Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2701-9312
Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence
Authors
Funding This work was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health under grants (grant nos.: R01CA212014, R01CA251686, R01CA263322, and R01CA285976).

Abstract
In this review, we summarize recent evidence from approximately the last 5 years across the lung cancer screening (LCS) care continuum. First, we review the results from the NELSON trial, from the extended follow-up of other LCS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and from a meta-analysis of RCTs. Together, these RCTs reported a 16% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality for low-dose CT (LDCT) LCS versus non-LDCT controls. Next, we summarize updates to clinical guidelines and recommendations around LCS in the United States, noting the current debate around the use of time since quit as an eligibility criterion. We also discuss the implementation of LCS focusing on the following areas: (1) global landscape, (2) selection criteria and approach, (3) LCS program structure, (4) shared decision making, (5) smoking cessation, (6) LCS uptake, (7) American College of Radiology Lung Reporting and Data System, (8) annual LCS adherence, (9) screen-detected findings and management, (10) incidental findings and management, and (11) disparities. Lastly, we highlight emerging data and considerations for personalized LCS and new technologies, with an emphasis on risk prediction models, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence. This review highlights the latest changes to LCS and the ongoing need to monitor and evaluate LCS as it diffuses into clinical practice across various real-world settings.
Publication History
Received: 31 July 2025
Accepted: 15 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
16 September 2025
Article published online:
16 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74 (03) 229-263
- 2 Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD. et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (05) 395-409
- 3 de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (06) 503-513
- 4 National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Lung cancer incidence and mortality with extended follow-up in the national lung screening trial. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14 (10) 1732-1742
- 5 Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR. et al; DANTE Study Group. Long-term follow-up results of the DANTE Trial, a randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191 (10) 1166-1175
- 6 Wille MM, Dirksen A, Ashraf H. et al. Results of the randomized Danish lung cancer screening trial with focus on high-risk profiling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193 (05) 542-551
- 7 Doroudi M, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM. Lung cancer mortality in the lung screening study feasibility trial. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2018; 2 (03) pky042
- 8 Becker N, Motsch E, Trotter A. et al. Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial. Int J Cancer 2020; 146 (06) 1503-1513
- 9 Pastorino U, Silva M, Sestini S. et al. Prolonged lung cancer screening reduced 10-year mortality in the MILD trial: new confirmation of lung cancer screening efficacy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30 (07) 1162-1169
- 10 Paci E, Puliti D, Lopes Pegna A. et al; the ITALUNG Working Group. Mortality, survival and incidence rates in the ITALUNG randomised lung cancer screening trial. Thorax 2017; 72 (09) 825-831
- 11 Field JK, Vulkan D, Davies MPA. et al. Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and international meta-analysis. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 10: 100179
- 12 Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The national lung screening trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer 2013; 119 (22) 3976-3983
- 13 Bonney A, Malouf R, Marchal C. et al. Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 8 (08) CD013829
- 14 Kim J, Lee H, Huang BW. Lung cancer: diagnosis, treatment principles, and screening. Am Fam Physician 2022; 105 (05) 487-494
- 15 Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH. et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144 (01) 33-38
- 16 Wolf AMD, Oeffinger KC, Shih TY. et al. Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74 (01) 50-81
- 17 Mazzone PJ, Silvestri GA, Souter LH. et al. Screening for lung cancer: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2021; 160 (05) e427-e494
- 18 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Screening for Lung Cancer with Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Decision Summary. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncacal-decision-memo.aspx?proposed=N&ncaid=304
- 19 Wood DE, Kazerooni EA, Aberle DR. et al. NCCN guidelines insights: lung cancer screening, version 1.2025. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2025; 23 (01) e250002
- 20 Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 962-970
- 21 Henderson LM, Rivera MP, Basch E. Broadened eligibility for lung cancer screening: challenges and uncertainty for implementation and equity. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 939-941
- 22 Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM. et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 971-987
- 23 Meza R, Jeon J, Toumazis I. et al. Evaluation of the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 988-997
- 24 Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160 (05) 330-338
- 25 Toumazis I, de Nijs K, Cao P. et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7 (12) 1833-1842
- 26 Kondo KK, Rahman B, Ayers CK, Relevo R, Griffin JC, Halpern MT. Lung cancer diagnosis and mortality beyond 15 years since quit in individuals with a 20+ pack-year history: a systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74 (01) 84-114
- 27 Landy R, Cheung LC, Young CD, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA. Absolute lung cancer risk increases among individuals with >15 quit-years: analyses to inform the update of the American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. Cancer 2024; 130 (02) 201-215
- 28 Meza R, Cao P, de Nijs K. et al. Assessing the impact of increasing lung screening eligibility by relaxing the maximum years-since-quit threshold: a simulation modeling study. Cancer 2024; 130 (02) 244-255
- 29 Horinouchi H, Kusumoto M, Yatabe Y, Aokage K, Watanabe SI, Ishikura S. Lung cancer in Japan. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 17 (03) 353-361
- 30 Poon C, Wilsdon T, Sarwar I, Roediger A, Yuan M. Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption. Front Public Health 2023; 11: 1264342
- 31 Henderson LM, Su I-H, Rivera MP. et al. Prevalence of lung cancer screening in the US, 2022. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (03) e243190
- 32 Lung Cancer Policy Network. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.lungcancerpolicynetwork.com/
- 33 Kauczor HU, von Stackelberg O, Nischwitz E. et al; and SOLACE Consortium. Strengthening lung cancer screening in Europe: fostering participation, improving outcomes, and addressing health inequalities through collaborative initiatives in the SOLACE consortium. Insights Imaging 2024; 15 (01) 252
- 34 O'Dowd EL, Lee RW, Akram AR. et al. Defining the road map to a UK national lung cancer screening programme. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24 (05) e207-e218
- 35 Cancer Research UK. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-screening/lung-cancer-screening
- 36 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/nlcsp
- 37 Senior K. G7 Cancer: the priorities and challenges ahead. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24 (06) e240
- 38 Kazerooni EA, Wood DE, Rosenthal LS, Smith RA. The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: introduction. Cancer 2024; 130 (23) 3948-3960
- 39 Katki HA, Cheung LC, Landy R. Basing eligibility for lung cancer screening on individualized risk calculators should save more lives, but life expectancy matters. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112 (05) 429-430
- 40 Faselis C, Nations JA, Morgan CJ. et al. Assessment of lung cancer risk among smokers for whom annual screening is not recommended. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8 (10) 1428-1437
- 41 Yang P-C, Chen TH-H, Huang K-P, Lin L-J, Wu C-C. Taiwan national lung cancer early detection program for heavy smokers and non-smokers with family history of lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42 (16, suppl): 8009
- 42 Xia C, Basu P, Kramer BS. et al. Cancer screening in China: a steep road from evidence to implementation. Lancet Public Health 2023; 8 (12) e996-e1005
- 43 Manxhuka B, Hofmarcher T. Cancer Dashboard for Poland - Lung Cancer. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://onkologia.org.pl/sites/default/files/publications/2024-09/ihe_-_lung_cancer_dashboard_poland.pdf
- 44 Toumazis I, Bastani M, Han SS, Plevritis SK. Risk-based lung cancer screening: a systematic review. Lung Cancer 2020; 147: 154-186
- 45 Susai CJ, Velotta JB, Sakoda LC. Clinical adjuncts to lung cancer screening: a narrative review. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33 (04) 421-432
- 46 Bach PB, Kattan MW, Thornquist MD. et al. Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95 (06) 470-478
- 47 Tammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG. et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (08) 728-736
- 48 Cassidy A, Myles JP, van Tongeren M. et al. The LLP risk model: an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2008; 98 (02) 270-276
- 49 Field JK, Vulkan D, Davies MPA, Duffy SW, Gabe R. Liverpool lung project lung cancer risk stratification model: calibration and prospective validation. Thorax 2021; 76 (02) 161-168
- 50 Katki HA, Kovalchik SA, Berg CD, Cheung LC, Chaturvedi AK. Development and validation of risk models to select ever-smokers for CT lung cancer screening. JAMA 2016; 315 (21) 2300-2311
- 51 Ten Haaf K, Bastani M, Cao P. et al. A comparative modeling analysis of risk-based lung cancer screening strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112 (05) 466-479
- 52 Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL. et al. Addressing sex disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 criteria. Chest 2022; 161 (01) 248-256
- 53 Pasquinelli MM, Tammemägi MC, Kovitz KL. et al. Brief report: risk prediction model versus United States Preventive Services Task Force 2020 draft lung cancer screening eligibility criteria-reducing race disparities. JTO Clin Res Rep 2020; 2 (03) 100137
- 54 Choi E, Ding VY, Luo SJ. et al. Risk model-based lung cancer screening and racial and ethnic disparities in the US. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9 (12) 1640-1648
- 55 Cheung LC, Berg CD, Castle PE, Katki HA, Chaturvedi AK. Life-gained-based versus risk-based selection of smokers for lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171 (09) 623-632
- 56 Kumar V, Cohen JT, van Klaveren D. et al. Risk-targeted lung cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (03) 161-169
- 57 Landy R, Cheung LC, Berg CD, Chaturvedi AK, Robbins HA, Katki HA. Contemporary implications of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and risk-based guidelines for lung cancer screening eligibility in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171 (05) 384-386
- 58 Caverly TJ, Hayward RA, Meza R. Identifying patients for whom lung cancer screening is preference-sensitive. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (11) 823
- 59 Toumazis I, Alagoz O, Leung A, Plevritis SK. A risk-based framework for assessing real-time lung cancer screening eligibility that incorporates life expectancy and past screening findings. Cancer 2021; 127 (23) 4432-4446
- 60 Toumazis I, Cao P, de Nijs K. et al. Risk model-based lung cancer screening : a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176 (03) 320-332
- 61 Horst C, Dickson JL, Tisi S. et al. Delivering low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: a pragmatic approach. Thorax 2020; 75 (10) 831-832
- 62 Bhamani A, Creamer A, Verghese P. et al; SUMMIT consortium. Low-dose CT for lung cancer screening in a high-risk population (SUMMIT): a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2025; 26 (05) 609-619
- 63 Crosbie PA, Balata H, Evison M. et al. Second round results from the Manchester ‘lung health check’ community-based targeted lung cancer screening pilot. Thorax 2019; 74 (07) 700-704
- 64 Crosbie PA, Balata H, Evison M. et al. Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based ‘lung health check’ pilot in deprived areas of Manchester. Thorax 2019; 74 (04) 405-409
- 65 Goodley P, Balata H, Robbins HA, Booton R, Sperrin M, Crosbie PAJ. Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester lung health check cohort. BMJ Oncol 2024; 3 (01) e000560
- 66 Crosbie PA, Gabe R, Simmonds I. et al. Yorkshire lung screening trial (YLST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate invitation to community-based low-dose CT screening for lung cancer versus usual care in a targeted population at risk. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (09) e037075
- 67 Gabe R, Crosbie PAJ, Vulkan D. et al. Prospective evaluation of lung cancer screening eligibility criteria and lung cancer detection in the Yorkshire lung screening trial. J Thorac Oncol 2025; 20 (04) 425-436
- 68 Crosbie PAJ, Gabe R, Simmonds I. et al. Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial. Eur Respir J 2022; 60 (05) 2200483
- 69 Lim KP, Marshall H, Tammemägi M. et al; ILST (International Lung Screening Trial) Investigator Consortium. Protocol and rationale for the international lung screening trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 17 (04) 503-512
- 70 Tammemägi MC, Ruparel M, Tremblay A. et al. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (international lung screening trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23 (01) 138-148
- 71 Cressman S, Weber MF, Ngo PJ. et al. Economic impact of using risk models for eligibility selection to the International Lung Screening Trial. Lung Cancer 2023; 176: 38-45
- 72 van der Aalst C, Vonder M, Hubert J. et al. P1.14–04 European lung cancer screening implementation: 4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN trial. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18 (11) S217
- 73 Kim RY, Rendle KA, Mitra N. et al. Racial disparities in adherence to annual lung cancer screening and recommended follow-up care: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (09) 1561-1569
- 74 Sakoda LC, Rivera MP, Zhang J. et al. Patterns and factors associated with adherence to lung cancer screening in diverse practice settings. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (04) e218559
- 75 Smith HB, Ward R, Frazier C, Angotti J, Tanner NT. Guideline-recommended lung cancer screening adherence is superior with a centralized approach. Chest 2022; 161 (03) 818-825
- 76 Núñez ER, Slatore CG, Tanner NT. et al. National survey of lung cancer screening practices in Veterans Health Administration facilities. Am J Prev Med 2023; 65 (05) 901-905
- 77 Núñez ER, Triplette M. Addressing lung cancer screening disparities: what does it mean to be centralized?. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (09) 1457-1458
- 78 Martin JF, Kane GC, Shusted CS, Barta JA. Implementation of high-quality lung cancer screening: impact of centralized vs. decentralized processes. Popul Health Manag 2024; 27 (04) 291-293
- 79 Bhalla S, Natchimuthu V, Lee JL. et al. Effect of patient navigation on completion of lung cancer screening in vulnerable populations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22 (03) 151-157
- 80 Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM, Rigotti NA. et al. Patient navigation for lung cancer screening among current smokers in community health centers a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med 2018; 7 (03) 894-902
- 81 Shusted CS, Barta JA, Lake M. et al. The case for patient navigation in lung cancer screening in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. Popul Health Manag 2019; 22 (04) 347-361
- 82 Wiener RS, Barker AM, Carter-Harris L. et al. Stakeholder research priorities to promote implementation of shared decision-making for lung cancer screening: an American Thoracic Society and Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 205 (06) 619-630
- 83 Abubaker-Sharif M, Shusted C, Myers P, Myers R. Primary care physician perceptions of shared decision making in lung cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 2022; 37 (04) 1099-1107
- 84 Eberth JM, McDonnell KK, Sercy E. et al. A national survey of primary care physicians: perceptions and practices of low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Prev Med Rep 2018; 11: 93-99
- 85 Melzer AC, Golden SE, Ono SS, Datta S, Crothers K, Slatore CG. What exactly is shared decision-making? A qualitative study of shared decision-making in lung cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35 (02) 546-553
- 86 Brenner AT, Malo TL, Margolis M. et al. Evaluating shared decision making for lung cancer screening. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178 (10) 1311-1316
- 87 Fukunaga MI, Halligan K, Kodela J. et al. Tools to promote shared decision-making in lung cancer screening using low-dose CT scanning: a systematic review. Chest 2020; 158 (06) 2646-2657
- 88 Tan NQP, Nishi SPE, Lowenstein LM. et al. Impact of the shared decision-making process on lung cancer screening decisions. Cancer Med 2022; 11 (03) 790-797
- 89 Studts JL, Hirsch EA, Silvestri GA. Shared decision-making during a lung cancer screening visit: is it a barrier or does it bring value?. Chest 2023; 163 (01) 251-254
- 90 Walsh JME, Karliner L, Smith A. et al. LungCare: encouraging shared decision-making in lung cancer screening-a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38 (14) 3115-3122
- 91 Schapira MM, Hubbard RA, Whittle J. et al. Lung cancer screening decision aid designed for a primary care setting: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (08) e2330452
- 92 Caverly TJ, Wiener RS, Kumbier K, Lowery J, Fagerlin A. Prediction-augmented shared decision-making and lung cancer screening uptake. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (07) e2419624
- 93 Murphy NR, Crothers K, Snidarich M. et al. The use of a tailored decision aid to improve understanding of lung cancer screening in people with HIV. Chest 2025; 167 (01) 259-269
- 94 Hoffman RM, Reuland DS, Volk RJ. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Requirement for shared decision-making for lung cancer screening. JAMA 2021; 325 (10) 933-934
- 95 Tan NQP, Lowenstein LM, Douglas EE. et al. The telehealth shared decision-making coaching and navigation in primary care (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators. BMC Prim Care 2024; 25 (01) 373
- 96 Lowenstein LM, Shih YT, Minnix J. et al. A protocol for a cluster randomized trial of care delivery models to improve the quality of smoking cessation and shared decision making for lung cancer screening. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 128: 107141
- 97 Khanna A, Fix GM, McCullough MB. et al. Implementing shared decision-making for lung cancer screening across a Veterans Health Administration Hospital Network: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (03) 476-483
- 98 Skurla SE, Leishman NJ, Fagerlin A, Wiener RS, Lowery J, Caverly TJ. Clinician perceptions on using decision tools to support prediction-based shared decision making for lung cancer screening. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9 (01) 23 814683241252786
- 99 Volk RJ, Myers RE, Arenberg D. et al. The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: current challenges and future directions for shared decision making for lung cancer screening. Cancer 2024; 130 (23) 3996-4011
- 100 Mazzone P, Powell CA, Arenberg D. et al. Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Chest 2015; 147 (02) 295-303
- 101 Bandi P, Star J, Ashad-Bishop K, Kratzer T, Smith R, Jemal A. Lung cancer screening in the US, 2022. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184 (08) 882-891
- 102 Taylor KL, Cox LS, Zincke N, Mehta L, McGuire C, Gelmann E. Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer 2007; 56 (01) 125-134
- 103 Williams RM, Cordon M, Eyestone E. et al; Lung Screening, Tobacco, Health Trial. Improved motivation and readiness to quit shortly after lung cancer screening: evidence for a teachable moment. Cancer 2022; 128 (10) 1976-1986
- 104 Balata H, Traverse-Healy L, Blandin-Knight S. et al. Attending community-based lung cancer screening influences smoking behaviour in deprived populations. Lung Cancer 2020; 139: 41-46
- 105 Tanner NT, Thomas NA, Ward R. et al. Association of cigarette type and nicotine dependence in patients presenting for lung cancer Screening. Chest 2020; 158 (05) 2184-2191
- 106 Thomas NA, Ward R, Tanner NT. et al. Factors associated with smoking cessation attempts in lung cancer screening: a secondary analysis of the national lung screening trial. Chest 2023; 163 (02) 433-443
- 107 Williams RM, Eyestone E, Smith L. et al; On Behalf Of The Lung Screening Tobacco Health Trial. Engaging patients in smoking cessation treatment within the lung cancer screening setting: lessons learned from an NCI SCALE Trial. Curr Oncol 2022; 29 (04) 2211-2224
- 108 Bhamani A, Katsampouris E, Bojang F. et al; SUMMIT Consortium. Uptake and 4-week outcomes of an ‘opt-out’ smoking cessation referral strategy in a London-based lung cancer screening setting. BMJ Open Respir Res 2025; 12 (01) e002337
- 109 Shusted CS, Mukhtar S, Lee J. et al. Factors associated with receipt of tobacco treatment integrated with nurse navigation in a centralized lung cancer screening program at an urban academic medical center. Cancer Control 2024; 31: 10 732748241304966
- 110 Cao P, Jeon J, Levy DT. et al. Potential impact of cessation interventions at the point of lung cancer screening on lung cancer and overall mortality in the United States. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15 (07) 1160-1169
- 111 Cao P, Smith L, Mandelblatt JS. et al. Cost-effectiveness of a telephone-based smoking cessation randomized trial in the lung cancer screening setting. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6 (04) pkac048
- 112 Cadham CJ, Cao P, Jayasekera J. et al; CISNET-SCALE Collaboration. Cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in the lung cancer screening setting: a simulation study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113 (08) 1065-1073
- 113 Evans WK, Gauvreau CL, Flanagan WM. et al. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening: a microsimulation model. CMAJ Open 2020; 8 (03) E585-E592
- 114 Fucito LM, Czabafy S, Hendricks PS, Kotsen C, Richardson D, Toll BA. Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Synergy Committee. Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: a clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Cancer 2016; 122 (08) 1150-1159
- 115 Rojewski AM, Bailey SR, Bernstein SL. et al. Considering systemic barriers to treating tobacco use in clinical settings in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 2019; 21 (11) 1453-1461
- 116 Roughgarden KL, Toll BA, Tanner NT, Frazier CC, Silvestri GA, Rojewski AM. Tobacco treatment specialist training for lung cancer screening providers. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61 (05) 765-768
- 117 Rendle KA, Burnett-Hartman AN, Neslund-Dudas C. et al. Evaluating lung cancer screening across diverse healthcare systems: a process model from the lung PROSPR consortium. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 13 (02) 129-136
- 118 Lang AE. Update on the National Cancer Institute's smoking cessation at lung examination collaboration trials. Chest 2024; 165 (06) 1302-1306
- 119 Meza R, Jeon J, Jimenez-Mendoza E. et al. National cancer institute smoking cessation at lung examination trials brief report: baseline characteristics and comparison with the U.S. general population of lung cancer screening-eligible patients. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3 (07) 100352
- 120 Taylor KL, Williams RM, Li T. et al; Georgetown Lung Screening, Tobacco, and Health Trial. A randomized trial of telephone-based smoking cessation treatment in the lung cancer screening setting. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114 (10) 1410-1419
- 121 Foley KL, Dressler EV, Weaver KE. et al; Optimizing Lung Screening Trial Writing Team. The optimizing lung screening trial (WF-20817CD): multicenter randomized effectiveness implementation trial to increase tobacco use cessation for individuals undergoing lung screening. Chest 2023; 164 (02) 531-543
- 122 Fu SS, Rothman AJ, Vock DM. et al. Optimizing longitudinal tobacco cessation treatment in lung cancer screening: a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (08) e2329903
- 123 Cartmel B, Fucito LM, Bold KW. et al. Effect of a personalized tobacco treatment intervention on smoking abstinence in individuals eligible for lung cancer screening. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19 (04) 643-649
- 124 Park ER, Haas JS, Rigotti NA. et al. Integrating tobacco treatment into lung cancer screening: the screen assist factorial randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2025; 185 (05) 531-539
- 125 Park ER, Neil JM, Noonan E. et al. Leveraging the clinical timepoints in lung cancer screening to engage individuals in tobacco treatment. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6 (06) pkac073
- 126 Cinciripini PM, Minnix JA, Kypriotakis G. et al. Smoking cessation interventions in the lung cancer screening setting: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2025; 185 (03) 284-291
- 127 Buttery SC, Williams P, Mweseli R. et al. Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9 (01) e001030
- 128 Williams PJ, Philip KE, Alghamdi SM. et al. Strategies to deliver smoking cessation interventions during targeted lung health screening - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chron Respir Dis 2023; 20: 14 799731231183446
- 129 2022 BRFSS Questionnaire. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2022-BRFSS-Questionnaire-508.pdf
- 130 National Health Interview Survey. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fnchs%2Fnhis%2Findex.htm
- 131 Health Information National Trends Survey. Accessed September 18, 2025 at: https://hints.cancer.gov/Default.aspx
- 132 Rai A, Doria-Rose VP, Silvestri GA, Yabroff KR. Evaluating lung cancer screening uptake, outcomes, and costs in the United States: challenges with existing data and recommendations for improvement. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111 (04) 342-349
- 133 Sarkar S, Choa E, Manzo LL. et al. Predictors and uptake of lung cancer screening in the US: an integrative literature review. Lung Cancer 2025; 203: 108529
- 134 Núñez ER, Ito Fukunaga M, Stevens GA. et al. Review of interventions that improve uptake of lung cancer screening: a cataloging of strategies that have been shown to work (or not). Chest 2024; 166 (03) 632-648
- 135 Elston Lafata J, Rendle KA, Wainwright JV. et al. Characterizing the design of and emerging evidence for health care organization-based lung cancer screening interventions: a systematic review. MDM Policy Pract 2025; 10 (01) 23 814683251328375
- 136 Christensen J, Prosper AE, Wu CC. et al. ACR lung-RADS v2022: assessment categories and management recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21 (03) 473-488
- 137 Sakoda LC, Henderson LM, Rivera MP. Adherence to lung cancer screening: what exactly are we talking about?. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18 (12) 1951-1952
- 138 Alshora S, McKee BJ, Regis SM. et al. Adherence to radiology recommendations in a clinical CT lung screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (02) 282-286
- 139 Erkmen CP, Dako F, Moore R. et al. Adherence to annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan in a diverse population. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32 (03) 291-298
- 140 Kim RY, Rendle KA, Mitra N. et al. Adherence to annual lung cancer screening and rates of cancer diagnosis. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8 (03) e250942
- 141 Lake M, Shusted CS, Juon HS. et al. Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up. BMC Cancer 2020; 20 (01) 561
- 142 Lin Y, Fu M, Ding R. et al. Patient adherence to lung CT screening reporting & data system-recommended screening intervals in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 17 (01) 38-55
- 143 Lopez-Olivo MA, Maki KG, Choi NJ. et al. Patient adherence to screening for lung cancer in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (11) e2025102
- 144 Spalluto LB, Lewis JA, LaBaze S. et al. Association of a lung screening program coordinator with adherence to annual CT lung screening at a large academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (02) 208-215
- 145 Triplette M, Wenger DS, Shahrir S. et al. Patient identification of lung cancer screening follow-up recommendations and the association with adherence. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (05) 799-806
- 146 Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W. et al. Performance of lung-RADS in the national lung screening trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162 (07) 485-491
- 147 Tailor TD, Gutman R, An N. et al. Positive screens are more likely in a national lung cancer screening registry than the national lung screening trial. J Am Coll Radiol 2025; 22 (06) 644-652
- 148 Henderson LM, Bacchus L, Benefield T, Huamani Velasquez R, Rivera MP. Rates of positive lung cancer screening examinations in academic versus community practice. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9 (04) 1528-1532
- 149 Burnett-Hartman AN, Carroll NM, Honda SA. et al. Community-based lung cancer screening results in relation to patient and radiologist characteristics: the PROSPR consortium. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19 (03) 433-441
- 150 Jacobs CD, Jafari ME. Early results of lung cancer screening and radiation dose assessment by low-dose CT at a community hospital. Clin Lung Cancer 2017; 18 (05) e327-e331
- 151 McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB, Flacke S, Wald C. Performance of ACR lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12 (03) 273-276
- 152 Rendle KA, Saia CA, Vachani A. et al. Rates of downstream procedures and complications associated with lung cancer screening in routine clinical practice : a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177 (01) 18-28
- 153 Rivera MP, Durham DD, Long JM. et al. Receipt of recommended follow-up care after a positive lung cancer screening examination. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (11) e2240403
- 154 Ahmed A, Hippe DS, Snidarich M, Crothers K, Triplette M. Delays in recommended follow-up after positive findings in lung cancer screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20 (08) 1175-1181
- 155 Mendoza DP, Petranovic M, Som A. et al. Lung-RADS category 3 and 4 nodules on lung cancer screening in clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219 (01) 55-65
- 156 Silvestri GA, Goldman L, Tanner NT. et al. Outcomes from more than 1 million people screened for lung cancer with low-dose CT imaging. Chest 2023; 164 (01) 241-251
- 157 Zhang EW, Shepard JO, Kuo A. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of lung cancers detected on low-dose lung cancer screening CT. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30 (08) 1472-1479
- 158 Lin Y, Tabatabaei SMH, Ding R. et al. Analyzing patient characteristics and lung cancer outcomes pre and post the 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines: experience from a large academic institution. J Thorac Imaging 2025; (e-pub ahead of print)
- 159 Lafata KJ, Read C, Tong BC. et al. Lung cancer screening in clinical practice: a 5-year review of frequency and predictors of lung cancer in the screened population. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21 (05) 767-777
- 160 Dyer DS, White C, Conley Thomson C. et al. A quick reference guide for incidental findings on lung cancer screening CT examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20 (02) 162-172
- 161 Gareen IF, Gutman R, Sicks J. et al. Significant incidental findings in the national lung screening trial. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183 (07) 677-684
- 162 Bonney A, Pascoe DM, McCusker MW. et al. Incidental findings during lung low-dose computed tomography cancer screening in Australia and Canada, 2016-21: a prospective observational study. Med J Aust 2025; 222 (08) 403-411
- 163 Rampinelli C, Preda L, Maniglio M. et al. Extrapulmonary malignancies detected at lung cancer screening. Radiology 2011; 261 (01) 293-299
- 164 van de Wiel JC, Wang Y, Xu DM. et al; NELSON study group. Neglectable benefit of searching for incidental findings in the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (NELSON) using low-dose multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (06) 1474-1482
- 165 Henderson LM, Kim RY, Tanner NT. et al. Lung cancer screening and incidental findings: a research agenda: an official American Thoracic Society research statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025; 211 (03) 436-451
- 166 Kinsinger LS, Anderson C, Kim J. et al. Implementation of lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (03) 399-406
- 167 Morgan L, Choi H, Reid M, Khawaja A, Mazzone PJ. Frequency of incidental findings and subsequent evaluation in low-dose computed tomographic scans for lung cancer screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14 (09) 1450-1456
- 168 Reiter MJ, Nemesure A, Madu E, Reagan L, Plank A. Frequency and distribution of incidental findings deemed appropriate for S modifier designation on low-dose CT in a lung cancer screening program. Lung Cancer 2018; 120: 1-6
- 169 Janssen K, Schertz K, Rubin N, Begnaud A. Incidental findings in a decentralized lung cancer screening program. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019; 16 (09) 1198-1201
- 170 Henderson LM, Chiles C, Perera P. et al. Variability in reporting of incidental findings detected on lung cancer screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20 (04) 617-620
- 171 Melzer AC, Atoma B, Fabbrini AE, Campbell M, Clothier BA, Fu SS. Variation in reporting of incidental findings on initial lung cancer screening and associations with clinician assessment. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21 (01) 118-127
- 172 Al-Antary N, Hirko KA, Cassidy-Bushrow AE. et al. Coronary artery calcification identified on lung cancer screening CT Scans: a scoping review. Chest 2025; 168 (03) 719-736
- 173 Rivera MP, Katki HA, Tanner NT. et al. Addressing disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility and healthcare access. An official American Thoracic Society statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202 (07) e95-e112
- 174 Tailor TD, Choudhury KR, Tong BC, Christensen JD, Sosa JA, Rubin GD. Geographic access to CT for lung cancer screening: a census tract-level analysis of cigarette smoking in the United States and driving distance to a CT facility. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16 (01) 15-23
- 175 Simkin J, Khoo E, Darvishian M. et al. Addressing inequity in spatial access to lung cancer screening. Curr Oncol 2023; 30 (09) 8078-8091
- 176 Sahar L, Douangchai Wills VL, Liu KK, Kazerooni EA, Dyer DS, Smith RA. Using geospatial analysis to evaluate access to lung cancer screening in the United States. Chest 2021; 159 (02) 833-844
- 177 Sahar L, Douangchai Wills VL, Liu KKA. et al. Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States. Cancer 2022; 128 (08) 1584-1594
- 178 Welch AC, Gorden JA, Mooney SJ, Wilshire CL, Zeliadt SB. Understanding Washington State's low uptake of lung cancer screening in two steps: a geospatial analysis of patient travel time and health care availability of imaging sites. Chest 2024; 166 (03) 622-631
- 179 Tailor TD, Tong BC, Gao J, Choudhury KR, Rubin GD. A geospatial analysis of factors affecting access to CT facilities: implications for lung cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16 (12) 1663-1668
- 180 Peña MA, Sudarshan A, Muns CM. et al. Analysis of geographic accessibility of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer screening centers among American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20 (07) 642-651
- 181 Lozier JW, Fedewa SA, Smith RA, Silvestri GA. Lung cancer screening eligibility and screening patterns among Black and White adults in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (10) e2130350
- 182 Sun J, Perraillon MC, Myerson R. The impact of medicare health insurance coverage on lung cancer screening. Med Care 2022; 60 (01) 29-36
- 183 Tailor TD, Bell S, Doo FX, Carlos RC. Repeat annual lung cancer screening after baseline screening among screen-negative individuals: no-cost coverage is not enough. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20 (01) 29-36
- 184 Korn AR, Walsh-Bailey C, Correa-Mendez M. et al. Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: a systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73 (05) 461-479
- 185 Studts JL, Carter-Bawa L, Feldman J. et al. Embracing compassion for people facing lung cancer-the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable. Ann Intern Med 2025; 178 (07) 1027-1028
- 186 Wilder FG, Cangut B, Jindani R, Abioye O, Florez N. Lung cancer screening among minority groups: identifying gaps in screening and opportunities for intervention. JTCVS Open 2024; 21: 341-348
- 187 Resong PJ, Niu J, Duhon GF. et al. Acceptability of personalized lung cancer screening program among primary care providers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2024; 17 (02) 51-57
- 188 Ten Haaf K, van der Aalst CM, de Koning HJ, Kaaks R, Tammemägi MC. Personalising lung cancer screening: an overview of risk-stratification opportunities and challenges. Int J Cancer 2021; 149 (02) 250-263
- 189 Tammemägi MC, Church TR, Hocking WG. et al. Evaluation of the lung cancer risks at which to screen ever- and never-smokers: screening rules applied to the PLCO and NLST cohorts. PLoS Med 2014; 11 (12) e1001764
- 190 Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemägi MC. et al. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: a retrospective validation study. PLoS Med 2017; 14 (04) e1002277
- 191 Kim YW, Lee CT. Advancing the implementation of risk model-based lung cancer screening. J Thorac Oncol 2025; 20 (04) 419-421
- 192 Yang JJ, Wen W, Zahed H. et al. Lung cancer risk prediction models for Asian ever-smokers. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19 (03) 451-464
- 193 Lam DC, Liam CK, Andarini S. et al. Lung cancer screening in Asia: an expert consensus report. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18 (10) 1303-1322
- 194 Boyle P, Chapman CJ, Holdenrieder S. et al. Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 (02) 383-389
- 195 Chapman CJ, Healey GF, Murray A. et al. EarlyCDT-lung test: improved clinical utility through additional autoantibody assays. Tumour Biol 2012; 33 (05) 1319-1326
- 196 Duarte A, Corbett M, Melton H. et al. EarlyCDT lung blood test for risk classification of solid pulmonary nodules: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26 (49) 1-184
- 197 Macdonald IK, Murray A, Healey GF. et al. Application of a high throughput method of biomarker discovery to improvement of the EarlyCDT-lung test. PLoS One 2012; 7 (12) e51002
- 198 Massion PP, Healey GF, Peek LJ. et al. Autoantibody signature enhances the positive predictive power of computed tomography and nodule-based risk models for detection of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12 (03) 578-584
- 199 Sullivan FM, Mair FS, Anderson W. et al; Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Scotland (ECLS) Team. Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in a randomised trial of an autoantibody blood test followed by imaging. Eur Respir J 2021; 57 (01) 2000670
- 200 Sullivan FM, Mair FS, Anderson W. et al. Five year mortality in an RCT of a lung cancer biomarker to select people for low dose CT screening. PLoS One 2025; 20 (01) e0306163
- 201 Silvestri GA, Tanner NT, Kearney P. et al; PANOPTIC Trial Team. Assessment of plasma proteomics biomarker's ability to distinguish benign from malignant lung nodules: results of the PANOPTIC (pulmonary nodule plasma proteomic classifier) trial. Chest 2018; 154 (03) 491-500
- 202 Guida F, Sun N, Bantis LE. et al; Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Consortium for Early Detection of Lung Cancer. Assessment of lung cancer risk on the basis of a biomarker panel of circulating proteins. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4 (10) e182078
- 203 Fahrmann JF, Marsh T, Irajizad E. et al. Blood-based biomarker panel for personalized lung cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (08) 876-883
- 204 Sozzi G, Boeri M, Rossi M. et al. Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (08) 768-773
- 205 Montani F, Marzi MJ, Dezi F. et al. miR-Test: a blood test for lung cancer early detection. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107 (06) djv063
- 206 Pastorino U, Boeri M, Sestini S. et al. Baseline computed tomography screening and blood microRNA predict lung cancer risk and define adequate intervals in the BioMILD trial. Ann Oncol 2022; 33 (04) 395-405
- 207 Lampignano R, Kloten V, Krahn T, Schlange T. Integrating circulating miRNA analysis in the clinical management of lung cancer: present or future?. Mol Aspects Med 2020; 72: 100844
- 208 Yu H, Raut JR, Bhardwaj M. et al. A serum microRNA signature for enhanced selection of people for lung cancer screening. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2022; 42 (11) 1222-1225
- 209 Tao R, Wang D, Pei W. et al. Highly sensitive and specific panels of plasma exosomal microRNAs for identification of malignant pulmonary nodules. Clin Respir J 2024; 18 (11) e70034
- 210 Liu MC, Oxnard GR, Klein EA, Swanton C, Seiden MV. CCGA Consortium. Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA. Ann Oncol 2020; 31 (06) 745-759
- 211 Jacobsen KK, Schnohr P, Jensen GB, Bojesen SE. AHRR (cg05575921) methylation safely improves specificity of lung cancer screening eligibility criteria: a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31 (04) 758-765
- 212 Cristiano S, Leal A, Phallen J. et al. Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer. Nature 2019; 570 (7761): 385-389
- 213 Bhalla S, Yi S, Gerber DE. Emerging strategies in lung cancer screening: blood and beyond. Clin Chem 2024; 70 (01) 60-67
- 214 van den Broek D, Groen HJM. Screening approaches for lung cancer by blood-based biomarkers: challenges and opportunities. Tumour Biol 2024; 46 (s1): S65-S80
- 215 Cheo HM, Ong CYG, Ting Y. A systematic review of AI performance in lung cancer detection on CT thorax. Healthcare (Basel) 2025; 13 (13) 1510
- 216 Lee M, Hwang EJ, Lee JH. et al. Artificial intelligence for low-dose CT lung cancer screening: comparison of utilization scenarios. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2025; 225 (01) e2532829
- 217 Walstra ANH, Lancaster HL, Heuvelmans MA. et al. Feasibility of AI as first reader in the 4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN lung cancer screening trial: impact on negative-misclassifications and clinical referral rate. Eur J Cancer 2025; 216: 115214
- 218 Lancaster HL, Jiang B, Davies MPA. et al. Histological proven AI performance in the UKLS CT lung cancer screening study: potential for workload reduction. Eur J Cancer 2025; 220: 115324
- 219 Leonard S, Patel MA, Zhou Z, Le H, Mondal P, Adams SJ. Comparing artificial intelligence and traditional regression models in lung cancer risk prediction using a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2025; 22 (06) 675-690
- 220 Ardila D, Kiraly AP, Bharadwaj S. et al. End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med 2019; 25 (06) 954-961
- 221 Mikhael PG, Wohlwend J, Yala A. et al. Sybil: a validated deep learning model to predict future lung cancer risk from a single low-dose chest computed tomography. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41 (12) 2191-2200
- 222 Adams SJ, Mikhael P, Wohlwend J, Barzilay R, Sequist LV, Fintelmann FJ. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung cancer screening. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33 (04) 401-409
- 223 Quanyang W, Yao H, Sicong W. et al. Artificial intelligence in lung cancer screening: detection, classification, prediction, and prognosis. Cancer Med 2024; 13 (07) e7140