Strategic Decision-Making in Preservation Rhinoplasty: Key Considerations for Optimal Outcomes

Abstract

Aim and Background Candidacy for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) techniques is determined by a combination of preoperative nasal analysis and intraoperative assessment of the bony vault and septum. Classic ideal candidates have a pleasing frontal aesthetic, shorter nasal bones, bony cap at or cephalic to the rhinion, straight and appropriately narrow dorsal aesthetic lines (DALs), and a small to medium-sized hump.

Current and Future Development Alongside the growing popularity of DPR in recent years there have been numerous new methods described for approaching the bony vault and septum that expand both the definition of dorsal preservation and its potential indications. These techniques expand DPR candidacy to the crooked nose, S-shaped hump, wide or irregular DALs, and deviated caudal septum.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance The decision toward choosing a dorsal preservation approach is nuanced, surgeon-dependent, and may be less obvious with these new modifications. Classical or modified DPR, when executed well in appropriate candidates, is an excellent method to achieve a natural reduction of the dorsal profile.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - dorsal preservation - preservation rhinoplasty - dorsal hump - facial plastic surgery

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. April 2025

• References

• 1 Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P. Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 117-131
• 2 Daniel RK. The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (02) 228-229
• 3 Goodale JL. A new method for the operative correction of exaggerated roman nose. Boston Med Surg J 1899; 140: 112
• 4 Goodale JL. The correction of old lateral displacements of the nasal bones. Boston Med Surg J 1901; 145: 538-539
• 5 Lothrop O. An operation for correcting the aquiline nasal deformity; the use of new instrument; report of a case. Boston Med Surg J 1914; 170: 835-837
• 6 Palhazi P, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The osseocartilaginous vault of the nose: anatomy and surgical observations. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (03) 242-251
• 7 Meyer MK, Patel PN, Most SP. Understanding dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: anatomy and biomechanics. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics 2024
• 8 Ferreira MG, Dias DR, Cardoso L. et al. Dorsal hump reduction based on the new ethmoidal point classification: a clinical and radiological study of the keystone area in 138 patients. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (09) 950-959
• 9 Eravci FC, Özer H, Arbağ H, Eryilmaz MA, Aricigil M, Dündar MA. Computed tomography analysis of nasal anatomy in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (03) 249-256
• 10 Sadri A, East C, Badia L, Saban Y. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: core beam computed tomography analysis of the nasal vault, septum, and skull base-its role in surgical planning. Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36 (03) 329-334
• 11 Demirel O, Atesci MS. Preservation rhinoplasty: assessment of anatomical safe boundaries on computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (02) 570-574
• 12 Rodrigues Dias D, Cardoso L, Santos M, Sousa E Castro S, Almeida E Sousa C, Gonçalves Ferreira M. Clinical Implications in Structured and Preservation Rhinoplasty. The caucasian hump: radiologic study of the osteocartilaginous vault versus surface anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (03) 523-531
• 13 Goksel A, Saban Y. Open piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (01) 113-118
• 14 Patel PN, Most SP. Combining open structural and dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 97-109
• 15 Toriumi DM, Kovacevic M, Kosins AM. Structural preservation rhinoplasty: a hybrid approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (05) 1105-1120
• 16 Alan MA, Kahraman ME, Yüksel F, Yücel A. Comparison of dorsal preservation and dorsal reduction rhinoplasty: analysis of nasal patency and aesthetic outcomes by rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS scales. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (02) 728-734
• 17 Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP. A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (02) 71-79
• 18 Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: method and outcomes of the modified subdorsal strip method. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2021; 29 (01) 29-37
• 19 Taş BM, Erden B. Comparison of nasal functional outcomes of let down rhinoplasty and open technical rhinoplasty using spreader graft. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (02) 371-377
• 20 Abdelwahab MA, Neves CA, Patel PN, Most SP. Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (03) 879-887
• 21 Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction: outcomes after a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (03) 202-207
• 22 Kosins AM, Daniel RK. Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty: a 100 case series with one-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (01) 34-48
• 23 Neves JC, Tagle DA, Dewes W, Ferraz M. A segmental approach in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty: the tetris concept. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2021; 29 (01) 85-99
• 24 Goksel A, Saban Y, Tran KN. Biomechanical nasal anatomy applied to open preservation rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (01) 12-21
• 25 Ferraz MBJ, Sella GCP. Indications for preservation rhinoplasty: avoiding complications. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (01) 45-52
• 26 Ishida J, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Vieira JC, Ferreira MC. Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (06) 1729-1733 , discussion 1734–1735
• 27 Öztürk G. Push-down technique without osteotomy: a new approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (03) 891-901
• 28 Robotti E, Chauke-Malinga NY, Leone F. A modified dorsal split preservation technique for nasal humps with minor bony component: a preliminary report. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (05) 1257-1268
• 29 Robotti E, Cottone G, Leone F. Modified dorsal split preservation hybrid rhinoplasty for cartilaginous pushdown and full letdown applications: a PROM-based review of 100 consecutive cases. Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39 (04) 441-451
• 30 Tuncel U, Kurt A, Saban Y. Dorsal preservation surgery: a novel modification for dorsal shaping and hump reduction. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (11) 1252-1261
• 31 Erdal AI, Genç İG, Şibar S. Lateral crural turn-up flap for increasing the volume of cartilaginous nasal sidewall in closed-approach dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 91 (05) 524-528
• 32 Öztürk G. Upper lateral cartilage overlapping on the high dorsum with the let-down technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (06) 2590-2597
• 33 Taş S. Dorsal roof technique for dorsum preservation in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (03) 263-275
• 34 Gonçalves Ferreira M, Santos M, Rosa F. et al. Spare roof technique: a new technique for hump removal-the step-by-step guide. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 403-406
• 35 Ishida LC, Ishida J, Ishida LH, Tartare A, Fernandes RK, Gemperli R. Nasal hump treatment with cartilaginous push-down and preservation of the bony cap. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (11) 1168-1178
• 36 Neves JC, Erol O, Arancibia-Tagle D, Ilhan E. Precision segmental preservation rhinoplasty: avoiding widening, defining new dorsal esthetic lines in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2023; 31 (01) 155-170
• 37 East C. Preservation rhinoplasty and the crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2021; 29 (01) 123-130
• 38 Özücer B, Çam OH. The effectiveness of asymmetric dorsal preservation for correction of I-shaped crooked nose deformity in comparison to conventional technique. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (04) 286-293
• 39 Öztürk G. Hybrid preservation rhinoplasty: combining mix-down and semi let-push down techniques. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 (06) 1885-1889
• 40 Öztürk G. Combination of the push-down and let-down techniques: mix-down approaches. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (03) 1140-1149
• 41 Jasso-Ramírez E, Burgos-Páez A, Sánchez Y Béjar F, Friedman O, Kern E, López-Ulloa F. Twisted nose: preservation rhinoplasty with modified push-down/let-down technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (04) 749-757
• 42 Neves JC, Arancibia Tagle D, Dewes W, Ferraz M. The segmental preservation rhinoplasty: the split tetris concept. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (01) 36-44
• 43 Patel PN, Most SP. Overview of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2023; 31 (01) 1-11
• 44 Kovacevic M, Veit JA, Toriumi DM. Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the Cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29 (04) 244-251
• 45 Spataro E, Olds C, Nuyen B, Kandathil CK, Most SP. Comparison of primary and secondary anterior septal reconstruction: a cohort study. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (01) 65-67
• 46 Surowitz J, Lee MK, Most SP. Anterior septal reconstruction for treatment of severe caudal septal deviation: clinical severity and outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (01) 27-33
• 47 Patel PN, Kandathil CK, Most SP. Outcomes of combined anterior septal reconstruction and dorsal hump reduction. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (12) E803-E810
• 48 Gruber RP, Chang E, Buchanan E. Suture techniques in rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 231-243
• 49 Longino ES, Rossi-Meyer MK, Most SP. The dorsal flattening suture (DFS) in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025;
• 50 Most SP. Comprehensive rhinoplasty: structural and preservation concepts. St. Louis. Missouri: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc.; 2023