Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26(4): 251-258
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1248233
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The sGAP Flap: Rare Exception or Second Choice in Autologous Breast Reconstruction?

Steffen Baumeister1 , Frank Werdin1 , Alberto Peek2 , 3
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Diakonissenkrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 2Clinic for Plastic – Ästhetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Behandlungszentrum Vogtareuth Krankenhausstrasse, Vogtareuth, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 February 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Various flaps are available for autologous breast reconstruction. However, there is no accepted standard. The superior gluteal artery perforator (sGAP) flap is one possible option for autologous breast reconstruction. Eighty-one sGAP flaps were performed for breast reconstruction. Patient data regarding age, body mass index, medical history, timing of reconstruction, operating time, success of the operation, and complications were retrospectively analyzed. The success rate was 93% (n = 75). Thrombosis occurred in nine flaps, and three revisions were successful. There was no partial necrosis. All but one bilateral breast reconstruction was performed in two stages. The average time between the reconstructions was 3 and 5 months (2 to 6). The average operating time was 7 hours 36 minutes (5′45 to 9′33). For autologous breast reconstruction, there is no universally accepted standard and no flap meets all the requirements. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is our first choice. We favor the sGAP as a second choice particularly for larger breast sizes. For a staged bilateral reconstruction, the sGAP flap advances to be our first choice. The sGAP flap is a safe and reliable perforator flap providing a good breast projection, cosmetically pleasing outcome on the breast, and an acceptable outcome on the buttock with the disadvantage of a demanding dissection.

KEYWORDS

Breast reconstruction - sGAP flap - free flap

REFERENCES

  • 1 Elliott L F, Seify H, Bergey P. The 3-hour muscle-sparing free TRAM flap: safe and effective treatment review of 111 consecutive free TRAM flaps in a private practice setting.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 27-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Granzow J W, Levine J L, Chiu E S, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 571-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Guerra A B, Metzinger S E, Bidros R S et al.. Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: an experience with 280 flaps.  Ann Plast Surg. 2004;  52 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Allen R J, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 32-38
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Paletta C E, Bostwick III J, Nahai F. The inferior gluteal free flap in breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  84 875-883 discussion 884-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Patenotre P, Duquennoy-Martinot V, Capon N, Dumortier R, Pellerin P. [Breast reconstruction using gluteal inferior free flaps. 34 cases in 30 patients].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2001;  46 103-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Allen R J, Tucker Jr C. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 1207-1212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Allen R J. The superior gluteal artery perforator flap.  Clin Plast Surg. 1998;  25 293-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Feller A M, Richter-Heine I, Rudolf K D. [The superior gluteal artery perforator flap (S-GAP-Flap)].  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2002;  34 257-261
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Blondeel P N. The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: a valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 185-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Papp C, Windhofer C, Gruber S. Breast reconstruction with the fasciocutaneous infragluteal free flap (FCI).  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  58 131-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Peek A, Müller M, Exner K. [The free gracilis perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction].  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2002;  34 245-250
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fansa H, Schirmer S, Warnecke I C, Cervelli A, Frerichs O. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis muscle flap: a fast and reliable method for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 1326-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schoeller T, Wechselberger G. Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 2004;  57 481-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Guerra A B, Metzinger S E, Bidros R S, Gill P S, Dupin C L, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases.  Ann Plast Surg. 2004;  52 118-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 De Greef C. [Breast reconstruction by DIEP free flap: about 100 cases].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;  50 56-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P et al.. Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years’ experience.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  61 1309-1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gill P S, Hunt J P, Guerra A B et al.. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 1153-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Tondu T, Monstrey S. Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center’s experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  114 83-89 discussion 90-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schoeller T, Huemer G M, Wechselberger G. The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: guidelines for flap and patient selection.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  122 29-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Allen R J, Levine J L, Granzow J W. The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  118 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Blondeel P N. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 104-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Garvey P B, Buchel E W, Pockaj B A et al.. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1711-1719 discussion 1720-1721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schirmer S, Warnecke I C, Frerichs O, Cervelli A, Fansa H. [Alternative autologous breast reconstruction using the free microvascular gracilis muscle flap with horizontal skin island].  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2008;  40 262-266
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kankaya Y, Ulusoy M G, Oruç M, Yildiz K, Koçer U, Tüccar E. Perforating arteries of the gluteal region: anatomic study.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  56 409-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  91 678-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kroll S S. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 576-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Windhofer C, Brenner E, Moriggl B, Papp C. Relationship between the descending branch of the inferior gluteal artery and the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve applicable to flap surgery.  Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;  24 253-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Granzow J W, Levine J L, Chiu E S, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps.  J Surg Oncol. 2006;  94 441-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Granzow J W, Levine J L, Chiu E S, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 614-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Garvey P B, Buchel E W, Pockaj B A, Gray R J, Samson T D. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 447-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schoeller T, Huemer G M, Kolehmainen M, Otto-Schoeller A, Wechselberger G. Management of subcostal scars during DIEP-flap raising.  Br J Plast Surg. 2004;  57 511-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 De Frene B, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M et al.. Free DIEAP and SGAP flap breast reconstruction after abdominal/gluteal liposuction.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 1031-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Koshima I, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y, Nanba Y. Free gluteal artery perforator flap with a short, small perforator.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  51 200-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tran N V, Buchel E W, Convery P A. Microvascular complications of DIEP flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  119 1397-1405 discussion 1406-1408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Eriksen C, Stark B. The latissimus dorsi flap—still a valuable tool in breast reconstruction: report of 32 cases.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2008;  42 132-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hammond D C. Postmastectomy reconstruction of the breast using the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.  Cancer J. 2008;  14 248-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sternberg E G, Perdikis G, McLaughlin S A, Terkonda S P, Waldorf J C. Latissimus dorsi flap remains an excellent choice for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  56 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Chang D W, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece G P. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 751-759 discussion 760-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Clough K B, Louis-Sylvestre C, Fitoussi A, Couturaud B, Nos C. Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1904-1911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hankins C L, Friedman J. A 7-year experience in utilizing the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for bilateral breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 2008;  60 134-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rosenberg J J, Chandawarkar R, Ross M I, Chevray P M. Bilateral anterolateral thigh flaps for large-volume breast reconstruction.  Microsurgery. 2004;  24 281-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Granzow J W, Levine J L, Chiu E S, LoTempio M M, Allen R J. Breast reconstruction with perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  120 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Guerra A B, Soueid N, Metzinger S E et al.. Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps.  Ann Plast Surg. 2004;  53 305-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten G G, Monstrey S J et al.. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1997;  50 322-330
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Nahabedian M Y, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson P N. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 466-475 discussion 476-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Steffen BaumeisterM.D. 

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Diakonissenkrankenhaus

Holzhausenstrasse 72-92, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Email: stbaumeister@yahoo.com

      >