Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on the Incidence of No Prenatal Care

Takaki Tanamoto; Misa Hayasaka; Lindsay Robbins; George Saade; Tetsuya Kawakita

doi:10.1055/a-2535-8309

American Journal of Perinatology, Table of Contents

Am J Perinatol 2025; 42(13): 1778-1785
DOI: 10.1055/a-2535-8309

Original Article

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on the Incidence of No Prenatal Care

Takaki Tanamoto

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Yokosuka, Japan

,

Misa Hayasaka

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

,

Lindsay Robbins

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

³Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Maternal and Child Health Equity and Advocacy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia

,

George Saade

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

,

Tetsuya Kawakita

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia

³Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Maternal and Child Health Equity and Advocacy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to examine the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the racial disparity in prenatal care utilization in the United States before and during the pandemic.

Study Design

This was a cross-sectional study using the National Vital Statistics Data from 2018 to 2022. Our focus was on low-risk individuals who delivered singleton pregnancies at term. The analysis was restricted to Black and White individuals to explore racial disparities. The study periods based on the last menstrual period (LMP) were prepandemic (March 2018–February 2020) and pandemic (March 2020–February 2022). The primary outcome was the rate of no prenatal care. We employed interrupted time series analysis, negative binomial regression models, adjusting for confounders, seasonality, and autocorrelation. We conducted postestimation analyses to calculate the counterfactual and actual incidences of outcomes for individuals with an LMP in March 2020 and February 2022. Difference-in-difference (DID) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was estimated.

Results

The analysis included 3,511,813 individuals in the prepandemic period and 5,163,486 in the pandemic period. For individuals with LMP in March 2020, the actual incidences of no prenatal care per 100 births were 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0, 3.3) for Black individuals and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2, 2.0) for White individuals. The difference between counterfactual and actual no prenatal care rates per 100 births for Black individuals was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.5), indicating a significant increase in no prenatal care. Conversely, there was no significant difference for White individuals. DID analysis further demonstrated that this increase was greater in Black individuals compared with White individuals (DID per 100 births 0.3 [95% CI: 0.1, 0.5]). For individuals with LMP in February 2022, this difference in disparity further worsened (DID per 100 births 0.8 [95% CI: 0.4, 1.2]).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic increased the incidence of no prenatal care, which disproportionately affected Black individuals.

Key Points

The COVID-19 pandemic increased racial disparities.
The increase in no prenatal care among Black individuals.
White individuals are lower affected during this period.

Keywords

coronavirus disease 2019 - APNCU index - no prenatal care - Black - pandemic

Full Text

References

References
1 World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. World Health Organization; 2016. . Accessed September 26, 2024 at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/250796
2 Kassaw A, Debie A, Geberu DM. Quality of prenatal care and associated factors among pregnant women at public health facilities of Wogera District, Northwest Ethiopia. J Pregnancy 2020; 2020: 9592124
3 Gadson A, Akpovi E, Mehta PK. Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41 (05) 308-317
4 Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery 2021; 98: 102991
5 Martin AJ, Osterman JKM. Changes in Prenatal Care Utilization: United States, 2019–2021. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.); National Vital Statistics System 2023; 72 (04) 1-14
6 Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (09) 1414-1420
7 Zangmo R, Kumari A, Garg D, Sharma KA. Redesigning routine antenatal care in low resource setting during COVID-19 pandemic. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9 (09) 4547-4551
8 Data Access - Vital Statistics Online; August 20, 2024. Accessed September 26, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm
9 Koroukian SM, Rimm AA. The “Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization” (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: is the index biased?. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55 (03) 296-305
10 Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed 2020; 91 (01) 157-160
11 CDC. The changing threat of COVID-19. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. May 29, 2024. Accessed September 26, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncird/whats-new/changing-threat-covid-19.html
12 American Academy of Pediatrics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 8th ed.. American Academy of Pediatrics; The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017
13 Lopez Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46 (01) 348-355
14 Godfrey LG. Misspecification tests and their uses in econometrics. J Stat Plan Inference 1996; 49 (02) 241-260
15 Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata 2015; 15 (02) 480-500
16 AlJahdali EA, AlSinani NS. Pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age in a tertiary Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2022; 43 (05) 491-499
17 Baeten JM, Bukusi EA, Lambe M. Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91 (03) 436-440
18 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Study Outreach for Prenatal Care. Prenatal Care: Reaching Mothers, Reaching Infants. Brown SS. Ed National Academies Press; 1988: 731
19 Peahl AF, Powell A, Berlin H. et al. Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224 (04) 384.e1-384.e11
20 Julceus EF, Olatosi B, Hung P, Zhang J, Li X, Liu J. Racial disparities in adequacy of prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina, 2018-2021. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23 (01) 686
21 Foghaha MH, Yazdanpanahi Z, Babaei AH. Assessment of Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index and its affecting factors. Pak J Med Health Sci 2018; 12 (02) 924-929

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material