Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2726-4717
Long-Term Implications of Combined Cross-Facial Nerve Graft and Nerve Transfer in Facial Paralysis
Authors
Abstract
Background
Assessing the long-term implications of combining cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG) and masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer on long-term outcomes in patients with subacute facial paralysis.
Methods
Patients with subacute facial palsy who underwent a masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with CFNG from 2013 to 2020 were reviewed. A minimum of 2-year follow-up was required with 18 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Midface and periorbital measurements on standardized photos of patients in repose, closed, and open smile were analyzed preoperatively, 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively as available. Emotrics software (Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA) and ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., U.S, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) were used for measurements. Longitudinal comparisons at each timepoint were analyzed using Wilcoxon two-sample testing.
Results
In repose, 1-year measurements including Commissure-Position, Smile-Angle, and Upper-Lip–Height-Deviation, were nonsignificant, whereas significance was noted at 3 years postoperatively (p = 0.042, 0.031, 0.042, respectively). Midface dynamic smile measurements on the palsy side and with symmetry showed significant differences from preoperative measurements at 1 and 3 years postoperatively. Periorbital measurements, including Marginal-Reflex-Distance-1, Marginal-Reflex-Distance-2, and Palpebral-Fissure-Height in repose, showed no significant changes at 1 year but were significant at 3 years (p = 0.004, 0.011, and 0.002, respectively), while during animation were significant at 1 and 3 years postoperatively.
Conclusion
Combining CFNG with nerve transfer demonstrated progressive long-term improvement in resting tone and symmetry around the midface and periorbital region. Expected improvements were observed during animation over time.
Publication History
Received: 22 March 2025
Accepted: 07 October 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
25 October 2025
Article published online:
13 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Zhang S, Hembd A, Ching CW, Tolley P, Rozen SM. Early masseter to facial nerve transfer may improve smile excursion in facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (11) e2023
- 2 Humphrey CD, Kriet JD. Nerve repair and cable grafting for facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (02) 170-176
- 3 Kim L, Byrne PJ. Controversies in contemporary facial reanimation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (03) 275-297
- 4 Lee EI, Hurvitz KA, Evans GR, Wirth GA. Cross-facial nerve graft: past and present. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (03) 250-256
- 5 Klebuc MJA. Facial reanimation using the masseter-to-facial nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (05) 1909-1915
- 6 Bianchi B, Ferri A, Ferrari S. et al. Cross-facial nerve graft and masseteric nerve cooptation for one-stage facial reanimation: principles, indications, and surgical procedure. Head Neck 2014; 36 (02) 235-240
- 7 Hontanilla B, Marré D. Comparison of hemihypoglossal nerve versus masseteric nerve transpositions in the rehabilitation of short-term facial paralysis using the Facial Clima evaluating system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 662e-672e
- 8 Terzis JK, Tzafetta K. The “babysitter” procedure: minihypoglossal to facial nerve transfer and cross-facial nerve grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (03) 865-876
- 9 Faria JC, Scopel GP, Ferreira MC. Facial reanimation with masseteric nerve: babysitter or permanent procedure? Preliminary results. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (01) 31-34
- 10 Coombs CJ, Ek EW, Wu T, Cleland H, Leung MK. Masseteric-facial nerve coaptation–an alternative technique for facial nerve reinnervation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (12) 1580-1588
- 11 Borschel GH, Kawamura DH, Kasukurthi R, Hunter DA, Zuker RM, Woo AS. The motor nerve to the masseter muscle: an anatomic and histomorphometric study to facilitate its use in facial reanimation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (03) 363-366
- 12 Wang W, Yang C, Li Q, Li W, Yang X, Zhang YX. Masseter-to-facial nerve transfer: a highly effective technique for facial reanimation after acoustic neuroma resection. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (Suppl. 01) S63-S69
- 13 Yang SF, Xie Y, Kim JC. Outcomes of facial symmetry and tone at rest after masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; 23 (05) 357-361
- 14 Collar RM, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO. The subzygomatic triangle: rapid, minimally invasive identification of the masseteric nerve for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 183-188
- 15 Wang W, Yang C, Li W, Li Q, Zhang Y. Masseter-to-facial nerve transfer: is it possible to rehabilitate the function of both the paralyzed eyelid and the oral commissure?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (06) 1353-1360
- 16 Sforza C, Tarabbia F, Mapelli A. et al. Facial reanimation with masseteric to facial nerve transfer: a three-dimensional longitudinal quantitative evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (10) 1378-1386
- 17 Murphey AW, Clinkscales WB, Oyer SL. Masseteric nerve transfer for facial nerve paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (02) 104-110
- 18 Chen G, Wang W, Wang W, Ding W, Yang X. Symmetry restoration at rest after masseter-to-facial nerve transfer: is it as efficient as smile reanimation?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (04) 793-801
- 19 Garcia RM, Hadlock TA, Klebuc MJ, Simpson RL, Zenn MR, Marcus JR. Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1025e-1046e
- 20 Snyder-Warwick AK, Fattah AY, Zive L, Halliday W, Borschel GH, Zuker RM. The degree of facial movement following microvascular muscle transfer in pediatric facial reanimation depends on donor motor nerve axonal density. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (02) 370e-381e
- 21 Terzis JK, Wang W, Zhao Y. Effect of axonal load on the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the cross-facial nerve graft procedure for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1499-1512
- 22 Chan JY, Byrne PJ. Management of facial paralysis in the 21st century. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (04) 346-357
- 23 Terzis JK, Konofaos P. Experience with 60 adult patients with facial paralysis secondary to tumor extirpation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 51e-66e
- 24 Rozen SM. Facial reanimation: basic surgical tools and creation of an effective toolbox for treating patients with facial paralysis: part B. Nerve transfer combined with cross-facial nerve grafting in the acute facial palsy patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 725-727
- 25 Spira M. Anastomosis of masseteric nerve to lower division of facial nerve for correction of lower facial paralysis. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61 (03) 330-334
- 26 Morley SE. Combining an end to side nerve to masseter transfer with cross face nerve graft for functional upgrade in partial facial paralysis-an observational cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (07) 1446-1454
- 27 Mohanty AJ, Perez JL, Hembd A, Thrikutam NP, Bartley J, Rozen SM. Orbicularis oculi muscle reinnervation confers corneal protective advantages over static interventions alone in the subacute facial palsy patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (03) 791-801
- 28 Cheng A, Audolfsson T, Rodriguez-Lorenzo A, Wong C, Rozen S. A reliable anatomic approach for identification of the masseteric nerve. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (10) 1438-1440
- 29 Thachil R, Wen YE, Madrazo AZ, Sanchez CV, Reisch JS, Rozen SM. Dual versus single innervation of gracilis free functional muscle transfer in facial paralysis - long-term resting and dynamic outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 154 (03) 633-648
- 30 Wen YE, Thachil RL, Madrazo AZ, Sanchez CV, Reisch JS, Rozen SM. Dual-innervated gracilis free functional muscle transfers in facial palsy patients: comparing long-term outcomes between one- versus two-stage procedures. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (07) 511-526
- 31 Dusseldorp JR, van Veen MM, Guarin DL, Quatela O, Jowett N, Hadlock TA. Spontaneity assessment in dually innervated gracilis smile reanimation surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (06) 551-557
- 32 Kollar B, Weiss JBW, Kiefer J, Eisenhardt SU. Functional outcome of dual reinnervation with cross-facial nerve graft and masseteric nerve transfer for facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (06) 1178e-1190e
- 33 Ueda K, Harii K, Yamada A. Long-term follow-up of nerve conduction velocity in cross-face nerve grafting for the treatment of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (06) 1146-1149
- 34 Weiss JBW, Spuerck F, Kollar B, Eisenhardt SU. Age-related outcome of facial reanimation surgery using cross face nerve graft and gracilis free functional muscle transfer-a retrospective cohort study. Microsurgery 2022; 42 (06) 557-567
- 35 Hembd A, Nagarkar P, Perez J. et al. Correlation between facial nerve axonal load and age and its relevance to facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1459-1464
- 36 Rozen SM, Harrison BL, Isaacson B. et al. Intracranial facial nerve grafting in the setting of skull base tumors: global and regional facial function analysis and possible implications for facial reanimation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 267-278
