Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Maternal Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis in the Pregnant Patient

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic diseases during pregnancy can be challenging. Ultrasonography has been the traditional first-line imaging tool in evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis in a pregnant patient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most useful methods in management of pregnant women in recent years. It does not expose mother and fetus to ionizing radiation and provides cross-sectional images in any plane with high anatomic resolution even without intravenous contrast administration. The goals of this article are to discuss the role of MRI in the evaluation of maternal diseases involving the abdomen and pelvis and to review the MRI findings of these diseases.

KEYWORDS

abdomen - magnetic resonance - pregnanacy

REFERENCES

• 1 Swartz H M, Reichling B A. Hazards of radiation exposure for pregnant women.  JAMA. 1978;  239 1907-1908
• 2 International Commission on Radiological Protection .Pregnancy and Irradiation. Annals of ICRP. Vol. 30. Stockholm, Sweden; Elsevier 2000: 1-43 Publication 84
• 3 Forstner R, Kalbhen C L, Filly R A et al.. Abdominal MR imaging in the non obstetric evaluation of pregnant patients.  Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  166 1139-1144
• 4 Oto A. MR imaging evaluation of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006;  14 489-501
• 5 Brown M A, Claude B S. Female pelvis.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;  13 381-395
• 6 Kanal E, Barkovich A J, Bell C et al.. ACR guidance document for safe practices: 2007.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  188 1447-1474
• 7 Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R et al.. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.  Radiology. 2005;  236 204-213
• 8 Leyendecker J R, Childs D D. Kidneys and MR urography.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;  15 373-382
• 9 Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh A D et al.. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy.  Radiology. 2006;  238 891-898
• 10 Parangi S, Levine D, Henry A et al.. Surgical gastrointestinal disorders during pregnancy.  Am J Surg. 2007;  193 223-232
• 11 Pedrosa I, Zeikus E A, Levine D et al.. MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and nonpregnant patients.  Radiographics. 2007;  27 721-743
• 12 Fidler J. MR imaging of the small bowel.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;  45 317-331
• 13 Fulcher A S, Turne M A, Capps G W. MRCP: technical advances and clinical applications.  Radiographics. 1999;  19 25-41
• 14 Spencer J A, Chahal R, Kelly A, Taylor K, Eardley I, Lloyd S N. Evaluation of painful hydronephrosis in pregnancy: magnetic resonance urographic patterns in physiological dilatation versus calculous obstruction.  J Urol. 2004;  171 256-260
• 15 Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S et al.. Ovarian torsion: CT and MR imaging appearances.  Radiology. 1994;  190 337-342
• 16 Schmeler K M, Mayo-Smith W W, Peipert J F et al.. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  105 1098-1103
• 17 Kier R, McCarthy S M, Scoutt L M et al.. Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging.  Radiology. 1990;  176 709-713
• 18 Katz V L, Dotters D J, Dregemeuller W. Complications of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1989;  73 593-596
• 19 Amant F, van Calsteren K, Vergote I, Ottevargen N. Gynecologic oncology in pregnancy.  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;  67 187-195
• 20 Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 1539-1549
• 21 Leslie K K, Lange C A. Breast cancer and pregnancy.  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;  32 547-558
• 22 Kamel I R, Kruskal J B, Gramm H F. Imaging of abdominal manifestations of melanoma.  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1998;  39 447-486