Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2608-1346
Evaluating Patient Outcomes and Access to Care in Aortic Surgery Based on Ethnicity and Social Vulnerability
Funding None.

Abstract
Background
We previously demonstrated the impact of ethnicity on aortic surgery, with underrepresentation and greater acuity in minority patients, raising concerns regarding access to care. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index (SVI) measure is increasingly used to quantify patient socioeconomic and demographic factors. This study expands on our prior work by incorporating SVI and ethnicity to analyze patient presentation and outcomes in aortic arch surgery.
Methods
We utilized a single-institution database of patients who underwent total arch replacement or hemiarch repair between 2009 and 2022. A total of 837 patients were placed into five cohorts based on their self-reported race: African American, Asian, Caucasian, Hispanic, and Other, with further subdivision based on SVI (high social vulnerability, ≥75%, normal social vulnerability < 75%). Additional analyses were performed using SVI alone. We compared patient presentation, operative variables, and outcomes based on the above cohorts.
Results
African American and Hispanic patients were underrepresented compared with city demographics. High SVI and minority patients presented at younger ages (p = 0.007) with higher blood pressures (p = 0.002). These groups also had more urgent/emergent presentations (p < 0.001) with aortic dissections (p = 0.006). Operatively, high SVI groups had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.018), cross-clamp (p = 0.020), and circulatory arrest times (p = 0.002) but fewer adjunctive procedures (p = 0.018). High SVI patients more often required total arch replacement (p = 0.048) and postoperative mechanical circulatory support (p = 0.025). After discharge, African Americans had more emergency department (ED) visits within a year (p < 0.001), although no significant differences were observed in readmission rates or cardiovascular follow-up.
Conclusion
Underrepresented groups face barriers to care, as reflected in disparities in demographics, surgical acuity, and postdischarge ED usage. Analyses-based solely on ethnicity overlooked critical differences between normal and high SVI groups, emphasizing the need for care strategies that are both tailored to high SVI groups and racially sensitive applied across all levels of health care.
Keywords
aortic arch surgery - social vulnerability index - health disparities - ethnicity and surgical outcomes - access to carePublication History
Received: 09 September 2024
Accepted: 14 May 2025
Article published online:
03 June 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Kabbani LS, Wasilenko S, Nypaver TJ. et al. Socioeconomic disparities affect survival after aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64 (05) 1239-1245
- 2 Newell P, Zogg C, Asokan S. et al. Race and socioeconomic disparities in proximal aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 117 (04) 761-768
- 3 Preventza O, Henry J, Khan L. et al. Unplanned readmissions, community socioeconomic factors, and their effects on long-term survival after complex thoracic aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025; 169 (01) 26-35.e2
- 4 Mota L, Marcaccio CL, Patel PB. et al. The impact of neighborhood social disadvantage on abdominal aortic aneurysm severity and management. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77 (04) 1077-1086.e2
- 5 Diaz A, Hyer JM, Barmash E, Azap R, Paredes AZ, Pawlik TM. County-level social vulnerability is associated with worse surgical outcomes especially among minority patients. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (06) 881-891
- 6 Diaz A, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras D, Pawlik TM. The impact of social vulnerability subthemes on postoperative outcomes differs by racial/ethnic minority status. Am J Surg 2022; 223 (02) 353-359
- 7 Neiman PU, Flaherty MM, Salim A. et al. Evaluating the complex association between Social Vulnerability Index and trauma mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92 (05) 821-830
- 8 Herrera-Escobar JP, Uribe-Leitz T, Wang J. et al. The Social Vulnerability Index and long-term outcomes after traumatic injury. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (01) 22-29
- 9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (DCD/ATSDR). A Validity Assessment of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Social Vulnerability Index (CDC/ATSDR SVI) Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC/ATSDR, 2024
- 10 Preventza O, Akpan-Smart E, Lubna K. et al. Racial disparities in thoracic aortic surgery: myth or reality?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024; 167 (01) 3-12.e1
- 11 Chatterjee S, LeMaire SA, Amarasekara HS. et al. Differential presentation in acuity and outcomes based on socioeconomic status in patients who undergo thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163 (06) 1990-1998.e1