Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes following Ovulation Induction and Unassisted Pregnancies in the Same Mother

Abstract

Objective We aimed to assess whether ovulation induction treatments affect obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Study Design This was a historic cohort study of deliveries in a single university-affiliated medical center between November 2008 and January 2020. We included women who had one pregnancy following ovulation induction and one unassisted pregnancy. The obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared between pregnancies following ovulation induction and unassisted pregnancies, so that each woman served as her own control. The primary outcome measure was birth weight.

Results A total of 193 deliveries following ovulation induction and 193 deliveries after unassisted conception by the same women were compared. Ovulation induction pregnancies were characterized by a significantly younger maternal age and a higher rate of nulliparity (62.7 vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001). In pregnancies achieved by ovulation induction, we found a higher rate of preterm birth (8.3 vs. 4.1%, p = 0.02) and instrumental deliveries (8.8 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.005), while cesarean delivery rates were higher following unassisted pregnancies. Birth weight was significantly lower in ovulation induction pregnancies (3,167 ± 436 vs. 3,251 ± 460 g, p = 0.009), although the rate of small for gestational age neonates was similar between the groups. On multivariate analysis, birth weight remained significantly associated with ovulation induction after adjustment for confounders, while preterm birth did not.

Conclusion Pregnancies following ovulation induction treatments are associated with lower birth weight. This may be related to an altered placentation process following uterine exposure to supraphysiological hormonal levels.

Key Points

• Ovulation induction entails lower birthweight.

• This may relate to supraphysiological hormonal levels.

• Monitoring fetal growth is advised in such cases.

Keywords

ovulation induction - unassisted conception - birth weight - preterm birth

Publication History

Received: 19 July 2022

Accepted: 22 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 May 2023

Article published online:
26 June 2023

• References

• 1 Weiss NS, Kostova E, Nahuis M, Mol BWJ, van der Veen F, van Wely M. Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 1 (01) CD010290
• 2 Yılmaz NK, Sargın A, Erkılınç S, Özer İ, Engin-Üstün Y. Does ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination affect perinatal outcomes in singletons?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (01) 14-17
• 3 Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Crispi F, Manau D. et al. Differential effect of mode of conception and infertility treatment on fetal growth and prematurity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (23) 3879-3884
• 4 Stanford JB, Simonsen SE, Baksh L. Fertility treatments and adverse perinatal outcomes in a population-based sampling of births in Florida, Maryland, and Utah: a cross-sectional study. BJOG 2016; 123 (05) 718-729
• 5 Silberstein T, Levy A, Harlev A, Saphier O, Sheiner E. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27 (13) 1316-1319
• 6 Cooper AR, O'Neill KE, Allsworth JE. et al. Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (05) 1100-1106
• 7 D'Angelo DV, Whitehead N, Helms K, Barfield W, Ahluwalia IB. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (02) 314-320.e2
• 8 Gaudoin M, Dobbie R, Finlayson A, Chalmers J, Cameron IT, Fleming R. Ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination in infertile couples is associated with low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (03) 611-616
• 9 Källén B, Olausson PO, Nygren KG. Neonatal outcome in pregnancies from ovarian stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 (03) 414-419
• 10 Nuojua-Huttunen S, Gissler M, Martikainen H, Tuomivaara L. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies after intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (08) 2110-2115
• 11 Besharati M, von Versen-Höynck F, Kapphahn K, Baker VL. Examination of fetal growth trajectories following infertility treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37 (06) 1399-1407
• 12 Sun L-M, Walker MC, Cao H-L, Yang Q, Duan T, Kingdom JCP. Assisted reproductive technology and placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (04) 818-824
• 13 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e1-e25
• 14 American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013; 36 (Suppl. 01) S67-S74
• 15 Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, Gorfein I, Gordon ES. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2005; 7 (05) 311-314
• 16 Klemetti R, Sevón T, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Health of children born after ovulation induction. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (04) 1157-1168
• 17 Shinohara S, Hirata S, Suzuki K. Association between infertility treatment and intrauterine growth: a multilevel analysis in a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10 (04) e033675
• 18 Malchau SS, Loft A, Henningsen A-KA, Nyboe Andersen A, Pinborg A. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (04) 1110-1116.e2
• 19 Messerlian C, Maclagan L, Basso O. Infertility and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (01) 125-137
• 20 Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB. et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19 (02) 87-104
• 21 de Waal E, Vrooman LA, Fischer E. et al. The cumulative effect of assisted reproduction procedures on placental development and epigenetic perturbations in a mouse model. Hum Mol Genet 2015; 24 (24) 6975-6985
• 22 Senapati S, Wang F, Ord T, Coutifaris C, Feng R, Mainigi M. Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35 (10) 1799-1808
• 23 Bourdon M, Ouazana M, Maignien C. et al. Impact of supraphysiological estradiol serum levels on birth weight in singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Reprod Sci 2020; 27 (09) 1770-1777
• 24 Kohl Schwartz AS, Mitter VR, Amylidi-Mohr S. et al. The greater incidence of small-for-gestational-age newborns after gonadotropin-stimulated in vitro fertilization with a supraphysiological estradiol level on ovulation trigger day. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98 (12) 1575-1584
• 25 Pereira N, Elias RT, Christos PJ. et al. Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2017; 32 (07) 1410-1417
• 26 Pereira N, Reichman DE, Goldschlag DE, Lekovich JP, Rosenwaks Z. Impact of elevated peak serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the birth weight of term singletons from fresh IVF-ET cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32 (04) 527-532
• 27 Imudia AN, Awonuga AO, Doyle JO. et al. Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (06) 1374-1379
• 28 Liu S, Kuang Y, Wu Y. et al. High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum beta-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35 (02) 189-196
• 29 Cai J, Liu L, Xu Y. et al. Supraphysiological estradiol level in ovarian stimulation cycles affects the birthweight of neonates conceived through subsequent frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective study. BJOG 2019; 126 (06) 711-718