The Association between the Social Vulnerability Index and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

Abstract

Objective Identifying underlying social risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission is important for designing interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine whether a patient's exposure to community-level stressors as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI) is associated with NICU admission.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study (2014–2018) of patients delivering a liveborn ≥ 22 weeks' gestation at a quaternary care center. Patient addresses were used to assign each individual a composite SVI and theme score. The primary exposure was a composite SVI score categorized into tertiles. The primary outcome was NICU admission. Secondary outcomes included NICU length of stay and neonatal morbidity composite. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between composite SVI and outcomes (low SVI as referent). We secondarily compared mean composite and theme SVI scores; individual components of each theme were also compared.

Results From 2014 to 2018, 13,757 patients were included; 2,837 (21%) had a neonate with NICU admission. Patients with higher SVI were more likely to self-identify as Black race and have medical comorbidities. Living in areas with moderate or high SVI was not associated with NICU admission (moderate SVI adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.34; high SVI aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95–1.33). Moderate SVI was associated with increased neonatal morbidity (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.001–1.38). In an analysis of SVI as a continuous variable, mean SVI scores were significantly higher in individuals who had an infant admitted to the NICU. Those requiring NICU admission lived in areas with lower per capita income and a higher number of mobile homes (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Patients living in areas with moderate or high SVI were not shown to have higher odds of having a neonate admitted to the NICU. Neonatal morbidity was higher in those living in areas with moderate SVI. Increased access to social services may improve neonatal outcomes.

Key Points

• Mean SVI scores are higher in those with a neonate admitted to the NICU.

• There was no observed association between moderate and high SVI scores and NICU admission.

• Moderate SVI is associated with an increased odds of overall neonatal morbidity.

• Greater exposure to low income may be associated with NICU admission.

Keywords

health disparities - perinatal - social determinants of health - social vulnerability - obstetric - maternal care

Publication History

Received: 05 March 2024

Accepted: 20 September 2024

Article published online:
30 October 2024

• References

• 1 Givrad S, Dowtin LL, Scala M, Hall SL. Recognizing and mitigating infant distress in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Neonatal Nurs 2021; 21 (01) 14-20
• 2 Speechley KN, Avison WR. Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit as a predictor of long-term health: a 12-year follow-up. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1995; 16 (06) 397-405
• 3 Aagaard H, Uhrenfeldt L, Spliid M, Fegran L. Parents' experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports 2015; 13 (10) 123-132
• 4 Infant Mortality. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. September 13, 2023. Accessed June 6, 2023 at: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm
• 5 Padula AM, Shariff-Marco S, Yang J. et al. Multilevel social factors and NICU quality of care in California. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (03) 404-412
• 6 Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (02) e65-e90
• 7 Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG committee opinion no. 729: importance of social determinants of health and cultural awareness in the delivery of reproductive health care. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (01) e43-e48
• 8 Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, Cubbin C, Braveman PA. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39 (03) 263-272
• 9 Greenberg MB, Gandhi M, Davidson C, Carter EB. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: [e-mail], Publications Committee. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine consult series #62: best practices in equitable care delivery-addressing systemic racism and other social determinants of health as causes of obstetrical disparities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227 (02) B44-B59
• 10 Givens M, Teal EN, Patel V, Manuck TA. Preterm birth among pregnant women living in areas with high social vulnerability. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (05) 100414
• 11 CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January 23, 2023 at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html
• 12 Yee CW, Cunningham SD, Ickovics JR. Application of the social vulnerability index for identifying teen pregnancy intervention need in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2019; 23 (11) 1516-1524
• 13 Aris IM, Perng W, Dabelea D. et al; Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes. Neighborhood opportunity and vulnerability and incident asthma among children. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177 (10) 1055-1064
• 14 Donkin A, Goldblatt P, Allen J, Nathanson V, Marmot M. Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Glob Health 2017; 3 (Suppl. 01) e000603
• 15 Lu MY, Blanchard CT, Ausbeck EB. et al. Evaluation of a risk-stratified, heparin-based, obstetric thromboprophylaxis protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (04) 530-538
• 16 Knupp RJ, Nassel A, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Battarbee AN, Subramaniam A. The association between the degree of social vulnerability of home residence and adverse perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226: S117-S118
• 17 GIS Tutorial for ArcGIS Pro 3.1 - exercise data - overview. Accessed October 2, 2023 at: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=21777534c47e4bce878fa499e3bda141
• 18 UC B. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS), and other standardized geographic codes. Census.gov. Accessed October 2, 2023 at: https://www.census.gov/library/reference/code-lists/ansi.html
• 19 Neo DT, Desrosiers TA, Martin CL. et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic position during early pregnancy and risk of gastroschisis. Epidemiology 2023; 34 (04) 576-588
• 20 CDC/ATSDR. Frequently asked questions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. October 26, 2022. Accessed November 22, 2023 at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/faq_svi.html
• 21 Wherry LR. State Medicaid expansions for parents led to increased coverage and prenatal care utilization among pregnant mothers. Health Serv Res 2018; 53 (05) 3569-3591
• 22 Bauchner H, Maddox KJ. Medicaid expansion and birth outcomes. JAMA 2019; 321 (16) 1609
• 23 Searing A, Cohen Ross D. Medicaid expansion fills gaps in maternal health coverage leading to healthier mother and babies; 2019. Accessed September 30, 2024 at: https://ccf.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Maternal-Health_FINAL-1.pdf
• 24 Webster JL, Paul D, Purtle J, Locke R, Goldstein ND. State-level social and economic policies and their association with perinatal and infant outcomes. Milbank Q 2022; 100 (01) 218-260
• 25 Troller-Renfree SV, Costanzo MA, Duncan GJ. et al. The impact of a poverty reduction intervention on infant brain activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119 (05) e2115649119
• 26 Implementation and action toolkit. Protocol for responding to and assessing patients' assets, risks, and experiences. Accessed October 2, 2023 at: https://prapare.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Full-Toolkit_June-2022_Final.pdf