Pharmacopsychiatry 2009; 42(1): 1-8
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083818
Original Paper

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Randomized, Open-label Trial Comparing Methadone and Levo-Alpha-Acetylmethadol (LAAM) in Maintenance Treatment of Opioid Addiction

J. Wolstein 1 , 2 , M. Gastpar 1 , T. Finkbeiner 1 , C. Heinrich 3 , R. Heitkamp 4 , T. Poehlke 5 , N. Scherbaum 6
  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rhine State Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • 2Department of Psychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
  • 3Institute for Medical Research Management and Biometrics GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
  • 4Methadone Maintenance Clinic, Cologne, Germany
  • 5Methadone Maintenance Clinic, Münster, Germany
  • 6Addiction Research Group at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Rhine State Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received 01.07.2007 revised 14.05.2008

accepted 19.05.2008

Publication Date:
19 January 2009 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Levo-Alpha-Acetylmethadol (LAAM) is a synthetic opioid analgesic with μ-agonistic activity and a long duration of action. There are several, almost exclusively US American studies showing the efficacy of LAAM as a maintenance drug which has the advantage that it needs to be administered only three times a week. LAAM is currently not marketed in EU countries due to cardiac complications. We report on the first European multi-center, parallel group, flexible dose, open-label, randomized clinical trial comparing LAAM and methadone in patients with opioid dependence.

Methods: Eighty-four opioid addicts in ongoing maintenance treatment with stable methadone doses were treated with methadone under study conditions for 5 weeks (run-in phase), then randomly assigned to a methadone (n=41) or a LAAM (n=43) group. Study duration was 24 weeks after randomization. Objective measures (drug urine screenings, retention rate), subjective measures (symptoms of withdrawal and craving, report of substance use), and safety data were collected weekly. The main outcome criterion was the number of opiate-free urine samples per number of weeks of study participation.

Results: Non-inferiority was shown for LAAM compared to methadone. Both substances were well tolerated. There were no clinical cardiac complications in either group.

Discussion: Our study confirmed the results of previous investigations with LAAM as being efficacious and well tolerated in opioid dependence. A discussion to reconsider the availability of LAAM is recommended.

References

Correspondence

Prof. Dr. N. Scherbaum

Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine

Rhine State Hospital

University of Duisburg-Essen

Virchowstr. 174

45147 Essen

Germany

Phone: +49/201/7227 180/254

Fax: +49/201/7227 180/254

Email: norbert.scherbaum@uni-due.de