J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2687-0207
Original Article

Surgeon Experience and Outcomes in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A 10-Year Single Surgeon Analysis

Evan Rothchild
1   Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN2013)
,
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health, Great Neck, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN5799)
,
Stephen O. Popoola
3   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN232890)
,
Joseph Ricci
3   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN232890)
,
Neil Tanna
3   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN232890)
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Background: Microsurgical breast reconstruction with DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator) flaps has become increasingly popular. While surgeons undergo rigorous training, it is believed that plastic surgeons continue to refine and enhance their performance through independent practice. This study evaluates the effect of surgeon experience on clinical outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive DIEP flap procedures performed by a single surgeon from fellowship completion in 2013 to ten years of independent professional practice in 2023. Patients were categorized into "early" and "late" groups, separated by a midpoint surgery date (July 30, 2018). Statistical analyses included Student's t-tests, chi-squared analysis with Fisher's exact test, and multivariable regressions controlling for comorbidities. Results: The study included a total of 1,182 DIEP flaps in 632 patients, with 238 in the early group and 394 in the late group. The late group had a lower mean body mass index (BMI) (28.83 vs. 29.98, p=0.004), prevalence of hypertension (26.6% vs. 35.3%, p=0.021), and prevalence of diabetes (7.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.010) than the early group. After controlling for potential confounders, the late group was independently associated with decreased length of stay (IRR=0.611, p<0.001) and fewer revision surgeries (IRR=0.689, p<0.001). Conclusion: This large, single-surgeon series demonstrates that even with extensive initial training, plastic surgeons continue to evolve their surgical outcomes through accumulated experience. These findings emphasize the importance of consistent volume over time in achieving optimal results in microsurgical breast reconstruction.



Publication History

Received: 26 December 2024

Accepted after revision: 17 August 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 August 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor , NY 10001 New York, USA