Thromb Haemost
DOI: 10.1055/a-2615-4785
Original Article

Thromboembolic risk among patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with or without heparin thromboprophylaxis

1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Rainer Kaiser
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Julius Fischer
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Angelina Kraechan
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Lisa Wasner
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Thomas Marchant Seiter
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Ludwig Weckbach
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Konstantin Stark
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Jörg Hausleiter
2   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Steffen Massberg
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
,
Clemens Scherer
1   LMU Klinikum Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Munich, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN569432)
› Author Affiliations

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among hospitalized patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended for thromboprophylaxis, but its benefits in non-surgical patients, particularly those receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), remain unclear. Currently, evidence on the risks and benefits of LMWH thromboprophylaxis in patients on DAPT is lacking. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients hospitalized in the cardiology departments of two hospitals of LMU University Munich between May 2015 and April 2025. Patients receiving DAPT, defined as treatment with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, were analyzed. The study population was divided into two groups: those who received LMWH prophylaxis and those who did not. The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE during hospitalization, confirmed through imaging techniques. Secondary endpoints included the need for erythrocyte transfusion. Results: A total of 8,567 patients receiving DAPT were included, of which 2,378 were receiving LMWH prophylaxis. The incidence of VTE was very low and did not differ between the LMWH and non-LMWH groups (0.04% vs. 0%, p=0.28). Subgroup analysis revealed higher bleeding rates as mirrored by more erythrocyte transfusions in the LMWH group (9.4 vs. 5.1%, p=0.004). Conclusion: In patients receiving DAPT, LMWH thromboprophylaxis was associated with a comparably low incidence of VTE but a higher rate of erythrocyte transfusions in subgroup analysis.



Publication History

Received: 26 January 2025

Accepted after revision: 18 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 May 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany