J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-4139
Original Article

Safety and Utility of Superficial Circumflex Iliac Perforator versus Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Flaps in Pediatric Reconstructive Surgery

Authors

  • Noelle Garbaccio

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    2   Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Dorien I. Schonebaum

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Jade E. Smith

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Justin J. Cordero

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Lacey Foster

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Morvarid Mehdizadeh

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Arriyan S. Dowlatshahi

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Samuel J. Lin

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Abstract

Background

The superficial circumflex iliac perforator flap (SCIP-f) is a thinned adaptation of the superficial circumflex iliac artery flap (SCIA-f) that may have superior use flexibility, smaller scar burden, and lesser need for revision, advantages well-suited to pediatric patients. Despite documented success in adults, the safety and utility of SCIP and SCIA-f are underexplored in pediatric populations.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified 93 articles reporting SCIP/SCIA-f outcomes in patients ≤ 17 years of age. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Cohorts were stratified by SCIP/SCIA and age group. Mann–Whitney U tests compared cohort outcomes.

Results

Thirty-one studies were included, constituting 107 SCIA-f and 57 SCIP-f, with ages 10 weeks to 17 years. Most cases were congenital or traumatic defects in upper/lower extremities. Compared with SCIA-f, SCIP-f demonstrated significantly lower rates of all-cause complications, total flap loss, major and minor complications, and debulking (p < 0.05). All-cause complication rates were also significantly lower across age groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety of SCIP-f in children with congenital and traumatic defects, especially of the extremities. SCIP-f may be considered a reliable option for pediatric reconstruction. Additionally, fewer subsequent procedures for contouring may be required.

Contributors' Statement

N.G. designed the study; N.G., D.I.S, and J.E.S. reviewed articles for inclusion; N.G. and D.I.S. extracted the data; J.J.C. scored article quality; N.G. analyzed the data; N.G. and D.I.S. wrote the manuscript; J.E.S., L.F., M.M, J.J.C. edited the manuscript; S.J.L. guided all activities and edited the final manuscript.


Co-first author.




Publication History

Received: 05 May 2025

Accepted: 20 September 2025

Article published online:
17 November 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA