RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2490-6896
Effekte von Genesungsbegleitung in der Psychiatrischen Versorgung: Ein Systematischer Review of Reviews
Effects of Peer Support Work in Psychiatry: A Systematic Literature Review of ReviewsAuthors

Zusammenfassung
Ziel Der vorliegende systematische Literaturreview fasst Überblicksarbeiten zu Effekten von Genesungsbegleitung in formalen klinischen psychiatrischen Settings zusammen, um so ein umfassendes Bild über den aktuellen Stand der Evidenz zu erhalten.
Methode Suche in fünf elektronischen Datenbanken nach relevanten Überblicksarbeiten zu Effekten von Genesungsbegleitung im psychiatrischen Setting. Die Datenbanksuche wurde durch eine Handsuche ergänzt.
Ergebnisse 16 Reviews wurden gefunden. Diese betrachten vorrangig klinische und psychosoziale Outcomes. Keine konsistenten Effekte werden im Zusammenhang mit klinischen Outcomes berichtet. Eine geringe positive Tendenz zeichnet sich für die psychosozialen Outcomes ab.
Schlussfolgerung Die Autor*innen der Reviews beklagten durchgehend die geringe Qualität der Ausgangsstudien. Daher können die vorliegenden Ergebnisse eher als vorläufige Tendenz interpretiert werden. Weitere Studien sind nötig, um die Wirkung von Genesungsbegleitung differenzierter betrachten zu können.
Abstract
Objective The current systematic review summarizes reviews on effects of formalized peer support work in clinical psychiatric settings in order to obtain an up-to-date picture of the current state of evidence.
Methods Search in five electronic databases for relevant literature reviews regarding effects of peer support work in psychiatric settings. Database searches were complemented by a hand search.
Results 16 reviews were found. They evaluate effects of peer support on clinical or psychosocial outcomes. No consistent effects are found for clinical outcomes. Small positive tendencies occur for psychosocial outcomes.
Conclusions The authors of the reviews consistently mentioned the low quality of the primary studies. Therefore, the present results can rather be interpreted as a preliminary tendency. Further studies are necessary for evaluation of peer support in a more differentiated way.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 25. März 2024
Angenommen: 07. November 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. Dezember 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Souliotis K. Public and patient involvement in health policy: A continuously growing field. Health Expect 2016; 19: 1171-1172
- 2 Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML. et al. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 1042-1047
- 3 Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C. et al. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199: 445-452
- 4 Alexander A. Modul 1 Recovery verstehen. In: G Zuaboni, C Abderhalden, M Schulz, A Winter, Hrsg. Verlag Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste; 2012
- 5 Ramon S, Healy B, Renouf N. Recovery from Mental Illness as an Emergent Concept and Practice in Australia and the UK. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2007; 53: 108-122
- 6 National Institute for Mental Health in England. NIMHE Guiding Statement on Recovery. 2005
- 7 DGPPN. S3-Leitlinie Psychosoziale Therapien bei schweren psychischen Erkrankungen. 2. Aufl. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2019.
- 8 Candelaria Mahlke, R Nixdorf, Julie Repper, A Charles, Mike Slade, G Ryan, C Hall, D. Baillie, R Hiltensperger, A Müller-Stierlin, J Nakku, R Mpango, D Shamba, M Ramesh PG-E, G S S Chaves. UPSIDES Peer Support Worker Training Manual and Workbook [Field Version]. UPSIDES Study; 2020
- 9 Mahlke C, Schulz G, Sielaff G. et al. Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Peerbegleitung in der psychiatrischen Versorgung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 2019; 62: 214-221
- 10 van Gestel-Timmermans H, Brouwers EPM, van Assen MALM. et al. Effects of a Peer-Run Course on Recovery From Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychiat Prax 2012; 63: 54-60
- 11 Mahlke CI, Priebe S, Heumann K. et al. Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness-A randomised controlled trial. Eur Psychiatry 2017; 42: 103-110
- 12 Druss BG, Zhao L, von Esenwein SA. et al. The Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) Program: A peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Res 2010; 118: 264-270
- 13 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71
- 14 Lunny C, Pieper D, Thabet P. et al. Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21: 140
- 15 Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP. et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 69: 225-234
- 16 Repper J, Carter T. Using personal experience to support other with similar difficulties. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. The University of Nottingham. London, UK: Together for Mental Wellbeing; 2010. 24.
- 17 Tyler N, Wright N, Waring J. Interventions to improve discharge from acute adult mental health inpatient care to the community: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 883
- 18 Gaiser MG, Buche JL, Wayment CC. et al. A Systematic Review of the Roles and Contributions of Peer Providers in the Behavioral Health Workforce. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61: e203-e210
- 19 Cano Prieto I, Simó Algado S, Prat Vigué G. Peer Interventions in Severe Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review and its Relation to Occupational Therapy. Occup Ther Ment Health 2023; 39: 99-136
- 20 Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson E, Harrison B. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 39
- 21 Shalaby RAH, Agyapong VIO. Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7: e15572
- 22 White S, Foster R, Marks J. et al. The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20: 1-21
- 23 Davidson L, Chinman M, Kloos B. et al. Peer Support among Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Review of the Evidence. Clin Psychol 1999; 6: 165-187
- 24 Fortuna KL, Naslund JA, LaCroix JM. et al. Digital Peer Support Mental Health Interventions for People With a Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness: Systematic Review. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7: e16460
- 25 Fuhr DC, Salisbury TT, De Silva MJ. et al. Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and depression on clinical and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014; 49: 1691-1702
- 26 Miyamoto Y, Sono T. Lessons from Peer Support Among Individuals with Mental Health Difficulties: A Review of the Literature. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2012; 8: 22-29
- 27 Mowbray O, Campbell R, Lee M. et al. A Systematic Review of Psychosocial-Based Outcomes in Peer-Support Services. J Evid Based Soc Work 2021; 18: 155-180
- 28 Høgh Egmose C, Heinsvig Poulsen C, Hjorthøj C. et al. The Effectiveness of Peer Support in Personal and Clinical Recovery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74: 847-858
- 29 Eddie D, Hoffman L, Vilsaint C. et al. Lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: A systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching. Front Psychol 2019; 10
- 30 Cabassa LJ, Camacho D, Vélez-Grau CM. et al. Peer-based health interventions for people with serious mental illness: A systematic literature review. J Psychiatr Res 2017; 84: 80-89
- 31 Walker G, Bryant W. Peer support in adult mental health services: a metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2013; 36: 28-34
- 32 Burke E, Pyle M, Machin K. et al. The effects of peer support on empowerment, self-efficacy, and internalized stigma: A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. Stigma Health 2019; 4: 337-356
- 33 Julie Repper. Peer Support Workers: Theory and Practice; 2013. Im Internet http://www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/pdfs/ImROC_peer_support_workers_theory_practice.pdf
- 34 Cooper RE, Saunders KRK, Greenburgh A. et al. The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review. BMC Med 2024; 22: 72
- 35 Schwarz J, Weinmann S. Aufsuchende, integrative und peergestützte Behandlungsansätze bei Therapieresistenz. In: Bauer, M, Berghöfer A, Brakemeier EL, Adli, M, Hrsg. Therapieresistenz bei Depressionen und bipolaren Störungen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2022.
- 36 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie e.V., Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Arzneimittelkommission der Deutschen Apotheker. et al. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Unipolare Depression – Langfassung. 2022;