Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2660-3374
Was kann die fetale Neurosonografie über die Zukunft eines ungeborenen Kindes offenbaren?
Article in several languages: English | deutschAuthors

Clinically apparent birth defects affect 3–4 % of all live births and are responsible for 20 % of infant deaths [1]. Furthermore, slight structural anomalies of the central nervous system (CNS) that are present at birth may only lead to a noticeable delay in neurological development after several years. Since congenital malformations can be attributed to various genetic and non-genetic causes, both imaging techniques and genetic analysis methods are important for prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal neurosonography is currently the method of choice when malformations of the fetal CNS are suspected, with MRI only being used as a secondary method with precise indications [2] [3]. Advances in ultrasound technology and specifically, the transvaginal approach, have greatly improved image resolution and now allow detailed visualization of fetal anatomy as early as the first trimester of pregnancy. 3 D/4 D ultrasound and, more recently, integrated uses of artificial intelligence (AI) were introduced to enhance the diagnostic yield of fetal neurosonography [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. Meanwhile even the AI-supported sonographic analysis of fetal behavior is being discussed for the detection of early neurodevelopmental irregularities [11]. In many countries around the world, pregnant women have access to basic and advanced ultrasound examinations from the first trimester onwards, including assessment of fetal brain development and detection of abnormalities [3] [12] [13] [14]. If necessary, targeted fetal neurosonography can be performed by specialized experts, which includes a more detailed assessment of abnormal findings, e. g., searching for malformations of the cerebral cortex, diagnosing defects of the corpus callosum, and thoroughly characterizing open spinal dysraphism [4] [15] [16] [17]. In the event of abnormal findings, it is the responsibility of the attending physician to advise the parents. This often includes recommending MRI and genetic testing in order to increase diagnostic certainty and, if necessary, offer appropriate treatment [12] [13] [18] [19].
Publication History
Article published online:
06 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data and Statistics on Birth Defects. Accessed August 10, 2025 at: https://www.cdc.gov/birth-defects/resources/index.html
- 2 Tercanli S, Prüfer F. Fetal Neurosonography: Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Competition. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 555-557
- 3 Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 476-484
- 4 Pashaj S, Merz E. 3-Dimensional Ultrasound: How can the Fetal Corpus Callosum Be Demonstrated Correctly?. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42: 278-284
- 5 Altmann R, Scharnreitner I, Auer C. et al. Visualization of the Third Ventricle, the Future Cavum Septi Pellucidi, and the Cavum Veli Interpositi at 11+3 to 13+6 Gestational Weeks on 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound Including Normative Data. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: e72-e82
- 6 Chen Z, Ma Y, Wen H. et al. Sonographic demonstration of the sulci and gyri on the convex surface in normal fetuses using 3D-ICRV rendering technology. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: e284-e295
- 7 Coronado-Gutiérrez D, Eixarch E, Monterde E. et al. Automatic Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Automatic Delineation and Measurement of Fetal Brain Structures in Routine Mid-Trimester Ultrasound Images. Fetal Diagn Ther 2023; 50: 480-490
- 8 Jost E, Kosian P, Jimenez CruzJ. et al. Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6833
- 9 Lasala A, Fiorentino MC, Bandini A. et al. FetalBrainAwareNet: Bridging GANs with anatomical insight for fetal ultrasound brain plane synthesis. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2024; 116: 102405
- 10 Wang L, Fatemi M, Alizad A. Artificial intelligence in fetal brain imaging: Advancements, challenges, and multimodal approaches for biometric and structural analysis. Comput Biol Med 2025; 192: 110312
- 11 Andonotopo W, Bachnas MA, Akbar MIA. et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: transforming prenatal care by integrating Barker’s Hypothesis with AI-driven 4D ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2025; 53: 418-438
- 12 Kozlowski P, Burkhardt T, Gembruch U. et al. DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM and FMF Germany Recommendations for the Implementation of First-Trimester Screening, Detailed Ultrasound, Cell-Free DNA Screening and Diagnostic Procedures. Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40: 176-193
- 13 von Kaisenberg C, Kozlowski P, Kagan KO. et al. Firsttrimester Diagnosis and Therapy @ 11–13+6 Weeks of Gestation – Part 1. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 36-48
- 14 von Kaisenberg C, Kozlowski P, Kagan KO. et al. Firsttrimester Diagnosis and Therapy @ 11–13+6 Weeks of Gestation – Part 2. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 145-161
- 15 Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: performance of targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57: 661-671
- 16 Guilbaud L, Carreras E, Garel C. et al. Proposal for standardized prenatal assessment of fetal open dysraphisms by the European reference network for Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism and Congenital Anomalies (ITHACA) and eUROGEN. Prenat Diagn 2024; 44: 1073-1087
- 17 Vargas-Rodríguez C, Chimenea A, Antiñolo G. et al. Insights into neurosonographic indicators for prenatal diagnosis of fetal neurological anomalies and cortical development: A systematic review of the literature. Early Hum Dev 2024; 197: 106109
- 18 Reischer T, Catic A, Brennus C. et al. The impact of prenatal ultrasound screening on termination of pregnancy with and without feticide: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025; 25: 508
- 19 Wilson RD. Enhanced Recovery after Fetal Sequencing: A Perinatal Genomic Scoping Review of Exome/Genome Testing for Reproductive/Obstetric-MFM Providers to Initiate Knowledge Translation following a Screening Ultrasound Identifying Fetal Anomalies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2025; 1-16
- 20 Pfaff H. Abortions in Germany – results of federal statistics. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2025; 68: 3-10
- 21 Dettmeyer R, Lang J, Axt-Fliedner R. et al. Termination of Pregnancy for Medical Indications under Sec. 218a Para. 2 of the German Criminal Code – Real-life Data from the “Gießen Model”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77: 352-357
- 22 Engels AC, Joyeux L, Brantner C. et al. Sonographic detection of central nervous system defects in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 266-273
- 23 Özalp M, Şal H, Koç EA. et al. Changing Trends over the Years in Pregnancy Termination due to Fetal Anomalies. İstanbul Med J 2021; 22: 149-154
- 24 Henkel A, Beshar I, Cahill EP. et al. Impact of a Potential 20-Week Abortion Ban on Likelihood of Completing Required Views in Second-Trimester Fetal Anatomy Ultrasound. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41: 771-777
- 25 De Keersmaecker B, Jansen K, Aertsen M. et al. Outcome of partial agenesis of corpus callosum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230: 456.e1-456.e9
- 26 Abadia-Cuchi N, Felici F, Frassanito P. et al. Postnatal outcome of fetal cortical malformations: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 64: 581-588
- 27 Cutillo G, Zambon M, Faiola S. et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Isolated Vermian Hypoplasia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review. Cerebellum 2025; 24: 64
- 28 Chen J, Zhu R, Pan H. et al. Relationship between prenatal ultrasound signs and genetic abnormalities for fetal malformations of cortical development. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 472-482
- 29 Favaretto M, Rost M. “A Picture Paints a Thousand Words” – A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues of Prenatal Ultrasound. J Bioeth Inq 2025; 22: 195-212
- 30 Birnbaum R, Ben-Sira L, Lerman-Sagie T. et al. The use of fetal neurosonography and brain MRI in cases of cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: A retrospective analysis with outcome correlation. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 1335-1342
- 31 Gafner M, Hadi E, Haddad L. et al. Disruptive lesions can cause developmental anomalies in the fetal brain: Mini-review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2025; 56: 80-83
- 32 Sileo FG, Zöllner J, DʼAntonio F. et al. Perinatal and long-term outcome of fetal intracranial hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 59: 585-595
- 33 Eldad K, Ya’ara G, Simon L. et al. The association between fetal intracranial hemorrhages detected on MRI and neurodevelopment. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173: 111380
- 34 Faria TCC, Cavalheiro S, da Costa MDS. et al. Functional Motor Skills in Children Who Underwent Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair: Does Anatomic Level Matter?. World Neurosurg 2021; 149: e269-e273
- 35 Aydın E, Duru S, Oria M. et al. Advances in prenatal surgical management of congenital aqueductal stenosis: A bench to bedside approach. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2024; 29: 101540
- 36 Moens A, Albersnagel Z, Veenhof MB. et al. Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Progression of Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Ventriculomegaly: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Prenat Diagn 2025; 45: 1089-1099
- 37 Mustafa HJ, Barbera JP, Sambatur EV. et al. Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 63: 312-320
- 38 Sagar R, David AL. Fetal therapies – (Stem cell transplantation; enzyme replacement therapy; in utero genetic therapies). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 97: 102542
- 39 Malinger G, Prabhu A, Maroto González A. et al. Fetal neurosonography as accurate tool for diagnosis of brain involvement in tuberous sclerosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62: 391-397
- 40 Boff MO, Xavier FAC, Diz FM. et al. mTORopathies in Epilepsy and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Future of Therapeutics and the Role of Gene Editing. Cells 2025; 14: 662
- 41 Castillo J, Locastro MM, Corroenne R. et al. Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele longitudinal follow-up model: Mitigation of care fragmentation through care coordination and outcomes reporting. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2025; 18: 146-154
- 42 Neißkenwirth R, Mathys C, Hitz MP. et al. Rehabilitation in a child with Chiari II malformation, lumbosacral meningomyelocele, achondroplasia and impaired respiratory regulation – a case report and literature review. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2025; 18: 137-145
- 43 Russ JB, Agarwal S, Venkatesan C. et al. Fetal malformations of cortical development: review and clinical guidance. Brain 2025; 148: 1888-1903
- 44 Sapantzoglou I, Asimakopoulos G, Fasoulakis Z. et al. Prenatal detection of mild fetal ventriculomegaly – a systematic review of the modern literature. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 73-85
- 45 Carta S, Kaelin Agten A, Belcaro C. et al. Outcome of fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of isolated severe bilateral ventriculomegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 165-173
- 46 Qiu L, Chen N, Luo H. Fetal periventricular pseudocysts: is MRI evaluation needed? What is the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307: 1697-1711
- 47 Bernardes da Cunha S, Carneiro MC, Miguel SaM. et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes following Prenatal Diagnosis of Isolated Corpus Callosum Agenesis: A Systematic Review. Fetal Diagn Ther 2021; 48: 88-95
- 48 Libzon S, Shiran SI, Fattal-Valevski A. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of perinatal intracranial haemorrhage in patients born at term: A prospective study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2025; 67: 1266-1279
- 49 Gottschalk I, Weber EC, Bedei I. et al. Intrauterine Therapy. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 440-471
- 50 Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY. et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 993-1004
- 51 Sgayer I, Khatib N, Lowenstein L. et al. Fetal Cerebral Ventricular Asymmetry Without Dilation: A Systematic Review. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 483-491
- 52 Rüegg L, Zepf J, Gonser M. et al. M-sign in middle cerebral artery Doppler in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome – A retrospective cohort study. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 492-498
- 53 Bronshtein M, Gover A, Beloosesky R. et al. Fetal premature excess vertebral linear calcification: a case series. Ultraschall in Med 2025; 46: 505-507
- 54 Müller T, Martiny H, Merz E. et al. DEGUM Recommendations on Infection Prevention in Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2018; 39: 284-303
- 55 Kollmann C, Jenderka KV, Moran CM. et al. EFSUMB Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound – (2019 revision). Ultraschall in Med 2020; 41: 387-389
- 56 Dudwiesus H, Merz E. How safe is it to use ultrasound in prenatal medicine? Facts and contradictions – Part 2 – Laboratory experiments regarding non-thermal effects and epidemiological studies. Ultraschall in Med 2021; 42: 460-502