Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2572-1646
Predictive Capacity of First-Trimester Diagnosis of Placenta Previa
Funding M.S. was supported by a training grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD; T32 HD007203–42). E.N.T. was supported by a mentored career development award from the NICHD (K12 HD001259–24).

Abstract
Objective
First-trimester transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) is sometimes used to diagnose placenta previa and counsel patients accordingly. We aimed to determine the predictive capacity of a first-trimester transabdominal ultrasonographic placenta previa diagnosis for persistence to the second trimester.
Study Design
Retrospective cohort study of patients with singleton pregnancies and first-trimester transabdominal ultrasonographic placenta previa diagnoses from January to December 2022. The primary outcome was the predictive capacity of a first-trimester TAUS diagnosis of placenta previa for placenta previa persistence into the second trimester. Secondary outcomes included the predictive capacity of a first-trimester TAUS for placenta previa persistence to delivery and risk factors associated with placenta previa persistence. Chi-square and student's t-test were used to determine statistical significance, and a multivariable logistic regression determined the strength of associations.
Results
Of the 185 patients with a first-trimester TAUS diagnosis of placenta previa, 159 (86.0%) resolved by the second-trimester resulting in a predictive capacity for persistence to the second-trimester of 14.0%. Moreover, 182 (98.4%) were resolved by delivery, resulting in a predictive capacity for persistence to delivery of 1.6%. Among the 27 patients with a prior cesarean delivery, the predictive capacity of a first-trimester placenta previa diagnosis for persistence to the second-trimester was 22.2% and to delivery was 7.4%. Advanced maternal age and posterior placenta in the first trimester were risk factors for previa persistence to the second trimester, while prior cesarean delivery and reproductive assistance were not.
Conclusion
First-trimester transabdominal ultrasonographic placenta previa diagnosis has a poor predictive capacity for placenta previa persistence to the second trimester and even lower for persistence to delivery. Counseling patients regarding placenta previa diagnosis in the first trimester may result in unnecessary patient anxiety and activity restrictions.
Key Points
-
First-trimester transabdominal placenta previa diagnosis has poor predictive capacity.
-
Counseling regarding first-trimester placenta previa may result in unnecessary patient anxiety.
-
Studies are needed to see whether patients prefer placenta previa disclosure in the first trimester.
Keywords
first-trimester ultrasound - transabdominal ultrasound - placenta previa - prenatal diagnosisPublication History
Received: 08 November 2024
Accepted: 02 April 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
02 April 2025
Article published online:
22 April 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 McShane PM, Heyl PS, Epstein MF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65 (02) 176-182
- 2 Gorodeski IG, Bahari CM. The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal-neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med 1987; 15 (02) 169-177
- 3 Faiz AS, Ananth CV. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13 (03) 175-190
- 4 Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (04) 771-778
- 5 Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis history of cesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071
- 6 Ananth CV, Demissie K, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (01) 275-281
- 7 Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284 (01) 47-51
- 8 Rasmussen S, Albrechtsen S, Dalaker K. Obstetric history and the risk of placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79 (06) 502-507
- 9 Downes KL, Hinkle SN, Sjaarda LA, Albert PS, Grantz KL. Previous prelabor or intrapartum cesarean delivery and risk of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (05) 669.e1-669.e6
- 10 Karami M, Jenabi E, Fereidooni B. The association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (14) 1940-1947
- 11 Shobeiri F, Jenabi E. Smoking and placenta previa: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (24) 2985-2990
- 12 Macones GA, Sehdev HM, Parry S, Morgan MA, Berlin JA. The association between maternal cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177 (05) 1097-1100
- 13 King LJ, Dhanya Mackeen A, Nordberg C, Paglia MJ. Maternal risk factors associated with persistent placenta previa. Placenta 2020; 99: 189-192
- 14 Breintoft K, Pinnerup R, Henriksen TB. et al. Endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (04) 667
- 15 Matsuzaki S, Nagase Y, Ueda Y. et al. The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (05) 100417
- 16 Jenabi E, Salimi Z, Bashirian S, Khazaei S, Ayubi E. The risk factors associated with placenta previa: An umbrella review. Placenta 2022; 117: 21-27
- 17 Sinclair S, Masters HR, DeFranco E, Rountree S, Warshak CR. Universal transvaginal cervical length screening during pregnancy increases the diagnostic incidence of low-lying placenta and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (01) 100255
- 18 Becker RH, Vonk R, Mende BC, Ragosch V, Entezami M. The relevance of placental location at 20-23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17 (06) 496-501
- 19 Lauria MR, Smith RS, Treadwell MC. et al. The use of second-trimester transvaginal sonography to predict placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8 (05) 337-340
- 20 Smith RS, Lauria MR, Comstock CH. et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low-lying or over the internal cervical os. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9 (01) 22-24
- 21 Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (04) 927-941
- 22 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM. et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (01) 102-113
- 23 AIUM practice parameter for the performance of detailed diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations between 12 weeks 0 days and 13 weeks 6 days. J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40 (05) E1-E16 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852128
- 24 von Kaisenberg C, Chaoui R, Häusler M. et al. Quality requirements for the early fetal ultrasound assessment at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation (DEGUM levels II and III). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37 (03) 297-302
- 25 Chapman MG, Furness ET, Jones WR, Sheat JH. Significance of the ultrasound location of placental site in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86 (11) 846-848
- 26 Timor-Tritsch IE, Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81 (5 ( Pt 1)): 742-744
- 27 Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging workshop invited participants*. fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolog. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1070-1082
- 28 Sunna E, Ziadeh S. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for the diagnosis of placenta praevia. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 19 (02) 152-154
- 29 Sherman SJ, Carlson DE, Platt LD, Medearis AL. Transvaginal ultrasound: does it help in the diagnosis of placenta previa?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2 (04) 256-260
- 30 Rosati P, Guariglia L. Clinical significance of placenta previa detected at early routine transvaginal scan. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19 (08) 581-585
- 31 Hill LM, DiNofrio DM, Chenevey P. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of first-trimester placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5 (05) 301-303
- 32 Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V, Ylöstalo P. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12-16 weeks in a nonselected population. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (03) 364-367
- 33 Mustafá SA, Brizot ML, Carvalho MHB, Watanabe L, Kahhale S, Zugaib M. Transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting placenta previa at delivery: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20 (04) 356-359
- 34 Papp KK, Stoller EP, Sage P. et al. The effects of sleep loss and fatigue on resident-physicians: a multi-institutional, mixed-method study. Acad Med 2004; 79 (05) 394-406
- 35 Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66 (01) 89-92
- 36 Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99 (06) 976-980
- 37 Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler DM. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99 (5 Pt 1): 692-697
- 38 Jansen CHJR, Kleinrouweler CE, van Leeuwen L, Ruiter L, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Which second trimester placenta previa remains a placenta previa in the third trimester: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 254: 119-123
- 39 Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V, Ylöstalo P. Transvaginal ultrasonography at 18-23 weeks in predicting placenta previa at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12 (06) 422-425
- 40 Sarker MR, Rosenberg HM, Warren L, Ferrara L, Bianco A, Debolt CA. Mid-trimester sonographic placenta previa thickness and persistence at delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 296: 59-64
- 41 Durst JK, Tuuli MG, Temming LA, Hamilton O, Dicke JM. Resolution of a low-lying placenta and placenta previa diagnosed at the midtrimester anatomy scan. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (08) 2011-2019
- 42 Pradhan S, Tuladhar A, Shrestha A, Amatya NB, Pradhan P. Sonographic assessment of placental migration in second trimester low lying placenta. Nepal Med Coll J 2012; 14 (04) 331-333
- 43 Cho JY, Lee YH, Moon MH, Lee JH. Difference in migration of placenta according to the location and type of placenta previa. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 36 (02) 79-84
- 44 Bardi F, Bakker M, Kenkhuis MJA. et al. Psychological outcomes, knowledge and preferences of pregnant women on first-trimester screening for fetal structural abnormalities: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16 (01) e0245938
- 45 Kim SW, Hamm RF, Schwartz N. A resolved placenta previa is still associated with postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41 (s 01): e928-e933
- 46 DeBolt CA, Rosenberg HM, Pruzan A. et al. Patients with resolution of low-lying placenta and placenta previa remain at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60 (01) 103-108
- 47 Feldman KM, Robinson A, Gellman C. et al. Resolved but not forgotten: the effect of resolved placenta previa on labor management. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (15) 1614-1621
- 48 Toscano M, Royzer R, Castillo D, Li D, Poleshuck E. Prevalence of depression or anxiety during antepartum hospitalizations for obstetric complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137 (05) 881-891