel P N. Ischial pressure sore reconstruction using an inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 2002;  55 83-85
• 9 Disa J J, Carlton J M, Goldberg N H. Efficacy of operative cure in pressure sore patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  89 272-278
• 10 Yamamoto Y, Tsutsumida A, Murazumi M, Sugihara T. Long-term outcome of pressure sores treated with flap coverage.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1212-1217
• 11 Foster R D, Anthony J P, Mathes S J, Hoffman W Y. Ischial pressure sore coverage: a rationale for flap selection.  Br J Plast Surg. 1997;  50 374-379
• 12 Gusenoff J A, Redett R J, Nahabedian M Y. Outcomes for surgical coverage of pressure sores in nonambulatory, nonparaplegic, elderly patients.  Ann Plast Surg. 2002;  48 633-640
• 13 Coşkunfirat O K, Ozgentaş H E. Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 2012-2017, discussion 2018–2019