Pneumologie 2022; 76(05): 330-339
DOI: 10.1055/a-1740-3377
Originalarbeit

Risikoänderung bei Patienten mit Pulmonaler Arterieller Hypertonie unter medikamentöser Therapie – Ergebnisse aus vier deutschen Zentren

Risk Stratification in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension under Treatment – Results of Four German Centers
Beate Stubbe
1   University Medicine Greifswald, Internal Medicine B, Pneumology, Greifswald
,
Michael Halank
2   Internal Medicine, Pneumology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
,
Hans-Jürgen Seyfarth
3   University Hospital Leipzig, Internal Medicine, Pneumology, Leipzig, Germany
,
Anne Obst
1   University Medicine Greifswald, Internal Medicine B, Pneumology, Greifswald
,
Susanna Desole
1   University Medicine Greifswald, Internal Medicine B, Pneumology, Greifswald
,
Christian F. Opitz
4   DRK Kliniken Berlin, Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Berlin, Germany
,
Ralf Ewert
1   University Medicine Greifswald, Internal Medicine B, Pneumology, Greifswald
› Author Affiliations
This study was financially supported by Janssen-Cilag.

Zusammenfassung

Die Risikobewertung für das abgeschätzte Überleben von PAH-Patienten ist eine wesentliche Grundlage für abgeleitete Therapieentscheidungen. Es existieren verschiedene Modelle für die Einschätzung des Risikos, welche jedoch weitgehend vergleichbar sind.

Es wurden 131 PAH-Patienten aus den Jahren 2016–2018 hinsichtlich des Risikos nach dem ESC-/ERS-Schema ausgewertet. Etwa 2 Drittel der Patienten (mittleres Alter 64 ± 14 Jahre) wiesen ≥ 3 Komorbiditäten bzw. kardiovaskuläre Risikofaktoren auf.

Zu Beginn der Beobachtung waren 13,8 % der Patienten als „low risk“, 76,3 % als „intermediate risk“ und 9,9 % als „high risk“ einzustufen. Zum Zeitpunkt der zweiten Kontrolle (im Mittel nach 12 ± 3 Monaten, Spanne 9–16 Monate) zeigten von den 111/131 (85 %) lebenden Patienten 20,7 % eine „low risk“-, 64,9 % eine „intermediate risk“- und 14,4 % eine „high risk“-Konstellation. Somit konnte lediglich ein geringer Anteil der Patienten durch die Therapie in eine günstigere Risiko-Kategorie überführt werden.

Die von uns beobachteten Patienten mit einem „low risk“-Profil hatten ein Überleben von 100 % über 24 Monate. Die Patienten mit einem „intermediate risk“-Profil zeigten nach 12 Monaten ein Überleben von 96 % und nach 24 Monaten ein Überleben von 82 %. Dagegen lag das Überleben der Patienten mit einer „high risk“-Konstellation nach 12 Monaten bei 89 % und nach 24 Monaten bei nur 51 %.

Trotz der aktuell verfügbaren therapeutischen Optionen konnte in unserer Analyse aus deutschen PH-Zentren nur ein kleiner Teil der PAH-Patienten während der Beobachtung in eine Niedrig-Risikogruppe mit guter Prognose überführt werden.

Abstract

Risk stratification plays an essential role in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). According to the current European guidelines the expected 1-year risk of mortality for PAH patients can be categorized as low, intermediate, or high, based on clinical, non-invasive and hemodynamic data.

Data from 131 patients with incident PAH (age 64 ± 14) and frequent comorbidities (in 66.4 %) treated between 2016 and 2018 at 4 German PH centers were analyzed. At baseline, most patients were classified as intermediate risk (76 %), 13.8 % as high risk and only 9.9 % as low risk.

During follow-up while on treatment after 12 ± 3 months (range 9–16 months) 64.9 % were still classified as intermediate risk (76 %), 14.4 % as high risk and 20.7 % as low risk.

Survival at 12 and 24 months was 96 % and 82 % in the intermediate risk group, while only 89 % and 51 % of the high risk patients were alive at these time points. In contrast, all patients in the low risk category were alive at 24 months.

Despite the availability of various treatment options for patients with PAH even in specialized centers only a minority of patients can be stabilized in the low risk group associated with a good outcome.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Galiè N, Channick RN, Frantz RP. et al. Risk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801889
  • 2 Hoeper MM, Apitz C, Grunig E. et al. Targeted therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Updated recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018. Int J Cardiol 2018; 272S: 37-45
  • 3 Kylhammar D, Kjellstrom B, Hjalmarsson C. et al. A comprehensive risk stratification at early follow-up determines prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 4175-4181
  • 4 Hjalmarsson C, Radegran G, Kylhammar D. et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on risk stratification in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1702310
  • 5 Boucly A, Weatherald J, Savale L. et al. Risk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700889
  • 6 Hoeper MM, Kramer T, Pan Z. et al. Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700740
  • 7 Hoeper MM, Pittrow D, Opitz C. et al. Risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1702606
  • 8 Benza RL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Miller DP. et al. The REVEAL Registry risk score calculator in patients newly diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2012; 141: 354-362
  • 9 Benza RL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Elliott CG. et al. Predicting Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The REVEAL Risk Score Calculator 2.0 and Comparison With ESC/ERS-Based Risk Assessment Strategies. Chest 2019; 156: 323-337
  • 10 Weatherald J, Boucly A, Sitbon O. Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2018; 24: 407-415
  • 11 Benza RL, Miller DP, Foreman AJ. et al. Prognostic implications of serial risk score assessments in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 356-361
  • 12 Olsson KM, Richter MJ, Kamp JC. et al. Intravenous treprostinil as an add-on therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38: 748-756
  • 13 Bourge RC, Waxman AB, Gomberg-Maitland M. et al. Treprostinil Administered to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using a Fully Implantable Programmable Intravascular Delivery System: Results of the DelIVery for PAH Trial. Chest 2016; 150: 27-34
  • 14 Sitbon O, Chin KM, Channick RN. et al. Risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Insights from the GRIPHON study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39: 300-309
  • 15 Badagliacca R, DʼAlto M, Ghio S. et al. Risk Reduction and Hemodynamics with Initial Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 484-492
  • 16 Humbert M, Farber HW, Ghofrani HA. et al. Risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1802004
  • 17 Mercurio V, Diab N, Peloquin G. et al. Risk assessment in scleroderma patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of the ESC/ERS risk prediction model. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1800497
  • 18 Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL. et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903-975
  • 19 Swinnen K, Quarck R, Godinas L. et al. Learning from registries in pulmonary arterial hypertension: pitfalls and recommendations. Eur Respir Rev 2019; 28: 190050
  • 20 Benza RL, Farber HW, Selej M. et al. Assessing risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension: what we know, what we donʼt. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701353
  • 21 DʼAlonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM. et al. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 343-349
  • 22 Thenappan T, Shah SJ, Rich S. et al. Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1079-1087
  • 23 Nickel N, Golpon H, Greer M. et al. The prognostic impact of follow-up assessments in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 589-596
  • 24 Weatherald J, Boucly A, Chemla D. et al. Prognostic Value of Follow-Up Hemodynamic Variables After Initial Management in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 2018; 137: 693-704
  • 25 Swiston JR, Johnson SR, Granton JT. Factors that prognosticate mortality in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review of the literature. Respir Med 2010; 104: 1588-1607
  • 26 Galiè N, Manes A, Negro L. et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 394-403
  • 27 Xanthouli P, Koegler M, Marra AM. et al. Risk stratification and prognostic factors in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and comorbidities a cross-sectional cohort study with survival follow-up. Respir Res 2020; 21: 127
  • 28 Badagliacca R, Papa S, Poscia R. et al. The added value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the follow-up of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38: 306-314
  • 29 Sommer N, Ghofrani HA, Pak O. et al. Current and future treatments of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 178: 6-30
  • 30 Burger CD, Pruett JA, Lickert CA. et al. Prostacyclin Use Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Health Care Claims Database. J Manag Care Spec Ph 2018; 24: 291
  • 31 Stubbe B, Seyfarth HJ, Kleymann J. et al. Monotherapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension at four German PH centres. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21: 130
  • 32 Hoeper MM, Pausch C, Grunig E. et al. Temporal trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from the COMPERA registry. Eur Respir J 2021; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02024-2021.
  • 33 Samson R, Jaiswal A, Ennezat PV. et al. Clinical Phenotypes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e002477
  • 34 Forfia PR, Vaidya A, Wiegers SE. Pulmonary heart disease: The heart-lung interaction and its impact on patient phenotypes. Pulm Circ 2013; 3: 5-19
  • 35 Leuchte HH, Halank M, Held M. et al. Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Using the Example of Collagenosis-associated PAH in the Context of Chronic Lung and Left Heart Disease. Pneumologie 2021; 75: 122-137
  • 36 Opitz CF, Hoeper MM, Gibbs JS. et al. Pre-Capillary, Combined, and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pathophysiological Continuum. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 368-378
  • 37 Hoeper MM, Pausch C, Grunig E. et al. Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension phenotypes determined by cluster analysis from the COMPERA registry. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39: 1435-1444
  • 38 Scott JV, Garnett CE, Kanwar MK. et al. Enrichment Benefits of Risk Algorithms for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 726-736
  • 39 Benza RL, Kanwar MK, Raina A. et al. Development and Validation of an Abridged Version of the REVEAL 2.0 Risk Score Calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for Use in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Chest 2021; 159: 337-346
  • 40 Kanwar MK, Gomberg-Maitland M, Hoeper M. et al. Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension using Bayesian analysis. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2000008
  • 41 Sonnweber T, Schneider EM, Nairz M. et al. Risk assessment in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a comparative analysis. Respir Res 2021; 22: 28
  • 42 Leuchte HH, Ten Freyhaus H, Gall H. et al. Risk stratification strategy and assessment of disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Updated Recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018. Int J Cardiol 2018; 272S: 20-29
  • 43 Yogeswaran A, Richter MJ, Sommer N. et al. Advanced risk stratification of intermediate risk group in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ 2020; 10: 2045894020961739
  • 44 Wronski SL, Mordin M, Kelley K. et al. The Role of Noninvasive Endpoints in Predicting Long-Term Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Lung 2020; 198: 65-86
  • 45 Yogeswaran A, Tello K, Faber M. et al. Risk assessment in severe pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39: 1118-1125
  • 46 Humbert M, Lau EMT. Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Do Not Forget the Patient Perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 675-677
  • 47 Favoccia C, Kempny A, Yorke J. et al. EmPHasis-10 score for the assessment of quality of life in various types of pulmonary hypertension and its relation to outcome. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019; 26: 1338-1340
  • 48 Lewis RA, Armstrong I, Bergbaum C. et al. EmPHasis-10 health-related quality of life score predicts outcomes in patients with idiopathic and connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from a UK multicentre study. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2000124
  • 49 Min J, Badesch D, Chakinala M. et al. Prediction of Health-related Quality of Life and Hospitalization in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 761-764