Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2342-0919
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Should Be Recommended for Antepartum Admissions and Cesarean Delivery if Age and Body Mass Index Are Greater Than 35
Funding None.
Abstract
Objective Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Current expanded treatment recommendations result in the inclusion of a large percentage of the obstetric population, which has limited their adoption. The purpose of this study was to identify a population at high risk for VTE, with minimal impact on the number of patients that would qualify for expanded treatment.
Study Design We performed a retrospective analysis of a large obstetric population. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revsion (ICD-10) codes for VTE were used to identify patients presenting for obstetric or postpartum (PP) care from January 2016 to March 2018. The review focused on high-risk factors (history of VTE or high-risk thrombophilia), antepartum hospital admissions that were >72 hours in the previous 30 days, use of sequential compression devices, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), age, and mode of delivery. Pharmacologic treatment efficacy was set at 90, 75, or 50%.
Results During the 27-month review period, there were 120,235 deliveries and 93 had a VTE event in the index pregnancy or within 4 weeks PP (7.7/10,000 births). A history of VTE or high-risk thrombophilia was seen in 25.8% of cases. Antepartum admission was noted in 40.9%, and the combination of cesarean delivery (CD) with age and BMI ≥35 (Age + BMI + CD) was noted in 17.3% of PP cases. Targeting these latter two groups for VTE prophylaxis with a 75% efficacy suggests that 34% of the VTE events would likely have been prevented while increasing the total population treated by approximately 2%.
Conclusion Expanding pharmacologic prophylactical coverage to include an antepartum admission of >72 hours and those with Age + BMI + CD would result in about a one-third reduction in total VTE events with about 2% requiring treatment. These data support some of the suggested recommendations for expanded pharmacological deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.
Key Points
-
CD, and BMI and age >35 are high-risk factors for VTE.
-
Antepartum admission >72 hours is a high-risk factor for VTE.
-
Targeting antepartum admissions, CD, and BMI and age >35 would reduce VTE events by about 33%.
Publication History
Received: 18 March 2024
Accepted: 06 June 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
10 June 2024
Article published online:
10 July 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium. 2015 . Accessed January 8, 2024 at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg37a.pdf
- 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (01) e1-e17
- 3 Varrias D, Spanos M, Kokkinidis DG, Zoumpourlis P, Kalaitzopoulos DR. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: challenges and solutions. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2023; 19: 469-484
- 4 Friedman AM. Obstetric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, risk factors and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33 (05) 384-390
- 5 California Department of Public Health. Pregnancy-Related Mortality. 2023 . Accessed January 8, 2024 at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DMCAH/surveillance/Pages/Pregnancy-Related-Mortality.aspx
- 6 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Lu YS, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Underuse of postcesarean thromboembolism prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (06) 1197-1204
- 7 Ghaji N, Boulet SL, Tepper N, Hooper WC. Trends in venous thromboembolism among pregnancy-related hospitalizations, United States, 1994-2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (05) 433.e1-433.e8
- 8 Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, Seed K, Bruce FC, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006-2010. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (01) 5-12
- 9 California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Improving Health Care Response to Maternal Venous Thromboembolism. 2018 . Accessed January 8, 2024 at: cmqcc.org/resources-toolkits/toolkits/improving-health-care-response-maternal-venous-thromboembolism
- 10 Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM. et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2 suppl): e227S-e277S
- 11 Palmerola KL, D'Alton ME, Brock CO, Friedman AM. A comparison of recommendations for pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis after caesarean delivery from three major guidelines. BJOG 2016; 123 (13) 2157-2162
- 12 Sibai BM, Rouse DJ. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in obstetrics: broader use demands better data. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (04) 681-684
- 13 Kotaska A. Postpartum heparin thromboprophylaxis: more harm than good. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (04) 527-529
- 14 Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 3 (03) CD001689
- 15 Lu MY, Blanchard CT, Ausbeck EB. et al. Evaluation of a risk-stratified, heparin-based, obstetric thromboprophylaxis protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138 (04) 530-538
- 16 D'Alton ME, Friedman AM, Smiley RM. et al. National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus bundle on venous thromboembolism. Anesth Analg 2016; 123 (04) 942-949
- 17 Alhazzani W, Lim W, Jaeschke RZ, Murad MH, Cade J, Cook DJ. Heparin thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (09) 2088-2098
- 18 Eikelboom JW, Karthikeyan G, Fagel N, Hirsh J. American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons and American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty differ: what are the implications for clinicians and patients?. Chest 2009; 135 (02) 513-520
- 19 Lindqvist PG, Bremme K, Hellgren M. Working Group on Hemostatic Disorders (Hem-ARG), Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Efficacy of obstetric thromboprophylaxis and long-term risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90 (06) 648-653
- 20 Ho KM, Tan JA. Stratified meta-analysis of intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs to prevent venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Circulation 2013; 128 (09) 1003-1020
- 21 Monti D, Wang CY, Yee LM, Feinglass J. Antepartum hospital use and delivery outcomes in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3 (06) 100461
- 22 Brady MA, Carroll AW, Cheang KI, Straight C, Chelmow D. Sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (01) 19-25
- 23 Merriam AA, Huang Y, Ananth CV, Wright JD, D'Alton ME, Friedman AM. Postpartum thromboembolism prophylaxis during delivery hospitalizations. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (09) 873-881
- 24 Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, Chauhan SP, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Thromboembolism incidence and prophylaxis during vaginal delivery hospitalizations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (02) 221.e1-221.e12
- 25 Craigie S, Tsui JF, Agarwal A, Sandset PM, Guyatt GH, Tikkinen KA. Adherence to mechanical thromboprophylaxis after surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2015; 136 (04) 723-726
- 26 Greenall R, Davis RE. Intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review on factors affecting adherence. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (09) e037036