Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2756-0076
Anatomical Analysis of the Femoral Insertions of the Lateral Collateral Ligament and Popliteal Tendon in the Chilean Population: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Authors
Funding Information This research has not received specific funding from public sector agencies, commercial entities, or nonprofit organizations.
Abstract
Injuries to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee can significantly impair stability and function. In particular, variations in the femoral insertions of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteal tendon (PT) may affect surgical planning for PLC injuries. However, these anatomical features are underexplored in the Chilean population. This study seeks to characterize the femoral insertions of the LCL and PT in Chilean patients based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at a single center, including 43 patients aged 18 and older who underwent knee MRI scans. Imaging was performed using a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner with isotropic voxel dimensions of 0.65 × 0.65 × 0.65 mm. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently measured the distance between the centroids of the LCL and PT insertion points on the femur. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interobserver reliability, and a paired t-test was used to compare the measurements. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among the 43 patients (51.2% male, 48.8% right knees), the average distance between the LCL and PT insertion centroids was 11.7 mm (standard deviation: 1.61). The measurements by the two radiologists were similar (observer 1: 11.5 mm; observer 2: 11.8 mm), with no significant differences (p = 0.326). The ICC for interobserver agreement was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.69–0.91), indicating high reliability. In this Chilean cohort, the average distance between the LCL and PT femoral insertions was 11.7 mm, a value that differs from previously reported ranges. These findings may help refine surgical approaches to PLC injuries.
Level of evidence
Level III, cross-sectional observational study.
Keywords
posterolateral corner - lateral collateral ligament - popliteal tendon - distance - insertionsData Availability Statement
We also declare that all information and dataset related to the study is available in digital format at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1mZHjcuJdt0_dXu5CeEeXelUIIRr1mMLy and can be shared upon a reasonable request for academic purposes only.
Ethical Approval
The authors of this study declare that the following work has received approval from the ethics committee of our hospital (Comité de Ética Clínica del Hospital del Trabajador), and we consent to its publication.
Publication History
Received: 29 October 2024
Accepted: 25 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
27 November 2025
Article published online:
08 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (02) 233-242
- 2 Grood ES, Stowers SF, Noyes FR. Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70 (01) 88-97
- 3 Veltri DM, Deng XH, Torzilli PA, Maynard MJ, Warren RF. The role of the popliteofibular ligament in stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (01) 19-27
- 4 Terry GC, LaPrade RF. The posterolateral aspect of the knee. Anatomy and surgical approach. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (06) 732-739
- 5 Jakobsen BW, Lund B, Christiansen SE, Lind MC. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee: a case series with isolated reconstructions in 27 patients. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (07) 918-925
- 6 LaPrade RF, Wentorf FA, Fritts H, Gundry C, Hightower CD. A prospective magnetic resonance imaging study of the incidence of posterolateral and multiple ligament injuries in acute knee injuries presenting with a hemarthrosis. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (12) 1341-1347
- 7 LaPrade RF, Muench C, Wentorf F, Lewis JL. The effect of injury to the posterolateral structures of the knee on force in a posterior cruciate ligament graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (02) 233-238
- 8 Harner CD, Vogrin TM, Höher J, Ma CB, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Deficiency of the posterolateral structures as a cause of graft failure. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (01) 32-39
- 9 LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (06) 854-860
- 10 Takeda S, Tajima G, Fujino K. et al. Morphology of the femoral insertion of the lateral collateral ligament and popliteus tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (10) 3049-3054
- 11 Sobrado MF, Helito CP, Melo LDP, Asperti AM, Gobbi RG, Angelini FJ. Anatomical study of the posterolateral ligament complex of the knee: LCL and popliteus tendon. Acta Ortop Bras 2021; 29 (05) 249-252
- 12 Saini NK, Yadav S, Jain VK, Shukla A. Measurement of distance between femoral insertion of fibular collateral ligament and popliteus tendon: a magnetic resonance imaging based study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 17: 139-142
- 13 Kim HH, Kim DH, Lee GC. et al. Is the popliteus tendon always inserted antero-inferiorly 18.5 mm from the lateral collateral ligament of the femur? Magnetic resonance imaging and cadaveric evaluations. Knee 2021; 32: 148-158
- 14 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
- 15 Brinkman JM, Schwering PJ, Blankevoort L, Kooloos JG, Luites J, Wymenga AB. The insertion geometry of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (10) 1364-1368
- 16 Kim JG, Ha JG, Lee YS, Yang SJ, Jung JE, Oh SJ. Posterolateral corner anatomy and its anatomical reconstruction with single fibula and double femoral sling method: anatomical study and surgical technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (03) 381-385
- 17 Takubo A, Ryu K, Iriuchishima T, Nagaoka M, Tokuhashi Y, Aizawa S. The evaluation of the distance between the popliteus tendon and the lateral collateral ligament footprint and the implant in total knee arthroplasty using a 3-dimensional template. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21 (01) 322
- 18 Camarda L, Condello V, Madonna V, Cortese F, D'Arienzo M, Zorzi C. Results of isolated posterolateral corner reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11 (02) 73-79
- 19 Cooley VJ, Harrington RM, Larson RV. Effect of lateral ligament reconstruction on intra-articular posterior cruciate ligament graft force and knee motion. Univ Washington Res Report 1996; 14: 37-41
- 20 Sekiya JK, Kurtz CA. Posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee: surgical technique utilizing a bifid Achilles tendon allograft and a double femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (11) 1400
- 21 LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A. An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (06) 1405-1414
- 22 Arciero RA. Anatomic posterolateral corner knee reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (09) 1147
- 23 Nannaparaju M, Mortada S, Wiik A, Khan W, Alam M. Posterolateral corner injuries: epidemiology, anatomy, biomechanics and diagnosis. Injury 2018; 49 (06) 1024-1031
- 24 Mariani PP, Becker R, Rihn J, Margheritini F. Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. An anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review. Knee 2003; 10 (04) 311-324
- 25 Chahla J, Kennedy NI, Cinque ME. et al. Posterolateral corner injuries of the knee at the national football league combine: an imaging and outcomes analysis. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (03) 687-692