Download PDF
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2278-9119
Original Article

The Effect of an Oxytocin Decision Support Checklist on Oxytocin Use and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nazineen Kandahari
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
2   Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California
,
Lue-Yen Tucker
2   Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
,
Tina Raine-Bennett   *
2   Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
,
Janelle Palacios
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California
,
Allison N. Schneider
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, INOVA Medical Group-Cares, Falls Church, Virginia
,
Vanitha J. Mohta
5   Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Walnut Creek, California
› Author Affiliations Funding Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Health Grant 0206-20003-2017. The funding body did not include a patient or public involvement panel, and the funder played no role in conducting the research or writing the manuscript.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To assess the association between use of an oxytocin decision support checklist with oxytocin usage and clinical outcomes.

Study Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with singleton gestations at 370/7 weeks or greater who received oxytocin during labor from October 2012 to February 2017 at an integrated community health care system during three exposure periods: (1) pre-checklist; (2) after paper checklist implementation; and (3) after checklist integration into the electronic medical record (EMR). The checklist was a clinical decision support tool to standardize the dosing and management of oxytocin. Thus, our primary outcomes included oxytocin infusion rates and cumulative dose. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. We controlled for maternal risk factors with multivariable regression analysis and stratified by mode of delivery.

Results A total of 34,269 deliveries were included. Unadjusted analyses showed that compared with pre-checklist, deliveries during the paper and EMR-integrated periods had a lower cumulative dose (4,670 ± 6,174 vs. 4,318 ± 5,719 and 4,286 ± 5,579 mU, p < 0.001 for both), lower maximal infusion rate (9.9 ± 6.8 vs. 8.7 ± 5.8 and 8.4 ± 5.6 mU/min, p < 0.001 for both), and longer duration of oxytocin use (576 ± 442 vs. 609 ± 476 and 627 ± 488 minutes, p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). The unadjusted rates of cesarean, 5-minute Apgar <7, mechanical ventilation, and neonatal hospital length of stay were similar between periods. The adjusted mean difference in time from admission to delivery was longer during the EMR-integrated period compared with pre-checklist (3.0 [95% confidence interval: 2.7–3.3] hours, p < 0.001).

Conclusion Oxytocin checklist use was associated with decreased oxytocin use patterns at the expense of longer labor times. Findings were more pronounced with EMR integration.

Key Points

  • An oxytocin decision support checklist is associated with reduced amounts of oxytocin used.

  • However, checklists were associated with longer duration of oxytocin use and of labor.

  • Results were more pronounced in the EMR-integrated checklist compared with paper checklist.

Keywords

oxytocin - decision support - checklist - maternal outcomes - neonatal outcomes

Note

This study was presented at the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine 38th Annual Meeting 2018, Dallas, TX.


Authors' Contribution

All authors listed contributed to conception, planning, carrying out, analyzing, and writing up of the work.


* Current affiliation: 49 Stevenson Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA 94105


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 18 March 2023

Accepted: 26 February 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 February 2024

Article published online:
02 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA. Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (06) 1279-1283
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Simpson KR, Knox GE. Oxytocin as a high-alert medication: implications for perinatal patient safety. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2009; 34 (01) 8-15 , quiz 16–17
    Google Scholar
  • 3 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (2 Pt 1): 386-397
    Google Scholar
  • 4 AHRQ Safety Program for Perinatal Care. Accessed August 22, 2020 at: http://www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/perinatal-care/index.html
  • 5 Bernstein PS, Combs CA, Shields LE, Clark SL, Eppes CS. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), SMFM Patient Safety and Quality Committee. The development and implementation of checklists in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (02) B2-B6
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gawande A. The checklist: if something so simple can transform intensive care, what else can it do?. New Yorker 2007; 86-101
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W. Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20 (01) 22-30
    Google Scholar
  • 8 ACOG Committee opinion no 579: definition of term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1139-1140
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA. Racism and health: evidence and needed research. Annu Rev Public Health 2019; 40 (01) 105-125
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Clinical Decision Support | HealthIT.gov. Accessed August 22, 2020 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/clinical-decision-support
  • 11 Garg T, Lee JY, Evans KH, Chen J, Shieh L. Development and evaluation of an electronic health record-based best-practice discharge checklist for hospital patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2015; 41 (03) 126-131
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G. et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (05) 480.e1-480.e5
    Google Scholar
  • 13 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335 (7624): 806-808
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Jr JLG, Goodman AH. Racism, Not Race: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions. Columbia University Press; 2021: 320 Pages.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Boyd RW, Lindo EG, Weeks LD, McLemore MR. On Racism: A New Standard for Publishing on Racial Health Inequities. Health Affair Forefront 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 (suppl 2, suppl 2): 19-31
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Singh SS, Mehra N, Hopkins L. No. 286-surgical safety checklist in obstetrics and gynaecology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018; 40 (03) e237-e242
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Miller LA. Oxytocin, excessive uterine activity, and patient safety: time for a collaborative approach. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2009; 23 (01) 52-58
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (06) CD007123
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Wei S, Wo BL, Qi HP. et al. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (08) CD006794
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Alexander MV, Wang MJ, Srivastava A. et al. Association between duration of intrapartum oxytocin exposure and obstetric hemorrhage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309 (02) 491-501
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bischoff K, Nothacker M, Lehane C, Lang B, Meerpohl J, Schmucker C. Lack of controlled studies investigating the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in cesarean delivery after prior use of oxytocin: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17 (01) 399
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Clark SL, Nageotte MP, Garite TJ. et al. Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (02) 89-97
    Google Scholar