Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2666-5719
First Clinical Experiences with Microfocused Ultrasound in Infraorbital Rejuvenation: A Clinically and Scientifically Grounded Perspective

Abstract
Objectives & Hypotheses
The infraorbital region is challenging to treat due to complex anatomy and issues like skin laxity, malar edema, and malar mounds. This study evaluates micro focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) as a non-invasive treatment for infraorbital rejuvenation, hypothesizing improved skin tightening and contouring.
Study Design
A case series with anatomical analysis and literature review.
Methods
Five female patients (aged 42–54) with mild-to-moderate skin laxity underwent MFU-V treatment using 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mm transducers. Standardized photos and assessment scales (Merz Infraorbital Hollow Scale, GAIS) were used at baseline and 6 months.
Results
MFU-V led to visible improvements in periorbital skin tightening and reduction of malar mounds, especially in more pronounced cases. No adverse effects occurred.
Conclusion
MFU-V is a safe, effective, and non-invasive option for periorbital rejuvenation. It may serve as an alternative to surgical treatment for infraorbital skin laxity and malar deformities. Larger studies are needed to confirm efficacy.
Ethical Approval
The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent
All patients provided written informed consent.
‡ These authors contributed equally to this article.
Publication History
Article published online:
05 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Kpodzo DS, Nahai F, McCord CD. Malar mounds and festoons: Review of current management. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (02) 235-248
- 2 Koza E, Ma MS, Ahmed A. et al. A comparison of 1550-nm fractional photothermolysis versus intense focused ultrasound for treatment of periorbital wrinkles: A randomized control trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90 (05) 1035-1037
- 3 Lee J-H, Hong G. Definitions of groove and hollowness of the infraorbital region and clinical treatment using soft-tissue filler. Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45 (03) 214-221
- 4 Roh MR, Chung KY. Infraorbital dark circles: Definition, causes, and treatment options. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (08) 1163-1171
- 5 Mojallal A, Cotofana S. Anatomy of lower eyelid and eyelid-cheek junction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2017; 62 (05) 365-374
- 6 van Loghem J, Sattler S, Casabona G. et al. Consensus on the use of hyaluronic acid fillers from the cohesive polydensified matrix range: Best practice in specific facial indications. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2021; 14: 1175-1199
- 7 Prasetyo AD, Prager W, Rubin MG, Moretti EA, Nikolis A. Hyaluronic acid fillers with cohesive polydensified matrix for soft-tissue augmentation and rejuvenation: A literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2016; 9: 257-280
- 8 de Maio M, DeBoulle K, Braz A, Rohrich RJ. Alliance for the Future of Aesthetics Consensus Committee. Facial assessment and injection guide for botulinum toxin and injectable hyaluronic acid fillers: Focus on the midface. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (04) 540e-550e
- 9 Phoebe LKW. The troublesome triad: Festoons, malar mounds, and palpebral bags. Journal of Cosmetic Medicine. 2017; 1 (01) 1-7
- 10 Goldberg RA, McCann JD, Fiaschetti D, Ben Simon GJ. What causes eyelid bags? Analysis of 114 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (05) 1395-1402 , discussion 1403–1404
- 11 Jaiswal S, Jawade S. Microneedling in dermatology: A comprehensive review of applications, techniques, and outcomes. Cureus 2024; 16 (09) e70033
- 12 Kumar S, Shukla R. Advancements in microneedle technology: Current status and next-generation innovations. J Microencapsul 2024; 41 (08) 782-803
- 13 Lee KWA, Chan KWL, Lee A. et al. Polynucleotides in aesthetic medicine: A review of current practices and perceived effectiveness. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25 (15) 8224
- 14 Rho NK, Kim HS, Kim SY, Lee W. Injectable “skin boosters” in aging skin rejuvenation: A current overview. Arch Plast Surg 2024; 51 (06) 528-541
- 15 Manole CG, Soare C, Ceafalan LC, Voiculescu VM. Platelet-rich plasma in dermatology: New insights on the cellular mechanism of skin repair and regeneration. Life (Basel) 2023; 14 (01) 40
- 16 Xiao H, Xu D, Mao R, Xiao M, Fang Y, Liu Y. Platelet-rich plasma in facial rejuvenation: A systematic appraisal of the available clinical evidence. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2021; 14: 1697-1724
- 17 West TB, Alster TS. Improvement of infraorbital hyperpigmentation following carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24 (06) 615-616
- 18 Baspeyras M, Rouvrais C, Liégard L. et al. Clinical and biometrological efficacy of a hyaluronic acid-based mesotherapy product: A randomised controlled study. Arch Dermatol Res 2013; 305 (08) 673-682
- 19 El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Moawad O. et al. Efficacy of mesotherapy in facial rejuvenation: A histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Int J Dermatol 2012; 51 (08) 913-919
- 20 Akbari F, Hadibarhaghtalab M, Parvar SY, Dehghani S, Namazi MR. Toward facial rejuvenation; a clinical trial to assess the efficacy of nano fat grafting on wrinkles. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024; 23 (02) 600-606
- 21 Vachiramon V, Pavicic T, Casabona G. et al. Microfocused ultrasound in regenerative aesthetics: A narrative review on mechanisms of action and clinical outcomes. J Cosmet Dermatol 2025; 24 (02) e16658
- 22 Fabi SG, Goldman MP. Retrospective evaluation of micro-focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening the face and neck. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (05) 569-575
- 23 Suh DH, So BJ, Lee SJ, Song KY, Ryu HJ. Intense focused ultrasound for facial tightening: histologic changes in 11 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015; 17 (04) 200-203
- 24 White WM, Makin IRS, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Gliklich RE. Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: A new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (01) 22-29
- 25 Pavicic T, Ballard JR, Bykovskaya T. et al. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization: Consensus on safety and review of energy-based devices. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022; 21 (02) 636-647
- 26 Barbarino SC. Combination approach to tear trough deformities and under eye appearance using microfocused ultrasound with visualization and hyaluronic acid filler. Am J Cosmet Surg 2021; 38 (03) 156-162
- 27 Pak CS, Lee YK, Jeong JH, Kim JH, Seo JD, Heo CY. Safety and efficacy of ulthera in the rejuvenation of aging lower eyelids: A pivotal clinical trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014; 38 (05) 861-868
- 28 Suh D-H, Oh Y-J, Lee S-J. et al. A intense-focused ultrasound tightening for the treatment of infraorbital laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2012; 14 (06) 290-295
- 29 Newberry CI, Mccrary H, Thomas JR, Cerrati EW. Updated management of malar edema, mounds, and festoons: A systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (03) 246-258
- 30 Funt DK. Avoiding malar edema during midface/cheek augmentation with dermal fillers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011; 4 (12) 32-36
- 31 Asaadi M. Etiology and treatment of congenital festoons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (04) 1024-1032
- 32 Pessa JE, Garza JR. The malar septum: The anatomic basis of malar mounds and malar edema. Aesthet Surg J 1997; 17 (01) 11-17
- 33 Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: A rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62 (02) 262-269
- 34 Bukhari A, Shadid A, Al-Omair A, Alheggi A, Almukhadeb EA, Albarqawi SY. Patient satisfaction following treatment with micro-focused ultrasound with visualization: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Skin Res Technol 2024; 30 (08) e13917
- 35 Chang YC, Croix J, Javvaji S, Hernandez S, Chapas AM, MacGregor J. Patient satisfaction and our clinical experience with 459 microfocused ultrasound treatments. Lasers Surg Med 2019; 51 (06) 495-499
- 36 Chaves Bellote TP, Miot HA. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization for face slimming: Preliminary results in four women. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2021; 14: 1613-1619
- 37 Friedman O, Isman G, Koren A, Shoshany H, Sprecher E, Artzi O. Intense focused ultrasound for neck and lower face skin tightening a prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19 (04) 850-854
- 38 Jung HJ, Min J, Seo HM, Kim WS. Comparison of effect between high intense focused ultrasound devices for facial tightening: Evaluator-blinded, split-face study. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2016; 18 (05) 252-256
- 39 Kerscher M, Nurrisyanti AT, Eiben-Nielson C, Hartmann S, Lambert-Baumann J. Skin physiology and safety of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for improving skin laxity. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2019; 12: 71-79
- 40 Lee HS, Jang WS, Cha YJ. et al. Multiple pass ultrasound tightening of skin laxity of the lower face and neck. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (01) 20-27
- 41 Lowe S. Single treatment, single depth superficial microfocused ultrasound with visualization for rhytid improvement. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (07) e3662
- 42 Montes JR, Santos E. Patient satisfaction following treatment with microfocused ultrasound with visualization: Results of a retrospective cross-sectional survey. J Drugs Dermatol 2019; 18 (01) 75-79
- 43 Oni G, Hoxworth R, Teotia S, Brown S, Kenkel JM. Evaluation of a microfocused ultrasound system for improving skin laxity and tightening in the lower face. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (07) 1099-1110
- 44 Park H, Kim E, Kim J, Ro Y, Ko J. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of wrinkles and skin laxity in seven different facial areas. Ann Dermatol 2015; 27 (06) 688-693
- 45 Suh DH, Kim DH, Lim HK, Lee SJ, Song KY, Kim HS. Intense focused ultrasound (IFUS) with a modified parameter on facial tightening: A study on its safety and efficacy. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2016; 18 (08) 448-451
- 46 Biesman B, Verma A, Cheng N, Duncan A. Development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of infraorbital hollowing. J Drugs Dermatol 2023; 22 (01) 74-81
- 47 Dobroshi K, Dodov MG, Crcarevska MS, Raichki RS, Shuleta-Qehaja S, Krasniqi B. Assessment of clients' perceptions and satisfaction with eyebrow mesotherapy treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024; 24: e16699
- 48 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2020 . Accessed July 29, 2025 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2020.pdf
- 49 Chan NP, Shek SY, Yu CS, Ho SG, Yeung CK, Chan HH. Safety study of transcutaneous focused ultrasound for non-invasive skin tightening in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 2011; 43 (05) 366-375
- 50 Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: An overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 2009; 37 (05) 1528-1542
- 51 Werschler WP, Werschler PS. Long-term efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2016; 9 (02) 27-33
- 52 Juhász M, Korta D, Mesinkovska NA. A review of the use of ultrasound for skin tightening, body contouring, and cellulite reduction in dermatology. Dermatol Surg 2018; 44 (07) 949-963
- 53 Wulkan AJ, Fabi SG, Green JB. Microfocused ultrasound for facial photorejuvenation: A review. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (03) 269-275