Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(02): 156-162
DOI: 10.1055/a-2102-0040
Original Article

Aesthetic Implications of Bilateral Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps on Thigh and Buttock Proportions

Dominic Henn
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Alexis Lakatta
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Sumeet S. Teotia
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Nicholas T. Haddock
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as an excellent secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the increased acceptance, potential secondary benefits concerning aesthetic proportions of proximal thigh and buttock at the donor site have never been systematically investigated.

Methods A retrospective review of 151 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with horizontally designed PAP flaps (292 flaps) from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, complications, and numbers of revision surgeries were collected. In bilateral reconstructions, pre- and postoperative standardized patient photographs were analyzed to identify postoperative changes in proximal thigh and buttock contour. The patients' own perception of postoperative aesthetic changes was determined by an electronic survey.

Results The patients had a mean age of 51 and a mean body mass index of 26.3 kg/m2. The most common complications were minor and major wound complications affecting 35.1% of patients, followed by cellulitis (12.6%), seroma (7.9%), and hematoma (4.0%). A total of 38 patients (25.2%) underwent revision of the donor site. After reconstruction, patients were found to have aesthetically improved proximal thigh and buttock proportions, indicated by a wider thigh gap (thigh gap-hip ratio: 0.05 ± 0.04 vs. 0.13 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001) and reduction in lateral thigh-to-buttock ratio (0.85 ± 0.05 vs. 0.76 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001). Among the 85 patients who responded to the survey (56.3% response rate), 70.6% felt that PAP surgery had aesthetically either improved their thigh contour (54.12%) or not changed it (16.47%), whereas only 29.4% reported that the surgery negatively impacted their thigh contour.

Conclusion PAP flap breast reconstruction leads to improved aesthetic proportions of the proximal thigh and buttock. This approach is ideal for patients with ptotic tissue of the inferior buttocks and medial thigh, a poorly defined infragluteal fold, and inadequate anterior-posterior buttock projection.

Keywords

profunda artery perforator flap - thigh aesthetics - breast reconstruction


Publication History

Received: 11 December 2022

Accepted: 23 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 May 2023

Article published online:
05 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (01) 32-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 16e-23e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Haddock NT, Gassman A, Cho MJ, Teotia SS. 101 consecutive profunda artery perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: lessons learned with our early experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (02) 229-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haddock N, Nagarkar P, Teotia SS. Versatility of the profunda artery perforator flap: creative uses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 606e-612e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Haddock NT, Cho MJ, Gassman A, Teotia SS. Stacked profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in failed or unavailable deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 488e-494e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics. The Aesthetic Society. Accessed June 10, 2023 at: https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (Suppl. 03) 1-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wong WW, Motakef S, Lin Y, Gupta SC. Redefining the ideal buttocks: a population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (06) 1739-1747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vartanian E, Gould DJ, Hammoudeh ZS, Azadgoli B, Stevens WG, Macias LH. The ideal thigh: a crowdsourcing-based assessment of ideal thigh aesthetic and implications for gluteal fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (08) 861-869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haddock NT, Suszynski TM, Teotia SS. An individualized patient-centric approach and evolution towards total autologous free flap breast reconstruction in an academic setting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Haddock NT, Greaney P, Otterburn D, Levine S, Allen RJ. Predicting perforator location on preoperative imaging for the profunda artery perforator flap. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (07) 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wong C, Nagarkar P, Teotia S, Haddock NT. The profunda artery perforator flap: investigating the perforasome using three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 915-919
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim HB, Han SJ, Kim EK, Eom JS, Han HH. Comparative study of DIEP and PAP flaps in breast reconstruction: reconstructive outcomes and fat necrosis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2040-1368.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nam YS, Kim HB, Kim SH, Eom JS, Han HH. Cadaveric study for safe elevation of a profunda artery perforator flap: anatomy of the perforators and obturator nerves. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (09) 727-733
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jo T, Jeon DN, Han HH. The PAP flap breast reconstruction: a practical option for slim patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 27-33
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cho MJ, Garza R, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Utility of ERAS pathway in nonabdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction: efficacy in PAP flap reconstruction?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (05) 371-377
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cho MJ, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Classification and management of donor-site wound complications in the profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (02) 110-115
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lockwood T. Medial thigh surgery. Aesthet Surg J 1996; 16 (02) 94-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Candiani P, Campiglio GL, Signorini M. Fascio-fascial suspension technique in medial thigh lifts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19 (02) 137-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kirwan L. Anchor thighplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2004; 24 (01) 61-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gassman A, Mehta A, Bucholdz E. et al. Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates. Hernia 2015; 19 (02) 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sisti A, Cuomo R, Zerini I. et al. Complications associated with medial thigh lift: a comprehensive literature review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2015; 8 (04) 191-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cuenca-Guerra R, Quezada J. What makes buttocks beautiful? A review and classification of the determinants of gluteal beauty and the surgical techniques to achieve them. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28 (05) 340-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Our obsession with the “thigh gap”. Aesthetic Society. 2013 . Accessed June 10, 2023 at: https://www.surgery.org/consumers/plastic-surgery-news-briefs/obsession-thigh-gap-1050634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ralph-Nearman C, Arevian AC, Puhl M. et al. A novel mobile tool (Somatomap) to assess body image perception pilot tested with fashion models and nonmodels: cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6 (10) e14115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Centeno RF. Gluteal aesthetic unit classification: a tool to improve outcomes in body contouring. Aesthet Surg J 2006; 26 (02) 200-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mendieta CG, Sood A. Classification system for gluteal evaluation: revisited. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (02) 159-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar