Am J Perinatol 2008; 25(10): 623-628
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1090583
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Cue-Based Feeding for Preterm Infants: A Prospective Trial

Barbara Puckett1 , Vaneeta Kaur Grover2 , Tanya Holt1 , Koravangattu Sankaran1
  • 1Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Weitere Informationen


07. Oktober 2008 (online)


We set out to test whether premature infants were able to be fed orally on feeding cues and be discharged home earlier than infants fed by traditional feeding regimens. Attainment of adequate growth, adverse events, and nursing time to provide care were also assessed. After screening, the recruited premature infants (< 36 wks post-conceptual age [PCA]) were divided into two feeding regimens. A control group of 40 infants was fed using an initial combination of scheduled gavage and bottle feeding and then graduating to demand feeds. The intervention group comprised 39 neonates who had gavage feeds discontinued at study entrance and fed orally on cues. Outcomes measured were: weight gain in grams/kg/day, length of stay (in days) after enrollment, PCA on entrance and at discharge, adverse events during feeding, number of cues per feed in the intervention group, and resource utilization using nurse/patient ratios. Differences between groups were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, and regression analysis. Two-tailed p values of < 0.05 were considered significant. There was no difference between groups in the mean weight gain; in the control group mean weight gain was 12.5 gm/kg/day and in the intervention group 12.1 gm/kg/day (p = 0.83). The average length of stay in the control group of 14.5 days was significantly longer than the 10.0 days in the intervention group (p = 0.009). This difference remained significant after adjusting for gestational age at birth in regression analysis. The average total number of adverse events in the control group (12.5 events) was significantly greater than in the intervention group (3.5 events; p = 0.007). The mean PCA on study entry was 34.4 wks in both groups and on exit 36.5 wks in the control group and 35.8 wks in the intervention group, a significant difference (p = 0.02), The intervention group elicited 2.8 cues/feed. The nurse to patient ratios was equal in both groups throughout the study period. Cue-based feeding was possible for premature infants with similar weight gain as traditional feeding without affecting workload. Hospitalization and adverse events were decreased.


Barbara PuckettB.Sc.N. M.S./N.N.P. R.N.(N.P.) N.I.C.U. 

Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon Health Region 103 Hospital Drive

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada