Effect of Air Tamponade among Patients with Epiretinal Membranes and Intraretinal Cystoid Changes Undergoing Vitrectomy with Membrane Peeling – A Prospective Randomized Trial

Abstract

Background The effect of air tamponade among patients undergoing vitrectomy with membrane peeling for removal of epiretinal membranes (ERM) is controversially discussed. The aim of the present study was to analyze differences in outcomes between air tamponade and balanced salt solution (BSS) in a study population with preoperative intraretinal cystoid changes.

Patients and Methods This randomized study included patients scheduled for pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling owing to ERM and intraretinal cystoid changes. Air tamponade or BSS at the end of surgery was applied according to preoperative randomization. Optical coherence tomography and best-corrected distance visual acuity (DCVA) measurements were performed before surgery, 5 days after surgery, and 3 months after surgery.

Results From 96 patients included, 85 eyes had full follow-up and could be included for analysis. Median improvement of DCVA was + 16 EDTRS letters (IQR: 8 to 22) among patients with BSS, while it was + 13 EDTRS letters (IQR: 8 to 17) among patients with air tamponade. There was a trend for better improvement of DCVA when BSS was left at the end of surgery, compared to air tamponade, but not reaching statistical significance.

Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences concerning resorption of preoperative intraretinal cystoid changes, improvement of visual acuity, and final DVCA between air tamponade and BSS.

Key words

air tamponade - epiretinal membranes - vitrectomy with membrane peeling - intraretinal cystoid changes

Publication History

Received: 22 June 2021

Accepted: 20 August 2021

Article published online:
08 November 2021

• References/Literatur

• 1 Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T. et al. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1033-1040 DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30190-0.
• 2 Bu SC, Kuijer R, Li XR. et al. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina 2014; 34: 2317-2335 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000349.
• 3 Kohno RI, Hata Y, Kawahara S. et al. Possible contribution of hyalocytes to idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation and its contraction. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1020-1026 DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.155069.
• 4 Zhao F, Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C. et al. Epiretinal cell proliferation in macular pucker and vitreomacular traction syndrome: analysis of flat-mounted internal limiting membrane specimens. Retina 2013; 33: 77-88 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182602087.
• 5 Sebag J. Anatomy and pathology of the vitreo-retinal interface. Eye (Lond) 1992; 6: 541-552 DOI: 10.1038/eye.1992.119.
• 6 Guidry C. The role of Müller cells in fibrocontractive retinal disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005; 24: 75-86 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.07.001.
• 7 Vinores SA, Campochiaro PA, McGehee R. et al. Ultrastructural and immunocytochemical changes in retinal pigment epithelium, retinal glia, and fibroblasts in vitreous culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 2529-2545
• 8 Sheales MP, Kingston ZS, Essex RW. Associations between preoperative OCT parameters and visual outcome 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254: 1909-1917 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3326-x.
• 9 Leisser C, Hirnschall N, Hackl C. et al. Risk factors for postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes after peeling of idiopathic epiretinal membranes among patients randomized for balanced salt solution and air-tamponade. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96: e439-e444 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13635.
• 10 Leisser C, Hirnschall N, Döller B. et al. Effect of Air Tamponade on Postoperative Visual Acuity and Intraretinal Cystoid Changes after Peeling of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes in Pseudophakic Patients. Ophthalmologica 2020; 243: 37-42 DOI: 10.1159/000498898.
• 11 Leisser C, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Effect of Phacoemulsification on Outcomes after Vitrectomy with Membrane Peeling regarding New Intraretinal Cystoid Changes and Transient Macular Edema. Ophthalmologica 2021; 244: 150-158 DOI: 10.1159/000512637.
• 12 Mitamura Y, Hirano K, Baba T. et al. Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 171-175 DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.146381.
• 13 Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH. et al. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 473-480.e3 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.020.
• 14 Oster SF, Mojana F, Brar M. et al. Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment layer on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography is a predictor of poor visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membranes. Retina 2010; 30: 713-718 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c596e3.
• 15 Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y. et al. Preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 2011; 31: 1366-1372 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318203c156.
• 16 Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M. et al. The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153: 698-704 704.e1 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.011.
• 17 Watanabe K, Tsunoda K, Mizuno Y. et al. Outer retinal morphology and visual function in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131: 172-177 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.686.
• 18 Cobos E, Arias L, Ruiz-Moreno J. et al. Preoperative study of the inner segment/outer segment junction of photoreceptors by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in patients with epiretinal membranes. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7: 1467-1470 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S44837.
• 19 Govetto A, Virgili G, Rodriguez FJ. et al. Functional and anatomical significance of the ectopic inner foveal layers in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membranes: Surgical results at 12 months. Retina 2019; 39: 347-357 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001940.
• 20 Leitritz MA, Ziemssen F, Voykov B. et al. Early postoperative changes of the foveal surface in epiretinal membranes: comparison of 23-gauge macular surgery with air vs. balanced salt solution. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 1213-1219 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2573-y.
• 21 Saghaei M, Saghaei S. Implementation of an open-source customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials. J Biomed Sci Eng 2011; 4: 734-739
• 22 Burggraaff MC, Trieu J, de Vries-Knoppert WA. et al. The clinical spectrum of microcystic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 952-961 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12912.
• 23 Massin P, Allouch C, Haouchine B. et al. Optical coherence tomography of idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 732-739 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00574-2.
• 24 Reichenbach A, Wurm A, Pannicke T. et al. Müller cells as players in retinal degeneration and edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 627-636 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0516-y.
• 25 Sigler EJ, Randolph JC, Charles S. Delayed onset inner nuclear layer cystic changes following internal limiting membrane removal for epimacular membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 1679-1685 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2253-8.
• 26 Frisina R, Pinackatt SJ, Sartore M. et al. Cystoid macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 47-56 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2655-x.
• 27 Chen SJ, Tsai FY, Liu HC. et al. Postoperative inner nuclear layer microcysts affecting long-term visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 2016; 36: 2377-2383 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001100.
• 28 Dolz-Marco R, Hoang QV, Gallego-Pinazo R. et al. Assessment of the significance of cystic changes after epiretinal membrane surgery with internal limiting membrane removal. Retina 2016; 36: 727-732 DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000780.
• 29 Hsieh MH, Chou YB, Huang YM. et al. Inner Nuclear Layer Microcyst Configuration, Distribution, and Visual Prognosis in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane After Vitrectomy and Membrane Peeling. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 11570 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48097-1.
• 30 Heussen FM, Ouyang Y, McDonnell EC. et al. Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 380-385 DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.201111.
• 31 Sander B, Al-Abiji HA, Kofod M. et al. Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 1915-1921 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3075-2.