PDF icon PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2628-2364
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Fetal Weight Extrapolation Following a Third-Trimester Ultrasound Examination Using the Gestation-Adjusted Projection Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Micah M. Vaughn-Valencia
1   Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Yan D. Zhao
2   Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Rodney K. Edwards
3   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
,
Shari Clifton
4   Department of Health Sciences Library and Information Management, Graduate College, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Hugh C. G. Nadeau
1   Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
› Institutsangaben
Funding This study was partially funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grant: 2U54GM104938-06), which supports the Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources—Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design core (OSCTR BERD).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar aufeRefHebammen
  Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective

Using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method of fetal weight extrapolation in the prediction of actual birth weight.

Study Design

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception to June 2023. Studies were compiled that assessed the accuracy of the GAP method in pregnant women at term (≥37 weeks gestation) with an ultrasound performed at 34 to 36 weeks gestation. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the GAP method and the actual birth weight using the mean percent error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percent error. Means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I 2 and tau2 statistics.

Results

The search identified 949 records. After a full-text review, a total of eight studies with 5,306 subjects were included. Studies were retrospective and prospective cohort studies. All studies were deemed high quality and determined to have a low risk of bias. Five studies were performed in the United States, one in Italy, one in Spain, and one in the United Kingdom. Four studies included patients with pregestational or gestational diabetes and obesity. Due to substantial heterogeneity, the random-effects model was used to estimate the effects of studies. The mean percent error was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.1–5.2), the mean absolute error was 240 g (95% CI: 205–275 g), and the mean absolute percent error was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.9–9.1).

Conclusion

The GAP method of fetal weight extrapolation is an accurate approach to birth weight prediction and is suitable for use in a diverse population. The study protocol was submitted for online registration in the International Register of Prospective Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) before the literature review was undertaken (registration number: CRD42023392977).

Key Points

  • Estimation of fetal weight is useful for delivery planning.

  • The GAP method uses third-trimester ultrasound data.

  • The GAP method is an accurate approach to birth weight prediction.

Keywords

birth weight - estimated fetal weight - extrapolation - gestation-adjusted projection - meta-analysis - systematic review - ultrasound


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Januar 2025

Angenommen: 02. Juni 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
05. Juni 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Juni 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA