Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2025; 242(04): 398-404
DOI: 10.1055/a-2511-5899
Klinische Studie

Exit Strategy for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Real-World Setting: Wishful Thinking?

Exit-Strategie zur Behandlung der neovaskulären altersbedingten Makuladegeneration im realen Versorgungsumfeld: Wunschdenken?
Michael Eastline
1   Eye Clinic Wettingen, Switzerland
,
Sadiq Said
1   Eye Clinic Wettingen, Switzerland
2   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
,
Martina Monika Bosch
1   Eye Clinic Wettingen, Switzerland
2   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
,
Pascal Knecht-Bosch
1   Eye Clinic Wettingen, Switzerland
2   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction To analyze our outcome for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with aflibercept in a treat-and-extend regimen pursuing an exit strategy (with best possible adherence to the “Bern” exit criteria) over 6 years in a real-world setting. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the proportion of patients who were able to achieve and maintain treatment exit.

Methods This is a retrospective chart review study of treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with nAMD receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections performed at our department with at least 2 years of follow-up visits. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients able to achieve and maintain the treatment exit regarding intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Further outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), incidence of recurrence after treatment cessation, duration of therapy, and number and intervals of injections.

Results There were 31 eyes of 25 patients included in this retrospective study. The observation period was from September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2023. Of all included patient eyes, 22.6% (n = 7) reached exit criteria. Of all the “exit” patients, 28.6% (n = 2) suffered from disease relapse and therapy was restarted at a mean (± SD) of 41.5 ± 12.5 weeks (range: 29 to 54 weeks). Regarding the eyes that met treatment exit, 5 of 31 (16.1%) had no disease recurrence in the observed study period. The median BCVA (Snellen decimal; ± interquartile range: IQR) changed from 0.63 (0.27) at baseline to 0.63 (0.4) in the first year, 0.63 (0.3) in the second year, 0.63 (0.46) in the third year, 0.63 (0.3) in the fourth year, 0.63 (0.4) in the fifth year, and 0.4 (0.04) in the sixth year. The median number of injections (± IQR) per eye in the first year of treatment was 8 (2), in the second year 5 (2), in the third year 5 (2.5), in the fourth year 5 (1), in the fifth year 3 (0.8), and in the sixth year 3 (0). Extension of the treatment interval after the loading phase in weeks was achieved up to a median (± IQR) of 5.8 (4) in the first year, 8.4 (6) in the second year, 8 (5.7) in the third year, 9.4 (5.6) in the fourth year, 7 (6.9) in the fifth year, and 8.4 (3.1) in the sixth year of observation.

Discussion Our study indicates a lower rate of patients reaching exit criteria with a treat-and-extend regimen compared to clinical study settings, and a similar recurrence rate of nAMD after treatment cessation. Nonadherence to a strict treat-and-extend protocol might influence the result.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Ziel dieser Studie ist es, unsere Ergebnisse in Bezug auf Patienten mit neovaskulärer altersbedingter Makuladegeneration (nAMD) zu analysieren, die mit Aflibercept in einem “Treat-and-Extend”-Schema behandelt wurden, um eine Exit-Strategie zu verfolgen (mit bestmöglicher Adhärenz an die “Bern”-Exit-Kriterien), dies über einen Zeitraum von sechs Jahren in einem realen Versorgungsumfeld. Das Hauptziel der Studie war es, den Anteil der Patienten zu untersuchen, die ein Behandlungsende erreichen und aufrechterhalten konnten.

Methodik Dies ist eine retrospektive Aktenanalyse von therapienaiven Patienten, bei welchen eine nAMD diagnostiziert und intravitreale Aflibercept-Injektionen in unserer Klinik verabreicht wurden, mit mindestens zwei Jahren Nachbeobachtung. Der primäre Endpunkt war der Prozentsatz an Patienten, die in der Lage waren, das Behandlungsende im Hinblick auf intravitreale Anti-VEGF-Injektionen zu erreichen und aufrechtzuerhalten. Weitere Studien-Endpunkte waren best-korrigierte Sehschärfe (BCVA), Auftreten eines Rezidivs nach Behandlungsabbruch, Therapiedauer sowie Anzahl und Intervalle der Injektionen.

Resultate 31 Augen von 25 Patienten wurden in diese retrospektive Studie eingeschlossen. Der Beobachtungszeitraum erstreckte sich vom 1. September 2017 bis zum 31. August 2023. 22.6% der eingeschlossenen Augen (n = 7) erreichten die Exit-Kriterien. 28.6% (n = 2) aller “Exit”-Patienten erlitten ein Rezidiv und die Therapie wurde nach einem Mittelwert (± SD) von 41.5 ± 12.5 Wochen (Spanne: 29 bis 54 Wochen) wieder aufgenommen. Bezogen auf die Augen, die das Behandlungsende erreichten, hatten 5 von 31 (16.1%) während des beobachteten Studienzeitraums keinen Krankheitsrückfall. Die mediane BCVA (Snellen dezimal; ± Interquartilsabstand: IQR) veränderte sich von 0.63 (0.27) zu Beginn auf 0.63 (0.4) im 1. Jahr, 0.63 (0.3) im 2. Jahr, 0.63 (0.46) im 3. Jahr, 0.63 (0.3) im vierten Jahr, 0.63 (0.4) im fünften Jahr und 0.4 (0.04) im sechsten Jahr. Die mediane Anzahl der Injektionen (± IQR) pro Auge im 1. Behandlungsjahr betrug 8 (2), beim 2. Jahr 5 (2), im 3. Jahr 5 (2.5), im 4. Jahr 5 (1), im 5. Jahr 3 (0.8) und im 6. Jahr 3 (0). Die Verlängerung des Behandlungsintervalls nach der Ladephase in Wochen wurde bis zu einem Median (± IQR) von 5.8 (4) im 1. Jahr, 8.4 (6) im 2. Jahr, 8 (5,7) im 3. Jahr, 9.43 (5.6) im 4. Jahr, 7 (6.9) im 5. Jahr und 8.4 (3.1) im 6. Beobachtungsjahr erreicht.

Schlussfolgerung Unsere Studie weist verglichen mit anderen klinischen Studien auf eine geringere Rate an Patienten, die mit einem “Treat-and-Extend”-Schema die Exit-Kriterien erreichen, hin. Die Rezidivrate der nAMD nach Behandlungsende war jedoch ähnlich. Eine mangelnde Adhärenz zum strikten “Treat-and-Extend”-Protokoll könnte das Ergebnis beeinflusst haben.



Publication History

Received: 10 October 2024

Accepted: 07 January 2025

Article published online:
05 February 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Wong WL, Su X, Li X. et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2: e106-e116 PMID: 25104651
  • 2 Vyawahare H, Shinde P. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cureus 2022; 14: e29583
  • 3 Pugazhendhi A, Hubbell M, Jairam P. et al. Neovascular Macular Degeneration: A Review of Etiology, Risk Factors, and Recent Advances in Research and Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 1170
  • 4 Solomon SD, Lindsley K, Vedula SS. et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (03) CD005139
  • 5 Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS. et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1419-1431
  • 6 CATT Research Group. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS. et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1897-1908
  • 7 Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2537-2548
  • 8 Brown MM, Brown GC, Lieske HB. et al. Societal Costs Associated with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States. Retina 2016; 36: 285-298
  • 9 Agarwal A, Aggarwal K, Gupta V. Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Review on Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2016; 23: 27-37
  • 10 Chaikitmongkol V, Sagong M, Lai TYY. et al. Treat-and-Extend Regimens for the Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Consensus and Recommendations From the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2021; 10: 507-518
  • 11 Li E, Donati S, Lindsley KB. et al. Treatment regimens for administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; (05) CD012208
  • 12 Kim LN, Mehta H, Barthelmes D. et al. Metaanalysis of Real-World Outcomes of Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Retina 2016; 36: 1418-1431
  • 13 Giannakaki-Zimmermann H, Ebneter A, Munk MR. et al. Outcomes when Switching from a pro re nata Regimen to a Treat and Extend Regimen Using Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2016; 236: 201-206
  • 14 Augsburger M, Sarra GM, Imesch P. Treat and extend versus pro re nata regimens of ranibizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 1889-1895
  • 15 Jaggi D, Nagamany T, Ebneter A. et al. Aflibercept for age-related macular degeneration: 4-year outcomes of a ‘treat-and-extend’ regimen with exit-strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; 106: 246-250
  • 16 Arendt P, Yu S, Munk MR. et al. Exit Strategy in a Treat-and-Extend Regimen for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Retina 2019; 39: 27-33
  • 17 Menke MN, Zinkernagel MS, Ebneter A. et al. Functional and anatomical outcome of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab following an exit strategy regimen. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1197-1200
  • 18 Spaide RF, Jaffe GJ, Sarraf D. et al. Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 616-636
  • 19 Ohji M, Takahashi K, Okada AA. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Treat-and-Extend Regimens in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 52- and 96-Week Findings from ALTAIR: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Adv Ther 2020; 37: 1173-1187
  • 20 Jaki Mekjavić P, Gregorčič B, Oberč C. et al. Treat-and-extend therapy using intravitreal aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 2-year real-world practice data from Slovenia. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18: 333
  • 21 Ruys J, Mangelschots E, Jacob J. et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment Strategies in Routine Clinical Practice of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Belgium: A Retrospective Observational Study. Ophthalmol Ther 2020; 9: 993-1002
  • 22 Kaiser PK, Singer M, Tolentino M. et al. Long-term Safety and Visual Outcome of Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: VIEW 1 Extension Study. Ophthalmol Retina 2017; 1: 304-313
  • 23 Weber M, Velasque L, Coscas F. et al. Effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated in routine clinical practices across France: 12-month outcomes of the RAINBOW study. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2019; 4: e000109
  • 24 Traine PG, Pfister IB, Zandi S. et al. Long-term Outcome of Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using a “Treat-and-Extend” Regimen. Ophthalmol Retina 2019; 3: 393-399
  • 25 Falkenstein IA, Cochran DE, Azen SP. et al. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 319-323