Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2695-1978
Innovations and brief communications

Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy

1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, Rome, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN638740)
,
Federico Desideri
2   Department of Gastroenterology, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
,
Sara Schiavone
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, Rome, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN638740)
,
Nicolò Bevilacqua
2   Department of Gastroenterology, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
,
Andrea Dequarti
2   Department of Gastroenterology, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
,
Rosanna Sossi
3   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale di Anzio, Anzio, Italy
,
Piercarlo Farris
2   Department of Gastroenterology, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
,
Federico Iacopini
4   Ospedale S. Giuseppe, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Albano L.; Rome, Italy
,
5   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN437807)
6   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT06073405, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: prospective, multicenter study
Preview

BACKGROUND Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy is crucial for clinical decision-making, follow-up, and cost-saving strategies. Objective sizing methods are lacking, and interobserver variability is high. This prospective, multicenter, study evaluated the accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for polyp size estimation. METHODS Subjects aged ≥18 undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening or surveillance were enrolled across three centers. Polyp size was initially assessed by operators using forceps/snare comparison (ground truth). Procedures were recorded, and AI-based polyp size estimates were obtained offline. The primary endpoint was AI accuracy in size class determination (diminutive ≤5 mm, small 6–9 mm, large ≥10 mm). Secondary endpoints included size estimation in mm and its impact on clinical management strategies. RESULTS Among 465 polyps (307 diminutive, 107 small, 51 large) from 225 patients (51.6% female, mean age 61.9 ± 10.4 years), AI accuracy for size class determination was 85.8% [95%CI: 82.6–88.8]. Accuracy for diminutive, small, and large polyps was 93.3%, 74.6%, and 55.1%, respectively. The AI tool assigned 90.8% of patients to correct surveillance intervals and achieved a MAE of 1.13 mm and RMSE of 1.40 mm for polyps ≤10 mm. CONCLUSIONS The AI model performs similarly to expert endoscopist in clinically relevant size-related endpoints, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of colorectal cancer screening.



Publication History

Received: 03 May 2025

Accepted after revision: 29 August 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
03 September 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany