Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2708-5392
Direct Neck Lift in Men
Authors

Abstract
Aims and Backgrounds
Direct submentoplasty remains a valuable alternative to rhytidectomy in male patients, addressing cervical laxity and fullness while avoiding feminization, periauricular scars, and prolonged recovery associated with traditional rhytidectomy.
Historical Aspects
Since the early 20th century, submental skin excision has undergone refinement, progressing from horizontal ellipses to advanced configurations such as the Grecian urn pattern. These modifications aim to optimize scar camouflage while correcting horizontal and vertical redundancy.
Anatomy
Key anatomic contributors to cervical aging include skin and platysmal laxity, supra- and subplatysmal fat, anterior belly of the digastric hypertrophy, ptotic submandibular glands, and a low-lying hyoid. Comprehensive preoperative analysis is required to address these factors.
Patient Selection
For patients presenting with submental fullness accompanied by good skin elasticity and minimal skin laxity, an isolated deep structural neck lift without skin excision may be sufficient. Optimal candidates for direct cervicoplasty (skin excision) demonstrate submental laxity limited to above the thyroid cartilage, minimal jowling, and acceptance of an anterior cervical scar.
Techniques
The isolated deep structural neck lift addresses the platysma and its underlying structures without the need for skin excision. A direct cervicoplasty with skin excision affords wide exposure for addressing the skin, platysma, and the subplatysmal anatomy. Skin excision patterns are varied and tailored to the patient's needs.
Postoperative Care
Scar modulation strategies, drain management, lymphatic assistance with positioning/massage, and salivary flow management are key to a hastened recovery.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
Direct submentoplasty remains an essential tool in the aging male patient, offering reproducible results in appropriately selected patients who are willing to accept its limitations.
Publication History
Received: 21 September 2025
Accepted: 23 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 September 2025
Article published online:
07 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 The Aesthetic Society in collaboration with CosmetAssure. 2023 Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Stats. 2023 . Accessed September 25, 2025 at: https://cdn.theaestheticsociety.org/media/statistics/2023-TheAestheticSocietyStatistics.pdf
- 2 The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2024 Procedural Statistics Release. 2024 . Accessed September 25, 2025 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/news/statistics/2024/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2024.pdf
- 3 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Procedural Statistics Release. 2024 . Accessed September 25, 2025 at: https://www.isaps.org/media/razfvmsk/isaps-global-survey-2024.pdf
- 4 Pérez P, Hohman MH. Neck Rejuvenation. [Updated September 4, 2023]. In: StatPearls (Internet). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. . Accessed September 25, 2025 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562229/
- 5 Rohrich RJ, Rios JL, Smith PD, Gutowski KA. Neck rejuvenation revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (05) 1251-1263
- 6 Jordan JR, Yellin S. Direct cervicoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 451-461
- 7 Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (06) 826-837
- 8 Kochuba AL, Surek CC, Ordenana C. et al. Anterior approach to the neck: Long-term follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (08) 861-870
- 9 Gu JT, Wang TD, Loyo M. Direct neck lift for men. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2024; 32 (03) 353-360
- 10 Maliniak JW. Is the surgical restoration of the aged face justified? Indications, method of repair, end result. Med J Rec 1932; 135: 321-324
- 11 Johnson JB. The problem of the aging face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1955; 15 (02) 117-121
- 12 Zins JE, Fardo D. The “anterior-only” approach to neck rejuvenation: an alternative to face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (06) 1761-1768
- 13 Miller TA, Orringer JS. Excision of neck redundancy with single Z-plasty closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (01) 219-221
- 14 Morel-Fatio D. Cosmetic surgery of the face, 1: cosmetic surgery of the face (other than rhinoplasty). Mod Trends Plast Surg 1964; 16: 216-232
- 15 Ehlert TK, Thomas JR, Becker Jr FF. Submental W-plasty for correction of ‘turkey gobbler’ deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116 (06) 714-717
- 16 Perkins SW, Gibson FB. Use of submentoplasty to enhance cervical recontouring in face-lift surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (02) 179-183
- 17 Cronin TD, Biggs TM. The T-Z-plasty for the male “turkey gobbler” neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 47 (06) 534-538
- 18 Miller TA. Excision of redundant neck tissue in men with platysma plication and Z-plasty closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 304-313
- 19 Bitner JB, Friedman O, Farrior RT, Cook TA. Direct submentoplasty for neck rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (03) 194-200
- 20 Farrior RT, Jarchow RC, Farrior EH. Surgical Principles in Face-lift: Instructional Courses. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1990. Vol. 3. 215-226
- 21 Hamilton JM. Submental lipectomy with skin excision. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (03) 443-447 , discussion 448