Significance of Physical Exercise in Pregnancy: Comparison of Short and Long Exercise Programs

Abstract

Background Several musculoskeletal changes occur in pregnancy, particularly in the abdominal region. The aim of this study was to search and compare the effects of long (LEP) and short exercise programs (SEP) in terms of the satisfaction of the needs of pregnant women.

Methods This study consisted of 2 groups: LEP (n=16) and SEP (n=16). Muscle thickness measurements determined by ultrasound, the 6 minute walk test, Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire were the study variables. Evaluations were done at the 16th (baseline), 24th, and 32nd gestational weeks. The LEP consisted of 20 and the SEP consisted of 9 exercises, which were applied for 16 weeks until the 32nd gestational week.

Results Emotional role limitation and pain scores of quality of life, 6 minute walk test, and occupational physical activity were found to be better in the LEP group at the 24th gestational week (p=0.043, p=0.049, p=0.049, p=0.026). At the 32nd gestational week, the 6 minute walk test and occupational physical activity were found to be higher in the LEP group (p=0.006, p=0.017). Additionally, rectus abdominis and bilateral diaphragm muscle thicknesses, “moderate intensity and sports physical activity” and “vitality and emotional well-being” were increased over time with the LEP (p+<+0.05 for all). On the other hand, unilateral diaphragm muscle thickness, sports physical activity level, and vitality were improved with the SEP (p+<+0.05 for all).

Conclusions The SEP and LEP both have beneficial effects in pregnant women. However, the LEP increases physical activity level, functional capacity, and quality of life more than the SEP during the later stages of pregnancy.

Key words

fitness and sports - perinatal - pregnancy - antenatal care

Schlüsselwörter

Fitness und Sport - Geburtshilfe - perinatal

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. September 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 16. Dezember 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Januar 2024

• References

• 1 Bermas BL. Maternal adaptations to pregnancy: musculoskeletal changes and pain. Uptodate Database Syst Rev. 2020
• 2 Gamble P. An integrated approach to training core stability. Strength Cond J 2007; 29: 58
• 3 Gilleard WL, Brown JMM. Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 750-762
• 4 Weis CA, Triano JJ, Barrett J. et al. Ultrasound assessment of abdominal muscle thickness in postpartum vs nulliparous women. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38: 352-357
• 5 Weis CA, Nash J, Triano JJ. et al. Ultrasound assessment of abdominal muscle thickness in women with and without low back pain during pregnancy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017; 40: 230-235
• 6 Rostami M, Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia MA. et al. Comparison of the thickness of lateral abdominal muscles between pregnant women with and without low back pain. PM R 2015; 7: 474-478
• 7 Franchi MV, Longo S, Mallinson J. et al. Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross-sectional area in the assessment of strength training-induced hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018; 28: 846-853
• 8 Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM. et al. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23: 539-549
• 9 Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 1996; 21: 2640-2650
• 10 Mogren IM, Pohjanen AI. Low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors. Spine 2005; 30: 983-991
• 11 Aragão FFd. Pregnancy-related lumbosacral pain. BrJP 2019; 2: 176-181
• 12 Sehmbi H, D'Souza R, Bhatia A. Low back pain in pregnancy: investigations, management, and role of neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia: a systematic review. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2017; 82: 417-436
• 13 Fukano M, Tsukahara Y, Takei S. et al. Recovery of abdominal muscle thickness and contractile function in women after childbirth. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 2130
• 14 Aktan B, Kayıkçıoğlu F, Akbayrak T. The comparison of the effects of clinical Pilates exercises with and without childbirth training on pregnancy and birth results. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75: e14516
• 15 Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 804. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137: 376
• 16 Kokic IS, Ivanisevic M, Uremovic M. et al. Effect of therapeutic exercises on pregnancy-related low back pain and pelvic girdle pain: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2017; 49: 251-257
• 17 Hasanabadi H, Bahri N, Tara F. et al. The effects of exercise on back pain during pregnancy: a review article. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014; 17: 16-28
• 18 van Benten E, Pool J, Mens J. et al. Recommendations for physical therapists on the treatment of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 464-A415
• 19 Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C. et al. Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: s192-s300
• 20 Gutke A, Betten C, Degerskär K. et al. Treatments for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94: 1156-1167
• 21 Liddle SD, Pennick V. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: : CD001139
• 22 Rudin LR, Dunn L, Lyons K. et al. Professional exercise recommendations for healthy women who are pregnant: a systematic review. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 2021; 2: 400-412
• 23 White EE, Richards M, Kloeckner A. et al. Effects of a practical resistance band training intervention on muscle soreness during pregnancy: A pilot study. OAJ Preg Child Care 2019;
• 24 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J. et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 333-341
• 25 Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 804. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135: e178-e188
• 26 Persinger R, Foster C, Gibson M. et al. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1632-1636
• 27 Shamsi M, Sarrafzadeh J, Jamshidi A. et al. The effect of core stability and general exercise on abdominal muscle thickness in non-specific chronic low back pain using ultrasound imaging. Physiother Theory Pract 2016; 32: 277-283
• 28 Bunce S, Moore A, Hough A. M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness?. Clinical Biomechanics 2002; 17: 315-317
• 29 Noormohammadpour P, Kordi R, Dehghani S. et al. The effect of abdominal resistance training and energy restricted diet on lateral abdominal muscles thickness of overweight and obese women. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012; 16: 344-350
• 30 Singh SJ, Puhan MA, Andrianopoulos V. et al. An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1447-1478
• 31 Amola M, Pawara S, Kalra S. Effect of inspiratory muscle training and diaphragmatic breathing exercises on dyspnea, pulmonary functions, fatigue and functional capacity in pregnancy during third trimester. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2019; 13: YC01-YC04
• 32 Chasan-Taber L, Schmidt MD, Roberts DE. et al. Development and validation of a pregnancy physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36
• 33 Tosun OC, Solmaz U, Ekin A. et al. The Turkish version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 3215-3221
• 34 Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF. et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41: 1073-1093
• 35 Vianin M. Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Chiropr Med 2008; 7: 161-163
• 36 Yakut E, Düger T, Öksüz Ç. et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 581-585
• 37 Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med 2016; 4: 2050312116671725
• 38 Roberts JE. The “push” for evidence: management of the second stage. J Midwifery Womens Health 2002; 47: 2-15
• 39 Barasinski C, Vendittelli F. Effect of the type of maternal pushing during the second stage of labour on obstetric and neonatal outcome: a multicentre randomised trial—the EOLE study protocol. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012290
• 40 Dülger E, Bilgin S, Bulut E. et al. The effect of stabilization exercises on diaphragm muscle thickness and movement in women with low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018; 31: 323-329
• 41 Ferté J-B, Boyer FC, Taiar R. et al. Impact of resistance training on the 6-minute walk test in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2022; 65: 101582
• 42 Amezcua-Prieto C, Olmedo-Requena R, Jímenez-Mejías E. et al. Changes in leisure time physical activity during pregnancy compared to the prior year. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17: 632-638
• 43 Clarke P, Rousham E, Gross H. et al. Activity patterns and time allocation during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of British women. Ann Hum Biol 2005; 32: 247-258
• 44 Maia LB, Amarante LG, Vitorino DF. et al. Effectiveness of conservative therapy on pain, disability and quality of life for low back pain in pregnancy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Braz J Phys Ther 2021; 25: 676-687
• 45 Arizabaleta AVM, Buitrago LO, de Plata ACA. et al. Aerobic exercise during pregnancy improves health-related quality of life: a randomised trial. J Physiother 2010; 56: 253-258
• 46 Wegner M, Helmich I, Machado S. et al. Effects of exercise on anxiety and depression disorders: review of meta-analyses and neurobiological mechanisms. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders) 2014; 13: 1002-1014
• 47 Lin X, Zhang X, Guo J. et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e002014
• 48 Kramer M. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Birth 2003; 30: 278-279
• 49 Magann EF, Evans SF, Weitz B. et al. Antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal significance of exercise on healthy low-risk pregnant working women. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 466-472
• 50 Horns PN, Ratcliffe LP, Leggett JC. et al. Pregnancy outcomes among active and sedentary primiparous women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996; 25: 49-54
• 51 Polley BA, Wing R, Sims C. Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 1494-1502
• 52 Bungum TJ, Peaslee DL, Jackson AW. et al. Exercise during pregnancy and type of delivery in nulliparae. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2000; 29: 258-264
• 53 Sternfeld B, Quesenberry CP, Eskenazi B. et al. Exercise during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 634-640
• 54 Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009; 11: 163-176
• 55 Price BB, Amini SB, Kappeler K. Exercise in pregnancy: effect on fitness and obstetric outcomes – a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 2263-2269