J Knee Surg 2024; 37(05): 335-340
DOI: 10.1055/a-2094-5443
Original Article

Practice Changes Induced by a Traveling Fellowship

1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California
,
Akaila C. Cabell
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California
,
Stephen T. Duncan
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
,
3   Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport U.O.C Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
,
Peter K. Sculco
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
,
C. Lowry Barnes
5   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California
› Author Affiliations
Zoom Image

Abstract

The John N. Insall Knee Society Traveling Fellowship selects four international arthroplasty or sports fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons to spend 1 month traveling to various Knee Society members' joint replacement and knee surgery centers in North America. The fellowship aims to foster research and education and shares ideas among fellows and Knee Society members. The role of such traveling fellowships on surgeon preferences has yet to be investigated. A 59-question survey encompassing patient selection, preoperative planning, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative protocols was completed by the four 2018 Insall Traveling Fellows before and immediately after the completion of traveling fellowship to assess anticipated practice changes (e.g., initial excitement) related to their participation in a traveling fellowship. The same survey was completed 4 years after the completion of the traveling fellowship to assess the implementation of the anticipated practice changes. Survey questions were divided into two groups based on levels of evidence in the literature. Immediately after fellowship, there was a median of 6.5 (range: 3–12) anticipated changes in consensus topics and a median of 14.5 (range: 5–17) anticipated changes in controversial topics. There was no statistical difference in the excitement to change consensus or controversial topics (p = 0.921). Four years after completing a traveling fellowship, a median of 2.5 (range: 0–3) consensus topics and 4 (range: 2–6) controversial topics were implemented. There was no statistical difference in the implementation of consensus or controversial topics (p = 0.709). There was a statistically significant decline in the implementation of changes in consensus and controversial preferences compared with the initial level of excitement (p = 0.038 and 0.031, respectively). After the John N. Insall Knee Society Traveling Fellowship, there is excitement for practice change in consensus and controversial topics related to total knee arthroplasty. However, few practice changes that had initial excitement were implemented after 4-year follow-up. Ultimately, the effects of time, practice inertia, and institutional friction overcome most of the anticipated changes induced by a traveling fellowship.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 April 2022

Accepted: 12 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 May 2023

Article published online:
03 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA