Effect of Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS) on Eyelid Anatomic Features

Abstract

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) improves gender dysphoria. The brows and eyes are crucial in perceived gender, yet brow and eyelid surgeries are relatively underutilized. This study aimed to determine rates of brow and eyelid surgeries as part of FFS and characterize pre- and postoperative periocular features. We conducted a retrospective review to identify all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent FFS at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Thirty-four patients comprising 38 surgical cases were included. Twelve (35%) eyelid surgeries and 27 (79%) brow lifts were performed. Baseline eyelid measurements did not differ between brow lift and nonbrow lift cases. Those undergoing brow lift and eyelid surgery were older in age (p = 0.022), had a higher rate of negative canthal tilt (p = 0.050), and smaller baseline margin-reflex distance 1 (p = 0.014) than patients who had brow lift alone. Brow lift increased tarsal platform show (p ≤ 0.001) and lash-to-brow distance (p ≤ 0.001), and upper blepharoplasty increased tarsal platform show (p = 0.01). Rates of brow lift are high at our institution, and patients are appropriately selected for eyelid surgery in FFS. Brow lift and upper blepharoplasty can feminize anatomical features when using standards described for cisgender cohorts. The impact of periocular features on gender perception in transgender patients warrants further study.

Keywords

facial feminization surgery - gender-affirming surgery - brow lift - blepharoplasty - eyelid

Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 April 2024

Article published online:
28 May 2024

• References

• 1 Chaya BF, Berman ZP, Boczar D. et al. Current trends in facial feminization surgery: an assessment of safety and style. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (07) 2366-2369
• 2 Morrison SD, Capitán-Cañadas F, Sánchez-García A. et al. Prospective quality-of-life outcomes after facial feminization surgery: an international multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1499-1509
• 3 Fisher M, Lu SM, Chen K, Zhang B, Di Maggio M, Bradley JP. Facial feminization surgery changes perception of patient gender. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (07) 703-709
• 4 Perrillat A, Coiante E, SidAhmed M, Graillon N, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Conservative approach to facial upper third feminisation: a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2023; 51 (02) 98-106
• 5 Brown E, Perrett DI. What gives a face its gender?. Perception 1993; 22 (07) 829-840
• 6 Siringo NV, Berman ZP, Boczar D. et al. Techniques and trends of facial feminization surgery: a systematic review and representative case report. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (06) 704-711
• 7 Cronin BJ, Fadich S, Lee JC. Assessing preferences of facial appearance in transgender and gender nonbinary patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (04) 621-632
• 8 Sedgh J. The aesthetics of the upper face and brow: male and female differences. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (02) 114-118
• 9 Warren RJ. Upper blepharoplasty and brow rejuvenation in men. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (02) 197-212
• 10 Wang TT, Wessels L, Hussain G, Merten S. Discriminative thresholds in facial asymmetry: a review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (04) 375-385
• 11 David AP, House AE, Targ S, Park AM, Seth R, Knott PD. Objective outcomes of trichophytic brow lift and hairline advancement in facial feminization surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022;
• 12 Pansritum K. Forehead and hairline surgery for gender affirmation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (03) e3486
• 13 Prantl L, Heidekrueger PI, Broer PN, Knoll S, Thiha A, Gründl M. Female eye attractiveness - where beauty meets science. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (01) 73-79
• 14 Dang BN, Hu AC, Bertrand AA. et al. Evaluation and treatment of facial feminization surgery: part I. Forehead, orbits, eyebrows, eyes, and nose. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (05) 503-510
• 15 Kurian K, Hao Y, Boczar D. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of facial anthropometric variations among cisgender females of different ethnicities: implications for feminizing facial gender affirming surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34 (03) 949-954
• 16 Blake CR, Lai WW, Edward DP. Racial and ethnic differences in ocular anatomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2003; 43 (04) 9-25
• 17 Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon B. Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (05) 1236-1245