PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2535-0153
Original Research

The Effectiveness of Functional Septorhinoplasty in Improving COVID-19-related Olfactory Dysfunction

Alfonso Luca Pendolino 
1   Department of ENT, Royal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
2   Ear Institute, UCL, London, United Kingdom
,
Bruno Scarpa
3   Department of Statistical Sciences and Department of Mathematics Tullio Levi-Civita, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
,
Peter J. Andrews 
1   Department of ENT, Royal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
2   Ear Institute, UCL, London, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Long-Term COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction (C19OD) remains a significant challenge with no established treatment providing meaningful improvement. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of functional septorhinoplasty (fSRP) in improving olfactory dysfunction in patients with persistent C19OD compared to a control group undergoing olfactory training (OT). In this prospective study patients with persistent C19OD undergoing fSRP were enrolled while those declining surgery continued with OT as the control group. Patients were followed for six months with olfactory function assessed using Sniffin' Sticks (S'S) and nasal airflow evaluated through peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and acoustic rhinometry (AR). Among the participants 12 underwent fSRP while 13 were in the control group. Significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all S'S scores were observed in the fSRP group but not in the control group. TDI scores improved above the minimal clinically important difference only in the fSRP group. Strong correlations were found between olfactory scores and nasal measurements. Comparison of olfactory threshold gains between groups revealed a statistically significant benefit in the fSRP group. These findings suggest that fSRP can significantly improve persistent C19OD providing a notable olfactory threshold gain compared to OT.

Keywords

olfaction - olfactory dysfunction - post-infectious olfactory dysfunction - COVID-19 - septorhinoplasty


Publikationsverlauf

Accepted Manuscript online:
10. Februar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Februar 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Andrews PJ, Pendolino AL, Ottaviano G. et al. Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild-to-moderate symptomatic COVID-19 positive health care workers: an international survey. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020; 5 (06) 1019-1028
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bordin A, Mucignat-Caretta C, Gaudioso P. et al. Comparison of self-reported symptoms and psychophysical tests in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) subjects experiencing long-term olfactory dysfunction: a 6-month follow-up study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 11 (11) 1592-1595
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pendolino AL, Tan HQM, Choi D, Ottaviano G, Andrews PJ. Long-term quality-of-life impairment in patients with more than 1-year COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13 (02) 160-164
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Pendolino AL, Ottaviano G, Navaratnam AV, Scarpa B, Andrews PJ. Clinical factors influencing olfactory performance in patients with persistent COVID-19 smell loss longer than 1 year. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2023; 8 (06) 1449-1458
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Patel ZM, Holbrook EH, Turner JH. et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: olfaction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12 (04) 327-680
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Boscolo-Rizzo P, Hummel T, Spinato G. et al. Olfactory and gustatory function 3 years after mild COVID-19—a cohort psychophysical study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 150 (01) 79-81
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Liang F, Wang Y. COVID-19 anosmia: high prevalence, plural neuropathogenic mechanisms, and scarce neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2?. Viruses 2021; 13 (11) 2225
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Khan M, Yoo SJ, Clijsters M. et al. Visualizing in deceased COVID-19 patients how SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory and olfactory mucosae but spares the olfactory bulb. Cell 2021; 184 (24) 5932-5949.e15
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pfaff MJ, Bertrand AA, Lipman KJ. et al. The effect of functional nasal surgery on olfactory function. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (03) 707-718
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Whitcroft KL, Mancini L, Yousry T, Hummel T, Andrews PJ. Functional septorhinoplasty alters brain structure and function: neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory dysfunction. Front Allergy 2023; 4: 1079945
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Valsamidis K, Printza A, Titelis K, Constantinidis J, Triaridis S. Olfaction and quality of life in patients with nasal septal deviation treated with septoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40 (05) 747-754
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Fyrmpas G, Tsalighopoulos M, Constantinidis J. Lateralized olfactory difference in patients with a nasal septal deviation before and after septoplasty*. Hippokratia 2012; 16 (02) 166-169
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pfaar O, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T. Assessment of olfactory function after septoplasty: a longitudinal study. Rhinology 2004; 42 (04) 195-199
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Altundag A, Salihoglu M, Tekeli H, Saglam M, Cayonu M, Hummel T. Lateralized differences in olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume relate to nasal septum deviation. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (02) 359-362
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Mackers P, Rojas-Lechuga MJ, Langdon C, Noguà S A, Mullol J, Alobid I. Septoplasty and/or inferior turbinoplasty produce significant improvements of the sense of smell. Rhinology 2023; 61 (05) 421-431
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Elbistanli MS, Koçak HE, Çelik M. et al. Significance of medial osteotomy on the olfactory function in patients who underwent septorhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) e106-e109
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Dengiz R, Haytoğlu S, Görgülü O, Doğru M, Arıkan OK. Effect of septorhinoplasty on olfactory function: assessment using the brief smell identification test. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 53 (01) 4-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Dalgic A, Is A, Dinc ME, Ulusoy S, Avinçsal MO, Kulekci M. The effects of nasal packing and transseptal suturing after septoplasty on olfactory function, patient comfort, and mucociliary clearance. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) e487-e490
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kilicaslan A, Acar GO, Tekin M, Ozdamar OI. Assessment the long-term effects of septoplasty surgery on olfactory function. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (10) 1079-1084
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Haytoğlu S, Dengiz R, Muluk NB, Kuran G, Arikan OK. Effects of septoplasty on olfactory function evaluated by the Brief Smell Identification Test: a study of 116 patients. Ear Nose Throat J 2017; 96 (10-11): 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ulusoy S, Dinç ME, Dalğıç A, Dizdar D, Avınçsal MO, Külekçi M. Effects of spreader grafts on olfactory function in septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (01) 106-113
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shemshadi H, Azimian M, Onsori MA, Azizabadi Farahani M. Olfactory function following open rhinoplasty: a 6-month follow-up study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2008; 8: 6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Choi YS, Ryu YJ, Rhee J. et al. Clinical implications of septal deviation in lateralized olfaction. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 9 (01) 39-43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Gupta N, Singh PP, Bagla RK. Will septal correction surgery for deviated nasal septum improve the sense of smell? A prospective study. Surg Res Pract 2015; 2015: 496542
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Stevens CN, Stevens MH. Quantitative effects of nasal surgery on olfaction. Am J Otolaryngol 1985; 6 (04) 264-267
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Randhawa PS, Watson N, Lechner M, Ritchie L, Choudhury N, Andrews PJ. The outcome of septorhinoplasty surgery on olfactory function. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 41 (01) 15-20
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Gillman GS, Bakeman AE, Soose RJ. et al. Will nasal airway surgery improve my sense of smell? A prospective observational study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13 (08) 1511-1517
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Zhao K, Scherer PW, Hajiloo SA, Dalton P. Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction. Chem Senses 2004; 29 (05) 365-379
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Pendolino AL, Randhawa P, Unadkat S, Andrews PJ. Septoplasty for nasal obstruction. Lancet 2020; 395 (10223): 493
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sousa FA, Santos M, Correia JT, Pinto AN, Meireles L, Ferreira M. Septorhinoplasty and the late impact on olfactory function: a review and meta-analysis. Facial Plast Surg 2023; 39 (01) 69-76
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 O'Byrne L, Webster KE, MacKeith S, Philpott C, Hopkins C, Burton MJ. Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9 (09) CD013876
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Oleszkiewicz A, Schriever VA, Croy I, Hähner A, Hummel T. Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276 (03) 719-728
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Gudziol V, Lötsch J, Hähner A, Zahnert T, Hummel T. Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1858-1863
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ottaviano G, Pendolino AL, Nardello E. et al. Peak nasal inspiratory flow measurement and visual analogue scale in a large adult population. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (04) 541-548
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ottaviano G, Scadding GK, Scarpa B, Accordi D, Staffieri A, Lund VJ. Unilateral peak nasal inspiratory flow, normal values in adult population. Rhinology 2012; 50 (04) 386-392
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Ottaviano G, Fokkens WJ. Measurements of nasal airflow and patency: a critical review with emphasis on the use of peak nasal inspiratory flow in daily practice. Allergy 2016; 71 (02) 162-174
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 DeConde AS, Mace JC, Bodner T. et al. SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4 (12) 972-979
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (02) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Ottaviano G, Scadding GK, Coles S, Lund VJ. Peak nasal inspiratory flow; normal range in adult population. Rhinology 2006; 44 (01) 32-35
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Straszek SP, Schlünssen V, Sigsgaard T, Pedersen OF. Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in decongested school children and adults: the most sensitive measurement for change in nasal patency. Rhinology 2007; 45 (01) 36-39
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C, Lamping DL. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. J Public Health Med 1999; 21 (03) 255-270
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009; 34 (05) 447-454
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Shastri K, Gao Y, Davis SJ. et al. Normative values of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2023; 25 (01) 35-39
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Hornung DE, Leopold DA. Relationship between uninasal anatomy and uninasal olfactory ability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (01) 53-58
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Hedner M, Larsson M, Arnold N, Zucco GM, Hummel T. Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2010; 32 (10) 1062-1067
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Damm M, Eckel HE, Jungehülsing M, Hummel T. Olfactory changes at threshold and suprathreshold levels following septoplasty with partial inferior turbinectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 112 (01) 91-97
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Aydoğdu I, Atar Y, Aydoğdu Z. et al. Comparison of olfactory function and quality of life with different surgical techniques for nasal septum deviation. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 433-436
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Türk B, Akpinar M, Altundağ A, Kirik MO, Ünsal Ö, Coşkun BU. The effect of external approach septoplasty on olfactory function. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28 (07) 1675-1678
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Berkiten G, Kumral TL, Saltürk Z. et al. Effect of deviated nasal septum type on nasal mucociliary clearance, olfactory function, quality of life, and efficiency of nasal surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (05) 1151-1155
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Philpott CM, Rimal D, Tassone P, Prinsley PR, Premachandra DJ. A study of olfactory testing in patients with rhinological pathology in the ENT clinic. Rhinology 2008; 46 (01) 34-39
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Leopold DA. The relationship between nasal anatomy and human olfaction. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (11) 1232-1238
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Damm M, Vent J, Schmidt M. et al. Intranasal volume and olfactory function. Chem Senses 2002; 27 (09) 831-839
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Hornung DE, Smith DJ, Kurtz DB, White T, Leopold DA. Effect of nasal dilators on nasal structures, sniffing strategies, and olfactory ability. Rhinology 2001; 39 (02) 84-87
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Unadkat SN, Pendolino AL, Auer D. et al. The evidence base for the benefits of functional septorhinoplasty and its future post COVID-19. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (05) 625-631
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Ramprasad VH, Frank-Ito DO. A computational analysis of nasal vestibule morphologic variabilities on nasal function. J Biomech 2016; 49 (03) 450-457
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Sicard RM, Frank-Ito DO. Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2021; 82: 105282
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Whitcroft KL, Altundag A, Balungwe P. et al. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023. Rhinology 2023; 61 (33) 1-108
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Hwang SH, Kim SW, Basurrah MA, Kim DH. The efficacy of olfactory training as a treatment for olfactory disorders caused by coronavirus disease-2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2023; 37 (04) 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar